School and Inclusive Practices

  • Adrian F. Ashman
Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning book series (CULS, volume 8)

Over the past 20 years, there has been an imperative in most Western countries to accommodate students with special learning needs in regular education settings. Inclusion has become the catchword that epitomizes the notion of equality and opportunity in social and scholarly domains. It would seem logical that the adoption of inclusion as a systemic policy would lead to significant changes in classroom teaching and learning practices but this does not appear to be the case. The implementation of new teaching-learning technologies to support inclusive education practices, including peer-mediation, has not kept pace with the acceptance of the rhetoric. In this chapter, I draw a parallel between the evidence supporting the benefits of inclusive education and the data that confirm the value of peer-mediation with students with diverse learning needs.


Intellectual Disability Cooperative Learning Inclusive Education Gifted Student Talented Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Antil, L. R., Jenkins, J. R., Wayne, S. K., & Vadsy P. F. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Education Research Journal, 35, 419–454.Google Scholar
  2. Ashman, A. F. (2003). Peer mediation and students with diverse learning needs. In R. M. Gillies & A. F. Ashman (Eds.), Cooperating learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (pp. 87–102). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, J. M. & Zigmond, N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from five cases. Journal of Special Education, 29, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, S., Gersten, R., Dimino, J. A., & Griffiths, R. (2004). The sustained use of research-based instructional practice: A case study of peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics. Remedial and Special Education: Special Issue on Sustainability, 25, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biklen, D. (Ed.). (1985). Achieving the complete school: Strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  6. Braggett, E. & Bailey, S. (2005). Gifted and talented children and their education. In A. Ashman and J. Elkins (Eds.), Educating children with diverse abilities (2nd edn.). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  7. Bricker, D. (1995). The challenge of inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., & Higbee, L. M. (1998). Participation in cooperative learning activities by children with specific language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1193–1206.Google Scholar
  9. Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., Montague, E. C., & Hanton, J. L. (2000). Children with language impairment in cooperative work groups: A pilot study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. Special Issue: Collaboration and inclusion: Multiple perspectives – one focus, 31, 252–264.Google Scholar
  10. Bryant, D. P. & Bryant, B. R. (1998). Using assistive technology adaptations to include students with learning disabilities in cooperative learning activities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calhoon, M. B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman, J. W. (1988). Special education in the least restrictive environment: Mainstreaming or maindumping? Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 14, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, M. R. & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). The successful blending of gifted education with middle school and cooperative learning: Two studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 362–384.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, B., & Semmel, M. I. (1999). Peer acceptance of included students with disabilities as a function of severity of disability and classroom composition. Journal of Special Education, 33, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: A competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 193–200.Google Scholar
  16. Darnon, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2002). Epistemic and relational conflicts in sharing identical vs complementary information during cooperative learning. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. d’Arripe-Longueville, F., Gernigon, C., Huet, M-L., Cadopi, M., & Winnykamen, F. (2002). Peer tutoring in a physical education setting: Influence of tutor skill level on novice learners’ motivation and performance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 105–123.Google Scholar
  18. Downs, A. & Smith, T. (2004). Emotional understanding, cooperation, and social behavior in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 625–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn, L. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.Google Scholar
  20. Elkins, J. 1994. The school context. In A. Ashman & J. Elkins (Eds.), Educating children with special needs (pp. 71–104). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Emmer, E. T. & Gerwels, M. C. (2002). Cooperative learning in elementary classrooms: Teaching practices and lesson characteristics. Elementary School Journal, 103, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Englert, C. S., Berry, R., & Dunsmore, K. (2001). A case study of the apprenticeship process: Another perspective on the apprentice and the scaffolding metaphor. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24,152–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erlbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Watson Moody, S., & Schumm, J. S. (2000). A meta-analytic review of the effects of instructional grouping format on the reading outcomes of students with disabilities. In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, J. S. Schumm, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 10–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Farrell, M. (2000). Educational inclusion and raising standards. British Journal of Special Education, 27, 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feldhusen, J. F., Dai, D. Y., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2000). Dimensions of competitive and cooperative learning among gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 328–342.Google Scholar
  26. Forlin, C. (2004). Promoting inclusivity in Western Australian schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 176–206.Google Scholar
  28. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Otaiba, S A., Yang, N., McMaster, K. N., Prentice, K., Kazdan, S., & Saenz. L. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuchs, L. S, Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children’s mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569–583.Google Scholar
  30. Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  31. Gardner, R., III, Cartledae, G., Seidl, B., Woolsey, M. L., Schiev, G. S., & Utley, C. (2001). Remedial and Special Education, 22, 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garduno, E. L. H. (2001). The influence of cooperative problem solving on gender differences in achievement, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward mathematics in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garrison-Harrell, L., Kamps, D., & Kravits, T. (1997). The effects of peer networks on social-communicative behaviors for students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall, S., Gay, B., & Topping, K. (1998). Peer-assisted learning beyond school. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 291–311). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Harrower, J. K. & Dunlap, G. (2001). Behavior Modification. Special Issue: Autism, Part 1, 25, 762–784.Google Scholar
  36. Heron, T. E., Villareal, D. M., Yao, M., Christianson, R. J., & Heron, K. M. (2006). Peer tutoring systems: Applications in classroom and specialized environments. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 22, 27–45.Google Scholar
  37. Hodges, J., Riccomini, P. J., Buford, R., & Herbst, M. H. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral disorders, 31, 297–311.Google Scholar
  38. Jacques, N., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (1998). Cooperative learning and social acceptance of children with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jenkins, J. R., Antil, L. R., Wayne, S. K., & Vadasy, P. F. (2003). How cooperative learning works for special education and remedial students. Exceptional Children, 69, 279–292.Google Scholar
  40. Jenkinson, J. C. (1997). Mainstream or special? Educating students with disabilities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Kauffman, J. M., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1988). Arguable assumptions underlying the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kauffman, J. M. & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.) (1995). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Kuntz, K. L., McLaughlin, T. F., & Howard, V. F. (2001). A comparison of cooperative learning and small group individualized instruction for math in a self contained classroom for elementary students with disabilities. Educational Research Quarterly, 24, 41–56.Google Scholar
  44. Lazerson, D. B. (2005). Detention home teens as tutors: A cooperative cross-age pilot project. Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 10, 7–15.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liberman, L. J., Dunn, J. M., van der Mars, H., & McCubbin, J. (2000). Peer tutors’ effects on activity levels of deaf students in inclusive elementary physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 20–39.Google Scholar
  47. McDonnell, J., Mathot-Buckner, C., Thorson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141–160.Google Scholar
  48. McMaster, K. N. & Fuchs, D. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of students with learning disabilities: An update of Tateyama-Sniezek’s review. Learning Difficulties Research & Practice, 17, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McMaster, K. N., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Using peer tutoring to present early reading failure. In J. S. Thousand, F. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: The practical guide to empowering students, teachers, and families (2nd edn.) (pp. 235–246). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. McMaster, K. N., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 22, 5–25.Google Scholar
  51. Maheady, L., Mallette, B., & Harper, G. F. (2006). Four classwide peer tutoring models: Similarities, differences, and implications for research and practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 22, 65–89.Google Scholar
  52. Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J. K., Clancy-Menchetti, J., Santi, K., Nicholsas, K., Robinson, C., & Grek, M. (2003). A comparison of teacher-directed versus peer-assisted instruction to struggling first-grade readers. Elementary School Journal, 103, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Melser, N. A. (1999). Gifted students and cooperative learning: A study of grouping strategies. Roeper Review, 21, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mitler, P. (1988, September). Intellectual trends in special education of persons with intellectual disabilities. Paper presented at the 16th World Congress of Rehabilitation International, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  56. Morgan, S. A. (2006). Introduction: Four classwide peer tutoring programs-research, recommendations for implementation, and future directions. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 22, 1–4.Google Scholar
  57. Morgan, R. L., Whorton, J. E., & Turtle, L. B. (1999). Use of peer tutoring to improve speech skills in a preschooler with a severe hearing impairment. Educational Research Quarterly, 23, 44–55.Google Scholar
  58. Mortweet, S. L., Utley, C. A., Walker, D., Dawson, H. L., Delquardri, J. C., Reddy, S. S., Greenwood, C. R., Hamilton, S., & Ledford, D. (1999). Classwide peer tutoring: Teaching students with mild mental retardation in inclusive classrooms. Exceptional Children, 65, 524–536.Google Scholar
  59. Neber, H., Finsterwalk, M., & Urban, N. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and high-achieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nesbit, W. (1994). Inclusive education: Views of a grammarian, not a poet. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 9, 119–130.Google Scholar
  61. Patrick, H., Bangel, N. J., Jeon, K-N., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2005). Reconsidering the issues of cooperative learning with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 90–110.Google Scholar
  62. Pavri, S. & Monda-Amaya, L. (2001). Social support in inclusive schools: Student and teacher perspectives. Exceptional Children, 67, 391–411.Google Scholar
  63. Piercy, M., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate-severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ramsay, S. G. & Richards H. C. (1997). Cooperative learning environments: Effects on academic attitudes of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robertson, J., Green, K., Alper, S., Schloss, P. J., & Kohler, F. (2003). Using a peer-mediated intervention to facilitate children’s participation in inclusive childcare activities. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 182–197.Google Scholar
  66. Robinson, A. (1991). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9–27.Google Scholar
  67. Robinson, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and high ability students. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd edn., pp. 282–292). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  68. Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ross, J. A. & Smyth, E. (1995). Thinking skills for gifted students: The case for correlational reasoning. Roeper Review, 17, 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ryan, S. & Paterna, L. (1997). Junior high can be inclusive: Using natural supports and cooperative learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 36–41.Google Scholar
  71. Ryan, J. B., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. H. (2004). Peer-mediated intervention studies on academic achievement for students with EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sáenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 231–247.Google Scholar
  73. Samaha, N. V. & De Lisi, R. (2000). Peer collaboration on a nonverbal reasoning task by urban, minority students. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sheppard, S. & Kavevsky, L. S. (1999). Nurturing gifted students’ metacognitive awareness: Effects of training in homogeneous and heterogeneous classes. Roeper Review, 21, 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spencer, V. G. (2006). Peer tutoring and students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A review of the literature. Behavior Disorders, 31, 204–222.Google Scholar
  76. Stainback, S., Stainback, W., & Ayres, B. (1996). Schools as inclusive communities. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (2nd edn., pp. 31–43). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  77. Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Gunter, P. L. (2000). The effectiveness of cooperative learning with students with emotional and behavioural disorders: A literature review. Behavior Disorders, 25, 225–238.Google Scholar
  78. Topping K. (1998). Paired learning in literacy. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 87–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.Google Scholar
  79. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology. Special Issue: Developments in educational psychology: How far have we come in 25 years? 25, 631–645.Google Scholar
  80. Topping, K. T. & Bryce, A. (2004). Cross-age peer tutoring of reading and thinking: Influence on thinking skills. Educational Psychology, 24, 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Topping, K. T. & Ehly, S. (Eds.) (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.Google Scholar
  82. Vlachou, A. (2004). Education and inclusive policy-making: Implications for research and practice. International Journal on Inclusive Education, 8, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vlachou, A. & Barton, L. (1994). Inclusive education: Teachers and the changing culture of schooling. British Journal of Special Education, 21, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Walker, H. M., Forness, S. R. Kauffman, J. M., Epstein, M. H. Gresham, F. M., Nelson, C. M., & Strain, P. S. (1998). Macro-social validation: Referencing outcomes in behavioral disorders to societal issues and problems. Behavior Disorders, 24, 7–18.Google Scholar
  87. Warnock, M. (1978). Special education needs. The report of the committee of enquiry into the education of handicapped children and young people. London: HSMO.Google Scholar
  88. Watkins, A. F. (2002). Learning styles of African American children: A developmental consideration. Journal of Black Psychology, 28, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wedell, K. (1995). Making inclusive education ordinary. British Journal of Special Education, 22, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weiss, M. J. & Harris, S. L. (2001). Teaching social skills to people with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wolford, P. L., Heward, W. L., & Alber, S. R. (2001). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to recruit peer assistance during cooperative learning group activities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wright, J. & Cleary, K. S. (2006). Kids in the tutor seat: Building schools’ capacity to help struggling readers through a cross-age peer-tutoring program. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yetter, G., Gutkin, T. B., Saunders, A., Galloway, A. M., Sobansky, R. R., & Song, S. Y. (2006). Unstructured collaboration versus individual practice for complex problem solving: A cautionary tale. Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian F. Ashman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations