Advertisement

Knowledge and Decision-Making within Software Projects

  • Birinder Sandhawalia
  • Darren Dalcher

The effective use of knowledge results in better decision-making within projects. Moreover, the unpredictable nature of software projects and the need for effective communication within project teams requires a framework for social interaction and feedback that results in better decision-making. This paper analyses the creation and capture of knowledge within software development projects and discusses the central role of decision making in the development process, and how the effective use of knowledge helps improve decision-making. The paper views how the knowledge generated and decisions made within a software project can be provided greater visibility and communicated effectively, and to achieve this, presents a framework to facilitate social interaction and feedback during the development process.

Keywords

Software Development Knowledge Management Software Project Functional Area Software Development Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alavi M and Leidner DE (1999) ‘Knowledge Management Systems: Is-sues, Challenges and Benefits,’ Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol 1, Article 7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) (1996), Knowledge Management: Consortium Benchmarking Study Final Report; Available from http://www.store.apqc.org/reports/Summary/know-mng.pdf
  3. 3.
    Bredillet CN (2004) ‘Projects are Producing the Knowledge which are Producing the Projects……’ Proceedings of IPMA, Budapest.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtis B, Krasner H, and Iscoe N (1988) ‘A Field Study for the Software Design Process for Large Systems,’ Communications of the ACM., Vol 31, No 11, pp 68-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalcher D (2003) Computing Project Management, Middlesex University Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dalcher D (2003a) ‘Software Development for Dynamic Systems.’ De- velopments in Metainformatics. LNCS, Springer Verlag, Peter J Nurn- berg (ed): pp 58-75.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davenport TH and Prusak L (1998) ‘Working Knowledge,’ Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis RC (1999) ‘The Fundamentals of Top Management,’ New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951, (quoted in Cleland DI. Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, p-3.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dym C L and Little P (2000) ‘Engineering Design: A Project Based Introduction.’ John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, and Neale MA, (1996) ‘Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Infor-mation Distribution Affect Process and Performance,’ Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, Vol 67, pp 1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson RA (1993) ‘Negotiation Basics,’ Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koskinen KU (2004) ‘Knowledge Management to Improve Project Communication and Implementation,’ Project Management Journal, Vol 35, No 1, pp 13-19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meredith JR and Mantel JS (1995) ‘Project Management: A Managerial Approach,’ Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Myers W (1985) ‘MCC: Planning the Revolution in Software,’ IEEE Software.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) ‘The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation,’ Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nutt PC (1989) ‘Making Tough Decisions,’ Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polanyi M (1967) ‘The Tacit Dimension,’ Routledge and Keon Paul, London.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Politis JD (2003) ‘The Connection between Trust and Knowledge Man- agement: What are its Implications for Team Performance,’ Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 7, No 5, pp 55-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pressman RS(1997)‘Software Engineering- A Practitioner’s Ap- proach,’ The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simon H A (1977) ‘The New Science of Management Decision,’ Pren-tice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walz DB, Elam JJ and Curtis B (1993) ‘Inside a Software Design Team: Knowledge Acquisition, Sharing and Integration,’ Communications of the ACM, Vol 36, No 10, pp 63-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birinder Sandhawalia
    • 1
  • Darren Dalcher
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing ScienceMiddlesex UniversityTrent ParkUK

Personalised recommendations