Improving Trust in E-Government Through Paralingual Web Design

  • Roy Segovia
  • Murray E. Jennex
Conference paper

Can web design improve electronic government (e-government)? This paper proposes that the use of paralingual web design can overcome the largest issue in e-government, that of trust, when used with bilingual populations. An experiment was conducted where e-government web pages were converted to paralingual format with site visitors surveyed on their resulting trust in the content and readability. Readability was surveyed to ensure that paralingual format did not reduce site usability (in this case usability can only be viewed as readability as no other functions are possible using the web sites.) The results of the experiment show that trust was improved for the minority language speakers with the majority language speakers remaining neutral. This is important for societies with large bilingual populations with issues of trust between them and the majority speakers.


Political Trust Language Choice Minority Speaker Bilingual Population Paralingual Page 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Coleman, S., and Gøtze, J, (2001). Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. Hansard Society, London. Retrieved October 4, 2005 from
  2. Grönlund, A. and Horan, T. A. (2004). Introducing E-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15: 713-729.Google Scholar
  3. Hart-Teeter. “The New E-government Equation: Ease, Engagement, Privacy and Protection,” A report prepared for the Council for Excellence in Government, 2003.RetrievedNovember27,2005from
  4. Hibbing, J.R. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans' Be-liefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Levi, M. and Stoker, L., (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475-507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mercuri, R.T. (May 2005). Trusting in Transparency. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 48(5): 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), (2001). Citizens as Partners, Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making.Google Scholar
  8. Rosell, S., Gantwerk, H., and Furth, I., (2005). Listening To Californians: Bridg-ing The Disconnect. Viewpoint Learning, Inc. Retrieved January 15, 2006 from
  9. Schneider, Gary P. (2003). Electronic Commerce, Fourth Annual Edition. Thomson Course Technology, Boston.Google Scholar
  10. United States Office of Management and Budget (USOMB), (2005), E-Gov: Pow-ering America’s Future With Technology. Retrieved October 5, 2005 from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy Segovia
  • Murray E. Jennex

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations