Building the Enterprise Architecture: A Bottom-Up Evolution?

  • Hakan P. Sundberg

Organisations today have information systems that support many tasks, such as decision-making, co-ordination, control, analysis and development (Pereira and Sousa, 2004). However, most enterprises are burdened with a vast array of computers and applications that are linked together through a variety of ad-hoc mechanisms.


Business Process Business Organisation Enterprise Architecture Architecture Process Information Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boster M, Liu S, Thomas R (2000) Getting the Most from Your Enterprise Archi-tecture. IT Pro, IEEE Computer Society, July-August 2000, pp 43-50Google Scholar
  2. Britton C, Bye P (2004) IT Architectures and Middleware Strategies for Building Large Integrated Systems, Second edition. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Cummins FA (2002) Enterprise Integration - An Architecture for Enterprise Ap-plication and Systems Integration. Wiley Computer Publishing, New York Chichester Weinheim Brisbane Singapore TorontoGoogle Scholar
  4. Erder M, Pureur P (2003) QFD in the Architecture Development Process. IT Pro, IEEE Computer Society, November-December 2003, pp 44-52Google Scholar
  5. Erder M, Pureur P (2004) Defining Business Requirements Quickly and Accu-rately. IT Pro, IEEE Computer Society, July-August 2004, pp 51-56Google Scholar
  6. Evernden R, Evernden E (2003) Third-Generation Information Architecture. Communications of the ACM, vol 46, no 3, pp 95-98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaisler H, Armour F, Valivullah M (2005) Enterprise Architecting: Critical Prob-lems. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1-10Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) The Strategy-Focused Organization - How bal-anced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Knox S, Maklan S, Payne A, Peppard J and Ryals L (2003) Customer Relationship Management - Perspectives from the marketplace. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, no 18, pp 122-136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartman J, (1998) Vetenskapligt tänkande Från kunskapsteori till metodteori. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  12. Nuseibeh B (2001) Weaving Together Requirements and Architectures. In IT Pro, IEEE Computer Society, March 2001, pp 115-117Google Scholar
  13. Pereira CM, Sousa P (2004) A Method to Define an Enterprise Architecture using the Zachman Framework. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Ap-plied Computing, pp 1366-1371Google Scholar
  14. Rentzhog O (1998) Processorientering: En grund för morgondagens organisationer. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  15. Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I, Booch G (2005) The Unified Modelling Language, Sec-ond Edition, Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Sundberg HP, Wallin P (2005) Co-ordination of Business and IT Development Processes - Managing Stovepiped Organisations. International Journal of Public Information Systems, vol 2005:1, pp 53-69Google Scholar
  17. Whitman L, Ramachandran K, Ketkar V (2001) A Taxonomy of a Living Model of the Enterprise. Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, pp 848-855Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hakan P. Sundberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Technology and MediaMid Sweden UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations