Skip to main content

1710: The Introduction of Experimental Nervous System Physiology and Anatomy by François Pourfour du Petit

  • Chapter
Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth-Century Neuroscience

The beginnings of an experimental approach to brain function derived from the study of brain lesions can be traced to antiquity, but the emergence of a reasoned systematic methodology was surprisingly slow to mature in the early period of empiricism. The Oxford “virtuosi” associated with Willis (Lower, Wren, & others) in the late seventeenth century responded to the thrust of William Harvey’s brilliant experiments, devised to explain the nature of the action of the heart and circulation of blood, by injecting various substances into the vasculature of dogs and observing their effects. Yet there was surprisingly little effort to add new empirical gains concerning brain function before the remarkable contributions of François Pourfour du Petit (1664–1741) in the early eighteenth century. His earliest and most important work, Lettres d’un Medecin des Hôpitaux du Roy, a un Autre Medecin de Ses Amis, was published in 1710 and contains an account of brain lesions as well as some experiments describing vascular infusion of acids and alkalis derived from the reports of Willis (1664). The treatise by Petit (as he was generally known) survives in but few copies and details of its contents remain astonishingly obscure to collectors, libraries, and historical accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barzun, J. (2000). From dawn to decadence. New York: Harper Collins. 877pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, A. E. (1969). Pourfour du Petit’s experiments on the origin of the sympathetic nerve. Medical History, 13, 154–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, T. (1679). Sepulchretum; sive, Anatomia practica: ex cadaveribus morbo denatis, proponens historias et observationes omnium pene humani corporis effectuum (4 Vols.). Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E. (1981). The historical development of experimental brain and spinal cord physiology before Flourens (M. Neuberger, Trans., 1897). Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. 391pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E., & O’Malley, C. D. (1996). Human brain and spinal cord: a historical study illustrated by writings from antiquity to the twentieth century. San Francisco: Norman. 951pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, F. J. (1949). A history of comparative anatomy. London: Macmillan. 524pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloy, N. F. J. (1778). Dictionaire historique de la médecine ancienne et moderne... (4 Vols.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, G. T., & Hitzig, E. (1870). Über die elektrische Erregbarkeit des Grosshirns. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss. Med, 300–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier d’Agoty (1748). Anatomie de la tête, en tableaux imprimés, qui représentent au naturel le cerveau sous différentes coupes, la distribution des vaisseaux dans toutes les parties de la tête, les organes des sens, & une partie de la névrologie; d’aprés les piéces disséquées & préparées, par Duverney. Paris: Gautier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse, D. (1980). Greenwich Time and the discovery of the longitude. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 254pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L. (1963). Francois Pourfour du Petit, 1664–1741. Experimental Neurology, 7, ii–v.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, A. (1766). Recueil d’observations d’anatomie et de chirurgue; pour servir de base á la théorie des lesions de la tête, par contre-coupe. Paris: PG. Cavalier. 270pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairan, J. J., & Dortous de. (1747). Éloges des académiciens de l’Académie royale des Sciences: morts dans les anneés 1741, 1742, & 1743. Paris: Durand. 360pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. (1971). Historical aspects of cerebral anatomy. New York: Oxford University Press. 230pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, M. (1897). Die historische entwicklung der experimentellen Gehirn-und Rückenmarksphysiologie vor Flourens. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke. 361pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, M. (1981). The historical development of experimental brain and spinal cord physiology before Flourens/Max Neuburger; translated and edited with additional material, by Edwin Clarke. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pordage, S. (1681). In W. Feindel (Ed.), English translation of Willis’s cerebri anatome (1965). Montreal: McGill University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourfour du Petit, F. (1710). Lettres d’un medecin des hôpitaux du Roy, a un autre medecin de ses amis. Namur: C. G. Albert. 38pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourfour du Petit, F. (1727). Mémoire dans lequel il est démontré que les nerfs intercostaux fournissent des rameaux qui portent des esprits dans les yeux. Mém. Acad. r. Sci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. T. (1947). Some trends in neuroanatomy. Dubuque Iowa: W.C. Brown. 93pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ségura, P., Speeg-Schatz, C., Wagner, J. M., & Kern, O. (1998). Le syndrome de Claude Bernard-Horner et son contraire, le syndrome de Pourfour du Petit, en anesthésie-réanimation. Annales Françaises d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation, 17, 709–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (1995). Longitude: the true story of a lone genius who solved the greatest scientific problem of his time. New York: Walker. 184pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soury, J. (1899). Le Système Nerveux Central: structure et functions histoire critique des théories et des doctrines (2 Vols.). Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, B. M., & Terpak, F. (2001). Devices of Wonder; from the world in a box to images on a screen. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, J. H. (1906). One-position ophthalmometry. Transactions of Optical Society, 8, 74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, O. (1951). The role of surgery in the rise of modern medical thought. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 25, 248–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. M. (1910). Decussation of the pyramids: An historical inquiry. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 21, 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, T. (1664). Cerebri Anatome, cui accessit nervorum descriptio et usus. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieussens, R. (1685). Neurographia universalis. Leyden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder, E. (1968). Francois Pourfour du Petit (1664–1741) und seine experimentelle Forschung über das Nervensystem. (dissertation). Zürich: Juris-Verlag. 39pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kruger, L., Swanson, L.W. (2007). 1710: The Introduction of Experimental Nervous System Physiology and Anatomy by François Pourfour du Petit. In: Whitaker, H., Smith, C.U.M., Finger, S. (eds) Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth-Century Neuroscience. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics