Examining OSS Sucess: Information Technology Acceptance by FireFox Users

  • Andrzej Slłomka
  • Tomasz Przechlewski
  • Stanislław Wrycza

Open source software (oss) is currently one of the most debated phenomena in both academia and the software industry. Several oss systems have achieved significant market success but they are rather server-side applications, such as the Apache web server, mail transport agent Sendmail, or other components of it infrastructure. On the other hand penetration of oss systems on the market of desktop applications is rather limited and it is virtually dominated by products of one software vendor, i.e. Microsoft. Recently one exception to the rule of non-existence of oss at the desktop was observed however. Mozilla FireFox, an Open Source web browser achieved 10 million downloads in one single month of December 2004, demonstrating success in the market totally dominated by Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. The aim of the paper is to find out factors, which encourage users to adopt FireFox by applying the well-known framework of Technology Acceptance Model.


Open Source Software Technology Acceptance Model User Acceptance Desktop Application Mobile Commerce 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Weber, S.: The Success of Open Source. Harvard University Press (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Free Software Foundation: Philosophy of the GNU project (2004) http://www.
  3. 3.
    AlMarzouq, M.: Open source: Concepts, benefits, and challenges. Commun. AIS 16 (2005) 1-49Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gök, A.: Open source versus proprietary software: An economic perspective (2003)
  5. 5.
    Berlecon Research: Free/libre and open source software: Survey and study (2002)
  6. 6.
    Netcraft Ltd: December 2005 web server survey (2005) http://news.netcraft. com/archives/web_server_survey.html
  7. 7.
    Wheeler, D.: Why open source? look at the numbers! (2005) http://www.
  8. 8.
    Wang, T., Wu, L., Lin, Z.: The revival of Mozilla in the browser war against Internet Explorer. In: ICEC ’05: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic commerce, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005) 159-166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    WebSideStory, Inc.:Firefox’s market share nears7percent(2005) spotlight/05- 10- 2005.html
  10. 10.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edn. Free Press (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shy, O.: The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge University Press (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual perfor- mance. MIS Quarterly (1995) 213-236Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 (1995) 144-176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.:User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 425-478Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Decision Science 35 (1989) 982-1003Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 (2000) 186-204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A.: Computer self-efficacy: Development of a mea-sure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 189-211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., Cavaye, A.L.M.: Personal computing ac-ceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21 (1997) 279-305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chin, W.W.: Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. SIGMIS Database 32 (2001) 86-112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shang, R.A., Chen, Y.C., Shen, L.: Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information and Management 42 (2005) 401-413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chau, P.Y., Lai, V.S.: An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of internet banking. Journal of Organizational Computing and Elec-tronic Commerce 13 (2003) 123-145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, J.H., Wang, S.C.: What drives mobile commerce? an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management 42 (2005) 719-429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P., Zhuang, Y.: The technology acceptance model and the world wide web. Decis. Support Syst. 29 (2000) 269-282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P., Zhuang, Y.: The role of ease of use, usefulness and attitude in the prediction of world wide web usage. In: SIGCPR ’98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press (1998) 195-204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun, H., Zhang, P.: An empirical study on the roles of affective variables in user adoption of search engines. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS. (2004)
  26. 26.
    Legris, P., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 40 (2003) 191-204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Han, S.: Individual adoption of information systems in organizations: A litera-ture review of technology acceptance model. Technical Report 540, Turku Center for Computer Science (2003)
  28. 28.
    Gallivan, M.J.: Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technolog-ical innovations: Development and application of a framework. Data Base 32 (2001) 51-85Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived easy of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (1989) 319-340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Burton-Jones, A., Hubona, G.S.: Individual differences and usage behaviour: Revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. Data Base 36 (2005) 58-77Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slomka, A.: Zastosowanie modelu tam w badaniu akceptacji technologii open- source na przykladzie przegladarki FireFox(2005) Msc thesis(in Polish). Gdansk Univ., Department of ManagementGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chin, W.W.: PLSGraph User’s Guide, version 3.0. University of Houston. (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall (1998)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 (2003) 189-217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981) 39-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Slłomka
    • 1
  • Tomasz Przechlewski
    • 1
  • Stanislław Wrycza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsGdańsk UniversityPoland

Personalised recommendations