Skip to main content

Management Support Systems Design: A Competing Values Approach

  • Conference paper
  • 1092 Accesses

Management Support Systems (MSS) are computer-based systems that are supposed to be used by, or at least to support, managers. A major problem in MSS development is requirements specification. There exist a large number of systems development methods (SDM) (Avison & Fitzgerald 1999; Jayaratna 1994). Watson et al. (1997) point out that there are differences between traditional SDM and MSS development methods and that the former are not very useful in MSS development. In a study focusing on the MSS development methods used by organizations in the US, Watson et al. (1997) found that only two formal methods were used, namely: the critical success factors (CSF) method (Rockart 1979) and the strategic business objectives (SBO) method (Volonino & Watson 1990-91). They, as well as other less used methods, focus primarily on specifying managers’ information needs and how an MSS can fulfill information needs. Although, they can be useful, they have one major limitation. Since they primarily focus on information needs they are not complete in generating MSS requirements. More complete needs requirements specification can be generated by focusing on managerial roles and how an MSS can support a manager’s different organizational roles. We present an MSS design approach based on a current management theory and model. In doing so, we build on three postulates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avison D, Fitzgerald G (1999) Information Systems Development. In WL Currie and B Galliers (eds.) Rethinking Management Information Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 250-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois LJ, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic Decision Processes in High Veloc-ity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry. Management Science, Vol. 34, pp. 816-835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS (1986) Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Concep-tions of Organizational Effectiveness. Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 539-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Quinn RE (1998) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson SA, Hedman J (2004) From ERP Systems to Enterprise Portals. In F Adam and D Sammon (eds.), The Enterprise Resource Planning Decade: Les-sons Learned and Issues for the Future, Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 263-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison DR, Hooijberg R, Quinn RE (1995) Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership. Organization Science, Vol. 6, pp. 524-540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George JF, Nunamaker JF, Valacich JS (1992) ODSS: Information Technology for Organizational Change. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 8, pp. 307-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL, Quinn RE (1993) Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, Vol. 46, pp. 543-574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP, Sutcliffe KM, Miller CC, Glick WH (1993) Understanding and Pre-dicting Organizational Change. In GP Huber and WH Glick (eds.), Organiza-tional Change and Redesign, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 215-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna N (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies. McGraw-Hill. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin AY, Minton JW (1986) Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research. Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 514-538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R.E. (1988) Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE, Cameron KS (eds.) (1988) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Ballinger, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: To-wards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis. Manage-ment Science, Vol. 29, pp. 363-377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE, Faerman SR, Thompson MP, McGrath MR (2004) Becoming a Master Manager, Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockart JF (1979) Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs. Harvard Busi-ness Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 81-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons R (1995) Levers of Control. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague RH, Watson HJ (1996) Decision Support for Management. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbosch B (1999) An Empirical Analysis of the Association Between the Use of Executive Support Systems and Perceived Organizational Competive-ness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, pp. 77-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volonino L, Watson HJ (1990-91) The Strategic Business Objectives Method for Guiding Executive Information Systems Development. Journal of Manage-ment Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 27-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson HJ, Houdeshel G, Rainer, RK (1997) Building Executive Information Systems and Other Decision Support Applications. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carlsson, S.A., Hedman, J. (2007). Management Support Systems Design: A Competing Values Approach. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-70801-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-70802-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics