Directing and Enacting the Information System

  • Björn Abelli
Conference paper

Information existed long before the development of computers and software. Systems for handling this information existed as well, with different technologies in use (cuneiform, petroglyphs, Gutenberg’s printing press, etc). Even further back in time, long before humans could use written language, they could communicate information and knowledge through myths and rituals. These rituals may be some of the first constructed information systems. Hunting stories and other extraordinary events became part of the stories told, and when they were acted out in a drama separated from all ceremonial concerns, a first significant step had been taken toward theatre as a specialized activity. The development process of a theatre production could hence be seen as one of the most genuine models for development of manual information systems. (Brocket 1987; Abelli and Révay 2004)


Manual Information System Theatre Production Team Meeting Executive Board Base Information System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abelli B (2006) Enacting the e-Society. Proceedings of IADIS International Con-ference e-Society 2006, Dublin, Ireland, 285-298Google Scholar
  2. Abelli B, Révay P (2004) To Be or Not To Be Computer Based. Proceedings of microCAD 2004 International Scientific Conference, Miskolc, Hungary, 1-8Google Scholar
  3. Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassGoogle Scholar
  4. Brocket OG (1987) History of the Theatre, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. DSDM Consortium (2002) Dynamic Systems Development Method, Version 4.1. eWay Limited, Ashford, Kent, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Firesmith DG, Henderson-Sellers B (2002) The OPEN Process Framework: An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  7. Hugoson M-Å, Hesselmark O, Grubbström A (1983) MBI-metoden - En metod för verksamhetsanalys. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobson I (1992) Object-Oriented Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Kemecsi F (1998) Skådespelarens skapande process enligt Stanislavskij-metoden. Liber, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  10. Lundgren UP (1996) Pedagogisk uppslagsbok. Från A till Ö utan pekpinnar. Lärarförbundet/Informationsförlaget., StockholmGoogle Scholar
  11. Rational Software Corporation (2003) Rational Unified Process. 2003.06.00.65 edn. Rational Software Corporation, Cupertino, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Révay P (1977) RAS - SIS’ handbok 113 - i teoretisk och praktisk belysning. De-partment of Information Processing. The Royal Institute of Technology and The University of Stockholm, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  13. Wieringa RJ (1995) Combining Static and Dynamic Modelling Methods: A Com-parison of Four Methods. The Computer Journal 38:17-30Google Scholar
  14. Wigander K-O, Svensson Å, Schoug L, Rydin A, Dahlgren C (1979) Strukturerad analys och konstruktion av informationsbehandlingssystem. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  15. Viller S, Sommerville I (2000) Ethnographically informed analysis for software engineers. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 53:169-196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Abelli
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessMälardalen UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations