Socio-Technical Perspectives on Design Science in IS Research

  • Jörg Becker
  • Björn Niehaves
  • Christian Janiesch

In information systems (IS) research major problems are discussed in literature, often regarded as crucial for the identity and existence of the discipline itself (Benbasat and Zmud 2003).


Information System Design Science Information System Research Design Science Research Information System Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Applegate LM, King JL (1999) Rigor and relevance: careers on the line. MIS Quarterly 23:17-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banville C, Landry M (1989) Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined? Communica-tions of the ACM 32:48-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Benbasat I, Zmud RW (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. MIS Quarterly 23:3-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benbasat I, Zmud RW (2003) The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defin-ing and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties. MIS Quarterly 27:183-194.Google Scholar
  6. Boland R (1989) The Experience of System Design: A Hermeneutic of Organiza-tional Action. Scandinavian Journal of Management 5:87-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostrom R, Heinen JS (1977) MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Per-spective. MIS Quarterly 3.Google Scholar
  8. Brooke C (2002) Critical Perspectives on Information Systems: An Impression of the Research Landscape. Journal of Information Technology 17:271-283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft Systems Methodologies in Action. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  10. Churchman CW (1979) The Systems Approach. Dell, New York/NY.Google Scholar
  11. Darke P, Shanks G, Broadbent M (1998) Successfully completing case study re-search: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8:273-289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer G, Nakakoji K, Ostwaldl J (1995) Supporting the evolution of design arti-facts with representations of context and intent. Symposium on Designing In-teractive Systems archive: Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods & Techniques (DIS 1995), Ann Arbor, MI, pp 7-15.Google Scholar
  13. Galliers RD (1997) Reflections on Information Systems research: twelve points of debate. In: Mingers J, Stowell F (eds). Information Systems Research: An Emerging Discipline. London, pp 141-157.Google Scholar
  14. Heller F (1997) Sociotechnology and the Environment. Human Relations 50:605-624.Google Scholar
  15. Hevner AR, March TS, Park J, Sudha R (2004) Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28:75-105.Google Scholar
  16. Hirschheim R, Newman M (1991) Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research 2:29-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keen PGW (1980) MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradi-tion. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Sys-tems. Philadelphia/PA, pp 9-18.Google Scholar
  18. Knights D, Murray F (1994) Managers Divided. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  19. Lee AS (2000) Systems Thinking, Design Science, and Paradigms. Heeding Three Lessons from the Past to Resolve Three Dilemmas in the Present to Direkt a Trajectory for Future Research in the Information Systems Field (Keynote Speech). 11th International Conference on Information Management, Kaohsi-ung, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  20. Lyytinen K (1999) Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research. MIS Quarterly 23:25-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. March TS, Smith G (1995) Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15:251-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markus ML, Davenport TH (1999) Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly 23:19-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGrath K (2005) Doing Critical Research in Information Systems: A Case of Theory and Practice Not Informing Each Other. Information Systems Journal 15:85-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodol-ogy. Information Systems Research 12:240-259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mumford E, Weir M (1979) Computer Systems in Work Design - The ETHICS Method. Associated Business Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Niehaves B (2005) Epistemological Perspectives on Pluralist IS Research. 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  27. Nunamaker JF, Chen M, Purdin TDM (1991) Systems Development in Informa-tion Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7:89-106.Google Scholar
  28. Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12:121-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossi M, Sein M (2003) Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Ap-proach. IRIS 2003, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  30. Scheer A-W (2000) ARIS-Business Process Modeling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  31. Simon H (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Walls J, Widmeyer G, El Sawy O (1992) Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3:36-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber R (1987) Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Basis for Informa-tion Systems Research. Journal of Information Systems 1:3-19.Google Scholar
  34. Weber R (2003) Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact. MIS Quarterly 27:iii-xi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Becker
    • 1
  • Björn Niehaves
    • 1
  • Christian Janiesch
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Center for Information SystemsGermany

Personalised recommendations