Mandated Batterer Intervention Programs to Reduce Domestic Violence

  • Lynette Feder
  • David B. Wilson

Domestic violence is defined as assaultive behavior involving adults who are married, cohabitating, or who have an ongoing prior intimate relationship (Goolkasian, 1986). Due to the very private nature of this act, incidences of domestic assaults are less likely to come to the attention of police than are other crimes and therefore to be included in the official crime counts (Berk et al., 1984; Dutton, 1987; Hirschel et al., 1992). However, results from a number of wellregarded national studies (Straus and Gelles, 1986; Tjaden and Thoennes, 2000) indicate just how pervasive this problem continues to be.


Domestic Violence Battered Woman Abusive Partner Spouse Abuse Batterer Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, David, and Anderw McCormick. 1982. ‘‘Men unlearning violence: A group approach based on the collective model.’’ In T he Abusive Partner: An Analysis of Domestic Battering, edited by Maria Roy, 170-197. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  2. Berk, Richard, Robert Boruch, David Chambers, Peter Rossi, and Ann Witte. 1985. Social policy experimentation: A position paper. Evaluation Review 9: 387-429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk, Richard, Sarah Berk, and Phyllis Newton. 1984. Cops on call: Summoning the police to the scene of spousal violence. L aw and Society Review 18: 479-498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk, Richard, Alec Campbell, Ruth Klap, and Bruce Western. 1992. The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review 57: 698-708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Huey-tsyh, Carl Bersani, Steven Myers, and Robert Denton. 1989. Evaluating the effectiveness of a court sponsored treatment program. Journal of Family V iolence 4: 309-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, Robert, and Bruce Taylor. 1999. Does batterer treatment reduce violence? Women & Criminal Justice 10: 69-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. —— , and Christopher Maxwell. 2000. Does Batterer T reatment Reduce V iolence? A Randomized Experiment in Brooklyn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  8. Dishion, Thomas, Joan McCord, and François Poulin. 1999. When Interventions Harm: Peer Groups and Problem Behavior. American Psychologist 54: 755-764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunford, Franklyn. 2000a. Determining Program Success: The Importance of Employing Experimental Research Designs. Crime & Delinquency 46: 425-434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. —— . 2000b. The San Diego Navy Experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68: 468-476.Google Scholar
  11. Dutton, Donald. 1986. The outcome of court-mandated treatment for wife assault: A quasi-experi-mental evaluation. V iolence and V ictims 1: 163-175.Google Scholar
  12. —— . 1987. The criminal justice response to wife assault. L aw and Human Behavior 11: 189-206.Google Scholar
  13. —— , and Barbara McGregor. 1991. ‘‘The symbiosis of arrest and treatment for wife assault: The case for combined intervention.’’ In Woman Battering: Policy Responses, edited by Michael Steinman, 131-154. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
  14. Duval, Sue, and Richard Tweedie. 2000. A nonparametric ‘‘trim and fill’’ method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95: 89-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrington, David P. 1983. ‘‘Randomized experiments on crime and justice.’’ In Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of the Research. Vol. 4, edited by Michael Tonry and Norval Morris, 257-308. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Feazell, Carann, Raymond Mayers, and Jeanne Deschner. 1984. Services for men who batter: Implications for programs and policies. Family Relations 33: 217-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feder, Lynette. 1997. Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Women & Criminal Justice 8: 79-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —— , and Laura Dugan. 2002. A Test of the Efficacy of Court-Mandated Counseling for Domestic Violence Offenders: The Broward Experiment. Justice Quarterly 19: 343-375.Google Scholar
  19. Feder, Lynette, and David Forde. 2000. A T est of the EYcacy of Court-Mandated Counseling for Domestic V iolence OVenders: T he Broward Experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Ford, David, and Mary Jean Regoli. 1993. ‘‘The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters.’’ In L egal Responses to W ife Assault: Current T rends and Evaluation, edited by Zoe Hilton, 127-164. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Gondolf, Edward. 1987. Seeing through smoke and mirrors: A guide to batterer program evaluations. Response 10: 16-19.Google Scholar
  22. —— . 1997. Batterer programs: What we know and need to know. Journal of Interpersonal V iolence 12: 83-98.Google Scholar
  23. —— . 1998. Do batterer programs work? A 15 month follow-up of multisite evaluation. Domestic V iolence Report 3: 65-80.Google Scholar
  24. Goolkasian, Gail. 1986. Confronting domestic violence: T he role of criminal court judges. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  25. Hamberger, L. Kevin, and James Hastings. 1993. ‘‘Court-mandated treatment of men who assault their partner.’’ In L egal Responses to W ife Assault: Current T rends and Evaluation, edited by Zoe Hilton, 188-229. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Harrell, Adele. 1991. Evaluation of Court-Ordered T reatment for Domestic V iolence OVenders: Final Report. Washington, DC: Institute for Social Analysis.Google Scholar
  27. Hasselblad, Vic, and Larry V. Hedges. 1995. Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychological Bulletin 117: 167-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Healey, Kerry, Christine Smith, and Chris O’Sullivan. 1998. Batterer Intervention: Program Approaches and Criminal Justice Strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  29. Hirschel, J. David, Ira Hutchison, and Charles Dean. 1992. The failure of arrest to deter spouse abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 29: 7-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hotaling, Gerald, and David Sugarman. 1986. An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. V iolence and V ictims 1: 101-124.Google Scholar
  31. Jennings, Jerry. 1987. History and issues in the treatment of battering men: A case for unstructured group therapy. Journal of Family V iolence 2: 193-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, John, and Dianne Kanzler. 1993. Treating domestic violence: Evaluating the effectiveness of a domestic violence diversion program. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 15: 271-289.Google Scholar
  33. Klein, Andrew. 1997. Batterers’ Treatment. National Bulletin on Domestic V iolence Prevention 3: 1-3.Google Scholar
  34. Lipsey, Mark W., and David B. Wilson. 2001. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. McCord, Joan. 2003. Cures That Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587: 16-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer, Sally, Ralph Brown, and Maru Barrera. 1992. Group treatment program for abusive hus-bands: Long-term evaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 62: 276-283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pence, Ellen. 1983. The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. Hamline L aw Review 6: 247-275.Google Scholar
  38. Petrosino, Anthony, Carolyn Turpin-Petrosino, and James O. Finckenauer. 2000. Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons From Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight. Crime & Delinquency 4: 354-379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pirog-Good, Maureen, and Jan Stets-Kealey. 1985. Male batterers and battering prevention pro-grams: A national survey. Response 8: 8-12.Google Scholar
  40. Roberts, Albert. 1982. ‘‘A national survey of services for batterers.’’ In T he Abusive Partner: An Analysis of Domestic Battering, edited by Maria Roy, 230-243. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  41. Rumptz, Maureen, Cris Sullivan, William Davidson, and Joanna Basta. 1991. An ecological approach to tracking battered women over time. V iolence and V ictims 16: 237-244.Google Scholar
  42. Saunders, Daniel. 1988. ‘‘Wife abuse, husband abuse or mutual combat? A feminist perspective on the empirical findings.’’ In Feminist perspectives on wife abuse, edited by Kersti Yllo and Michele Bograd, 90-113. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Sherman, Lawrence W. 1992. The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating arrests for misdemeanor domestic violence. Journal of Criminal L aw and Criminology 83: 1-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snyder, Douglas, and Nancy Scheer. 1981. Predicting disposition following brief residence at a shelter for battered women. American Journal of Community Psychology 9: 559-566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Straus, Murray, and Richard Gelles. 1986. Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 465-479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sullivan, Cris, Maureen Rumptz, Rebecca Campbell, Kimberly Eby, and William Davidson. 1996. Retaining participants in longitudinal community research: A comprehensive protocol. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 32: 262-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tjaden, Patricia, and Nancy Thoennes. 2000. Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. V iolence Against Women 6: 142-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tolman, Richard, and Larry Bennett. 1990. A review of quantitative research on men who batter. Journal of Interpersonal V iolence 5: 87-118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tolman, Richard, and Jeffrey Edelson. 1995. ‘‘Intervention for men who batter: A review of research.’’ In Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes, consequences and solutions, edited by Sandra Stith and Murray Straus, 262-273. Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family Relations.Google Scholar
  50. Zorza, Joan. 2003. New Research: Broward County Experiment Shows No Benefit From Batterer Intervention Programs. Domestic V iolence Report 8: 23-25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynette Feder
  • David B. Wilson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations