Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Politics of Protest Political Science and the Study of Social Movements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Social movements represent a challenge not only to more conventional political action, but also to academic analysis. To be sure, scholarly inquiry often does not neatly follow disciplinary boundaries. Topics, ideas, methods, and even scholars borrow move across disciplinary boundaries. Such disciplinary spillover figures to be even more pronounced in an area of inquiry like social movements, where the definitional boundaries are not well delineated and the questions to be explored are extremely diverse. As a discipline, political science touches on many aspects of social movements and the politics of protest

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Cloth bound cover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Albritton, Robert B. 1979. “Social Amelioration through Mass Insurgency: Re-Examination of the Piven and Cloward Thesis.” American Political Science Review 73:1003–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel, G. Bingham Powell, Kaare Strom, and Russell Dalton, eds. 2004. Comparative Politics Today: A World View, 8th edition. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, Peter and Morton S. Baratz. 1963. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework.” The American Political Science Review 57:632–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, Mark ed. 1994. The Los Angeles Riots: Lessons for the Urban Future. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaszak, Lee Ann. 1996. Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunity, Culture, and the Struggle for Woman Suffrage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaszak, Lee Ann, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht, eds. 2003. Women’s Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandy, Joe and Jackie Smith, eds. 2004. Coalitions across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, Karen. 1996. “Lancashire Women against Pit Closures: Women’s Standing in a Men’s Movement.” Feminist Theory and Practice Summer:1034–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, Nancy. 1999. “Myths of Moderation.” Pp. 120–139 in Transitions to Democracy, edited by Lisa Anderson. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffrey. 1984. Lobbying for the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskin, Joseph, ed. 1969. Urban Racial Violence in the Twentieth Century. Beverly Hills, CA: Glencoe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, Vincent. 2004. Resisting Dictatorship: Repression and Protest in Southeast Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Rufus P., Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb. 1984. Protest Is Not Enough: The Struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for Equality in Urban Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, James W. 1978. Black Violence: Political Impact of the 1960s Riots. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, Stokely (Kwame Ture) and Charles V. Hamilton. 1992 [1967]. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirot, Daniel. 1999. “What Happened in Eastern Europe in 1989?” Pp. 19–50 in The Revolutions of 198 9, edited by Vladimir Tismaneanu. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Cathy J. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costain, Anne N. 1992. Inviting Women’s Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women’s Movement. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1963. Who Governs: Democracy and Power in the American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. 1988. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. and Manfred Kuechler, eds. 1990. Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, Donatella and Herbert Reiter, eds. 1998. Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, Donatella and Dieter Rucht. 1995. “Left-libertarian Movements in Context: A Comparison of Italy and West Germany, 1965– 1990.” Pp. 229–272 in The Politics of Social Protest, edited by J. Craig Jenkins and Bert Klandermans. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1953.The Political System. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray. 1971. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. New York: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” The American Political Science Review 67(1):11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Jo. 1975. The Politics of Women’s Liberation: A Case Study of an Emerging Social Movement and its Relation to the Policy Process. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Joseph F. 1992. Government Is Good: Citizenship, Participation, and Power. Columbia, MO: University ofMissouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1990 [1975]. The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Bedolla, Lisa. 2005. Fluid Borders: Latino Power, Identity, and Politics in Los Angeles, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, John. 1981. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Carbondale, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, Joyce. 1989. Feminism and Politics: A Comparative Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giugni, Marco. 2004. Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack, ed. 2003. Revolutions: Theoretical, Comparative, and Historical Studies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Jeff. 2003. “The East European Revolutions of 1989.” Pp. 255–261 in Revolutions: Theoretical, Comparative, and Historical Studies, 3rd edition, edited by Jack A. Goldstone. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics.” International Organization 32:881–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, Herbert H. 1988. Black Radicals and the Civil Rights Mainstream, 1954–1970. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imig, Douglas R. 1996. Poverty and Power: The Political Representation of Poor Americans. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imig, Douglas R. and David S. Meyer. 1993. “Political Opportunity and Peace and Justice Advocacy in the 1980s: A Tale of Two Sectors.” Social Science Quarterly 74:750–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imig, Douglas R. and Sidney Tarrow, eds. 2001. Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, Jane. 1982. “The Modern Women’s Movement in Italy, France, and Great Britain.” Comparative Social Research 5:341–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest inside the Church and Military.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. “Rights without Citizenship: Activist Politics and Prison Reform in the United States.” Pp. 236–258 in Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, edited by David S. Meyer, Valerie Jenness, and Helen Ingram. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, Ira. 1982. City Trenches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Claire Jean. 2000. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York. New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16:57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopf, Jeffrey W. 1998. Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on US Arms Control Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud. 1995. Democracy from Below: New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud and Paul Statham. 1999a. “Challenging the Liberal Nation-state? Postnationalism, Multiculturalism, and the Collective Claims Making of Migrants and Ethnic Minorities in Britain and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 105:652–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1999b. “Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches.”Mobilization 4:40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, William. 1959. The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duvydenak, and Marco G. Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political Man. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael 1968. “Protest as a Political Resource.” American Political Science Review 62:1144–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1970. Protest in City Politics: Rent Strikes, Housing and the Power of the Poor. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael and David J. Olson. 1977. Commission Politics: The Processing of Racial Crisis in America.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore J. 1968. Private Life and Public Order: The Context of Modern Public Policy. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1971. The Politics of Disorder. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 2005 [1974]. Power: A Radical View, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930 –1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1973. The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, Suzanne. 2002. “Bringing the State Back in to Civic Engagement: Policy Feedback Effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II Veterans.” American Political Science Review 96(2):351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. “Policy Feedback Effects for Collective Action: Lessons from Veterans’ Programs.” Pp. 211–235 in Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, edited by David S. Meyer, Valerie Jenness, and Helen Ingram. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S. 1990. A Winter of Discontent: The Nuclear Freeze and American Politics. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2000. “Social Movements: Creating Communities of Change.” Pp. 35–55 in Feminist Approaches to Social Movements, Community, and Power, Vol. I: Conscious Acts and the Politics of Social Change, edited by Mary Ann Tetreault and Robin L. Teske. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2004a. “Political Opportunity and Nested Institutions.” Social Movement Studies 2:17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2004b. “Protest and Political Opportunity.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. “Social Movements and Public Policy: Eggs, Chickens, and Theory.” Pp. 1–25 in Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, edited by David Meyer, Valerie Jenness, and Helen Ingram. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2007. The Politics of Protest: Social Movements in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David, Valerie Jenness, and Helen Ingram, eds. 2005. Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S. and Douglas R. Imig. 1993. “Political Opportunity and the Rise and Decline of Interest Group Sectors.” Social Science Journal 30:253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S. and Suzanne Staggenborg. 1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 101:1628–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S. and Sidney Tarrow, eds. 1998. The Social Movement Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Roberto. 1966 [1915]. Political Parties. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, Hans J. 1993. Politics Among Nations. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettl, J.P. 1968. “The State as a Conceptual Varialbe.” World Politics 20(4):559–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1967. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1989. The Rationality of Political Protest: A Comparative Analysis of Rational Choice Theory.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, Frank 1968. Middle-Class Radicalism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward. 1971. Regulating the Poor. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward. 1977. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail.New York: Vintage Books/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, Nelson 1967. Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert 2000. Bowling Alone: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rady, Martyn. 1992. Romania in Turmoil: A Contemporary History. London: IB Tauris & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, Ellen. 2005. “Policy Threats and Social Movement Coalitions: California’s Campaign to Restore Legal Immigrants’ Rights to Welfare.” Pp. 259–287 in Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, edited by David S. Meyer, Valerie Jenness, and Helen Ingram. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmerman, Craig A. 2002. From Identity to Politics: The Lesbian and Gay Movements in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H., ed. 1973. Ghetto Revolts. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucht, Dieter. 1990. “The Strategies and Action Repertoires of New Movements.” Pp. 156–175 in Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Manfred Kuechler. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucht, Dieter. 2000. “Distant Issue Movements in Germany: Empirical Description and Theoretical Reflections.” Pp. 76–105 in Globalizations and Social Movements: Culture, Power, and the Transnational Public Sphere,edited by John A. Guidry, Michael D. Kennedy, and Mayer N. Zald. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2003. “Interactions between Social Movements and States in a Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 242–274 in Women’s Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, edited by Lee Ann Banaszak, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucht, Dieter, Ruud Koopmans, and Friedhelm Neidhardt. 1999. Acts of Dissent: New Developments in the Study of Protest. Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustow, Dankwart.1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politic 2:337–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, Robert H. 1970. Interest Group Politics in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1984. “What Accent the Heavenly Choir? Political Equality and the American Pressure System.” Journal of Politics 46:1006–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Mildred. 2005. Party Movements in the United States and Canada: Strategies of Persistence. Lanham,MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O. 1994. “Urban Rioting in Los Angeles: A Comparison of 1965 with 1992.” Pp. 237–254 in The Los Angeles Riots: Lessons for the Urban Future, edited by Mark Baldassare. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jackie, Charles Chatfield and Ron Pagnucco, eds. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the State. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney G. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965– 1975. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teske, Robin L. and Mary Ann Tetreault, eds. 2000. Feminist Approaches to Social Movements, Community, and Power, Vol. 1: Conscious Acts and the Politics of Social Change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Daniel C. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1993. “Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834.” Social Science History 17:253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tismaneanu, Vladimir, ed. 1999. The Revolutions of 1989. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L. 1983. “The Origin and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America.” American Political Science Review 72:390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. 1995. Political Organizations, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    David S. Meyer

  2. Department of Political Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Lindsey Lupo

Authors
  1. David S. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lindsey Lupo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Social Sciences, Free University, DeBoelelaan 108/c, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands

    Bert Klandermans

  2. Social Sciences, Free University, DeBoelelaan 108/c, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands

    Conny Roggeband

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, D.S., Lupo, L. (2009). Assessing the Politics of Protest Political Science and the Study of Social Movements. In: Klandermans, B., Roggeband, C. (eds) Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70960-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation