Management Support Systems (MSS) are computer-based systems that are supposed to be used by, or at least to support, managers. A major problem in MSS development is requirements specification. There exist a large number of systems development methods (SDM) (Avison & Fitzgerald 1999; Jayaratna 1994). Watson et al. (1997) point out that there are differences between traditional SDM and MSS development methods and that the former are not very useful in MSS development. In a study focusing on the MSS development methods used by organizations in the US, Watson et al. (1997) found that only two formal methods were used, namely: the critical success factors (CSF) method (Rockart 1979) and the strategic business objectives (SBO) method (Volonino & Watson 1990-91). They, as well as other less used methods, focus primarily on specifying managers’ information needs and how an MSS can fulfill information needs. Although, they can be useful, they have one major limitation. Since they primarily focus on information needs they are not complete in generating MSS requirements. More complete needs requirements specification can be generated by focusing on managerial roles and how an MSS can support a manager’s different organizational roles. We present an MSS design approach based on a current management theory and model. In doing so, we build on three postulates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avison D, Fitzgerald G (1999) Information Systems Development. In WL Currie and B Galliers (eds.) Rethinking Management Information Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 250-278.
Bourgeois LJ, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic Decision Processes in High Veloc-ity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry. Management Science, Vol. 34, pp. 816-835.
Cameron KS (1986) Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Concep-tions of Organizational Effectiveness. Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 539-553.
Cameron KS, Quinn RE (1998) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, MA.
Carlsson SA, Hedman J (2004) From ERP Systems to Enterprise Portals. In F Adam and D Sammon (eds.), The Enterprise Resource Planning Decade: Les-sons Learned and Issues for the Future, Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 263-287.
Denison DR, Hooijberg R, Quinn RE (1995) Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership. Organization Science, Vol. 6, pp. 524-540.
George JF, Nunamaker JF, Valacich JS (1992) ODSS: Information Technology for Organizational Change. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 8, pp. 307-315.
Hart SL, Quinn RE (1993) Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, Vol. 46, pp. 543-574.
Huber GP, Sutcliffe KM, Miller CC, Glick WH (1993) Understanding and Pre-dicting Organizational Change. In GP Huber and WH Glick (eds.), Organiza-tional Change and Redesign, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 215-265.
Jayaratna N (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies. McGraw-Hill. London.
Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Lewin AY, Minton JW (1986) Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research. Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 514-538.
Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Quinn, R.E. (1988) Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn RE, Cameron KS (eds.) (1988) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Ballinger, Cambridge, UK.
Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: To-wards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis. Manage-ment Science, Vol. 29, pp. 363-377.
Quinn RE, Faerman SR, Thompson MP, McGrath MR (2004) Becoming a Master Manager, Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Rockart JF (1979) Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs. Harvard Busi-ness Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 81-93.
Simons R (1995) Levers of Control. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Sprague RH, Watson HJ (1996) Decision Support for Management. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Vandenbosch B (1999) An Empirical Analysis of the Association Between the Use of Executive Support Systems and Perceived Organizational Competive-ness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, pp. 77-92.
Volonino L, Watson HJ (1990-91) The Strategic Business Objectives Method for Guiding Executive Information Systems Development. Journal of Manage-ment Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 27-39.
Watson HJ, Houdeshel G, Rainer, RK (1997) Building Executive Information Systems and Other Decision Support Applications. Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carlsson, S.A., Hedman, J. (2007). Management Support Systems Design: A Competing Values Approach. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70801-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70802-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)