Skip to main content

Recognition and Resolution of Linguistic Conflicts: The Core to a Successful View and Schema Integration

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Systems Development

In the field of information system (IS) design and modeling the topic of integrating different views and schemata to a common conceptual schema is a central issue. Integration of two schemata means that they are compared, conflicts between them are identified and resolved, and finally the schemata are merged. Integration is often based on a global ontology that provides the valid concepts and interdependencies of a domain. In this paper we adapt the definition of ontology [8]: “An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization.”. Traditional integration techniques are often based on concept name comparison which even more motivates the use of an ontology as a domain lexicon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellström P, Carlsson S (2004) Towards an understanding of the mean-ing and the contents of a database through design and reconstruction. In: Vasilecas O et al. (eds) Proceedings of ISD’2004, pp 283-293.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellström P (2005) Using Enterprise Modeling for identification and resolution of homonym conflicts in view integration. In: Vasilecas O et al. (eds) Information Systems Development Advances in Theory, Practice and Education, Springer, pp 265-276.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellström P (2006) View integration in conceptual database design -Problems, approaches and solutions. Licentiate thesis, Karlstad Univer-sity Studies, 2006:5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellström P, Jakobsson L (2006) Towards a generic and integrated En-terprise Modeling approach to designing databases and software compo-nents. In: Nilsson A G et al. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development Bridging the Gap between Academia and Industry, Springer, pp 635-646.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fliedl G, Kop C, Mayr H C, Mayerthaler W, Winkler C (2000) Linguistically based requirements engineering The NIBA project. Data & Knowledge Engineering vol 35, pp 111-120.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gustas R, Gustiené P (2004) Towards the enterprise engineering ap-proach for information system modelling across organisational and tech-nical boundaries. In: Camp O et al. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems V, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 204-215.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gustas R, Jakobsson L (2004) Enterprise modelling of component ori-ented information system architectures. In: Fujita H, Gruhn V (eds) Pro-ceedings of SoMeT_W04, IOS Press, pp 88-102.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber T R (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifica-tions. Knowledge Acquisition vol 5, pp 199-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kop C, Mayr H C (1998) Conceptual predesign - Bridging the gap be- tween requirements and conceptual design. In: Proceedings ICRE’98, pp 90-100.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kop C, Vöhringer J, Hölbling M, Horn T, Irrasch C, Mayr H C (2005): Tool Supported Extraction of Behaviour Models. In Kaschek R et al. (eds) ISTA2005, GI Edition Lecture Notes in Informatics, pp 63-73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Métais E, Kedad Z, Comyn-Wattiau I, Bouzeghoub M (1996) Implemen-tation of a third generation view integration tool. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Applications of Natural Language to Data Bases.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rupp C (2004) Requirements Engineering und -Management, 3rd edition, Hanser, Vienna, pp 239ff

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turetken O at all (2004) Supporting systems analysis and design through Fisheye views. Communications of the ACM vol 47 no 9, pp 72-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vernadat F B (1996) Enterprise modeling and integration principles and applications. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vöhringer J, Mayr H C (2006) Integration of schemas on the pre- conceptual level using the KCPM-approach. in: Nilsson A G et al. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development Bridging the Gap between Academia and Industry, Springer, pp 623-634.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bellström, P., Vöhringer, J., Salbrechter, A. (2007). Recognition and Resolution of Linguistic Conflicts: The Core to a Successful View and Schema Integration. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70801-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70802-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics