Packaging of Food Products

  • Vickie A. Vaclavik
  • Elizabeth W. Christian
Part of the Food Science Texts Series book series (FSTS)


Packaging Material Modify Atmosphere Packaging Edible Film Vacuum Packaging Active Packaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrante MA. The brave new world of packaging technology at Pack Expo 96. Food Engineer 1996; 68(10): 99–102}.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sloan AE. The silent salesman. Food Technol 1996; 50(12): 25.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steel Cans. A Steel-in-Packaging Report from the Committee of Tin Mill Products Producers. American Iron and Steel Institute.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franklin Associates, Ltd. A comparison of energy consumption by the plastics industry to total energy consumption in the United States, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Society for Research into the Packaging Market (Germany). Packaging without plastic; ecological and economic consequences of a packaging market free from plastic, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Testin RF, Vergano PJ. Plastic packaging opportunities and challenges. January 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Factoring source reduction into recycling costs. Proceedings of Recycle ’93, Sixth Annual Forum (Davos, Switzerland), 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franklin Associates, Ltd. Resource and environmental profile analysis of polyethylene and unbleached paper grocery sacks. 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Russell M. High-performance films. Food Engineer 1995; 67(9): 139–146}.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Maire WH. The PET revolution comes to food. Food Engineer 1994; 66(8): 62.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franklin Associates Ltd. Resource and environmental profile analysis of foam polystyrene and bleached paperboard containers. 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Higgins KT. Not just a pretty face. Food Engineer 2000; 72(5): 74–77}.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krochta JM, DuMulder-Johnston C. Edible and biodegradable polymer films: Challenges and opportunities. A publication of the Institute of Food Technologists’ Expert Panel on Food Safety and Nutrition. Food Technol 1997; 51(2): 61–74}.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Labuza TP. An introduction to active packaging for foods. Food Technol 1996; 50(4): 68–71}.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brody AL. Smart packaging becomes Intellipac^ˆledR. Food Technol 2000; 54(6): 104–106}.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pszczola DE. Packaging takes an active approach. Food Technol 1995; 49(8): 104.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Higgins KT. Active packaging gets a boost. Food Engineer 2001; 73(10): 20.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferrante MA. Flexible packaging. Striking it right. Food Engineer 1999; 71(2): 57–61}.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferrante MA. Keeping it flexible. Food Engineer 1996; 68(9): 143–150}.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Higgins KT. Security takes center stage. Food Engineer 2001; 73(12): 20.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Russell M. Peak packaging performance. Food Engineer 1994; 66(10): 100–107}.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dallas County Sheriff’s Department. Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martin K. Safety and convenience take center stage. Food Engineer 1999; 71(11): 79–86}.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paperboard Packaging Council. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Regal Molle Group. Norway.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brody AL. Integrating aseptic and modified atmosphere packaging to fulfill a vision of tomorrow. Food Technol 1996; 50(4): 56–66}.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Higgons K. 21st Annual packaging trends survey: Processors invest in smart technologies. Food Engineer 2006; 78 (10) 68–74.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tufts University Diet and Nutrition Letter. The bigger the package, the more you eat. 1997; 14(11): 1–2}.Google Scholar
  30. American Packaging Corporation, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  31. Blumenthal MM. How packaging affects food flavor. Food Technol 1997; 51(1): 71–74.Google Scholar
  32. Dow Chemical Co. Midland MI (PVDC).Google Scholar
  33. DuPont Co. Wilmington, DE (PET, eng. grade).Google Scholar
  34. Eastman Chemical Co. Kingsport TN (PCT, PET std. grade).Google Scholar
  35. Innovation Packaging. Macedonia, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Potter N, Hotchkiss J. Food Science, 5th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  37. Regal Moell Group. Norway.Google Scholar
  38. Reynolds Metals Co. Flexible Packaging Division. Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
  39. Tetra Pak. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vickie A. Vaclavik
    • 1
  • Elizabeth W. Christian
    • 2
  1. 1.Southwestern Medical Center at DallasThe University of TexasDallasUSA
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition and Food SciencesTexas Woman’s UniversityDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations