Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Solvents as Vehicles for Topical Dosage Forms

  • ADRIAN WILLIAMS
Part of the Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Aspects book series (PHARMASP, volume VI)

Abstract

The selection of a vehicle can dramatically affect delivery and consequently efficacy of topical preparations. In terms of transdermal delivery, where delivering therapeutic agents for systemic effects is desired, solvents and co-solvent systems are widely used to improve both the amount and range of drugs that can be administered at therapeutic levels through the skin. Vehicles used in transdermal systems, such as patches, have recently been reviewed (Williams, 2003). In contrast, the focus of this chapter is on the use of solvents in topical dosage forms, i.e. preparations intended for a local or regional effect on the skin.

Keywords

Stratum Corneum Propylene Glycol Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Topical Formulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anigbogu ANC, Williams AC, and Barry BW. Permeation Characteristics of 8-methoxypsoralen through Human Skin; Relevance to Clinical Treatment. J Pharm Pharmacol 1996; 48: 357–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Behl CR, Flynn GL, Kurihara T, Harper N, Smith W, Higuchi WI, Ho NFH, and Pearson CL. Hydration and Percutaneous Absorption. I. Influence of Hydration on Alkanol Permeation through Hairless Mouse Skin. J Invest Dermatol 1980; 75: 346–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berner B, Mazzenga GC, Otte JH, Steffens RJ, Juang R-H, and Ebert CD. Ethanol: Water Mutually Enhanced Transdermal Therapeutic System II: Skin Permeation of Ethanol and Nitroglycerin. J Pharm Sci 1989; 78: 402–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank IH, Moloney J, Emslie AG, Simon I, and Apt C. The Diffusion of Water Across the Stratum Corneum as a Function of its Water Content. J Invest Dermatol 1984; 82: 188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brayer C, Micheau P, Bony C, Tauzin L, Pilorget H, Samperiz S, and Alessandri JL. Neonatal Accidental Burn by Isopropyl Alcohol. Archives de Pediatrie 2004; 11: 932–935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinkmann I and Muller-Goymann CC. An Attempt to Clarify the Influence of Glycerol, Propylene Glycol, Isopropyl Myristate and a Combination of Propylene Glycol and Isopropyl Myristate on Human Stratum Corneum. Pharmazie 2005; 60: 215–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucks D and Maibach HI. Occlusion does not Uniformly Enhance Penetration in vivo. Chapter 4. In: Bronaugh RL and Maibach HI (eds.). Percutaneous Absorption; Drugs—Cosmetics—Mechanisms—Methodology (3rd Edition). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Connolly M and Buckley DA. Contact Dermatitis from Propylene Glycol in ECG Electrodes, Complicated by Medicament Allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 50: 42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross SE and Roberts MS. Subcutaneous Absorption Kinetics of Interferon and other Solutes. J Pharm Pharmacol 1993; 45: 606–609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dooms-Goossens A and Degreef H. Contact Allergy to Petrolatums. 1. Sensitizing Capacity of Different Brands of Yellow and White Petrolatums, Contact Dermatitis 1983a; 9: 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dooms-Goossens A and Degreef H. Contact Allergy to Petrolatums. 2. Attempts to Identify the Nature of the Allergens, Contact Dermatitis 1983a; 9: 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dooms-Goossens A and Dooms M. Contact Allergy to Petrolatums. 3. Allergenicity Prediction and Pharmacopoeial Requirements, Contact Dermatitis 1983a; 9: 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elias, PM. Epidermal Lipids, Membranes and Keratinization. Int J Dermatol 1981; 20: 1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrar CW, Bell HK, and King CM. Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Propylene Glycol in Efudix (R) Cream. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 345–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodman M and Barry BW. Lipid-protein-Partitioning Theory (LPP) Theory of Skin Enhancer Activity: Finite dose Technique. Int J Pharm 1989; 57: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horiguchi Y, Honda T, Fujii S, Matsushima S, and Osaki Y. A Case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Propylene Alycol in an Ultrasonic Gel, Sensitized at a Leakage Skin Injury Due to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44: 681–683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keblish DJ, Zurakowski D, Wilson MG, and Chiodo CP. Preoperative Skin Preparation of the Foot and Ankle: Bristles and Alcohol are Better. Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 2005; 87A: 986–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurihara-Bergstrom T, Knutson K, De Noble LJ, and Goates CY. Percutaneous Absorption Enhancement of an Ionic Molecule by Ethanol-Water Systems in Human Skin. Pharm Res 1990; 7: 762–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobi U, Waibler E, Sterry W, and Lademann J. In Vivo Determination of the Long-Term Reservoir of the Horny Layer using Laser Scanning Microscopy. Laser Physics 2005; 15: 565–569.Google Scholar
  20. Lampe MA, Burligame AL, Whitney J, Williams ML, Brown BE, Roitman E, and Elias PM. Human Stratum Corneum Lipids; Characterisation and Regional Variations. J Lipid Res 1983; 24: 120–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lampe MA, Williams ML, and Elias PM. Human Epidermal Lipids; Characterization and Modulations During Differentiation. J Lipid Res 1983; 24: 131–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanigan RS and Yamarik TA. Final Report on the Safety Assessment of PEG-6,-8, and-20 Sorbitan Beeswax. Int J Toxicol 2001; 20: 27–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahagaokar, S. Evaluation of the Skin Sensitization Potential of White Mineral Oil, Petrolatum, and Gelled White Oil. J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol 1996; 15: 315–323.Google Scholar
  24. McKenzie AW and Stoughton RB. Method for Comparing Percutaneous Absorption of Steroids. Arch Dermatol 1962; 86: 608–610.Google Scholar
  25. Megrab NA, Williams AC, and Barry BW. Oestradiol Permeation Across Human Skin, Silastic and Snake Skin Membranes: the Effects of Ethanol/Water co-solvent Systems. Int J Pharm 1995; 116: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melnik BC, Hollmann J, Erler E, Verhoeven B, and Plewig G. Microanalytical Screening of all Major Stratum Corneum Lipids by Sequential High Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography. J Invest Dermatol 1989; 92: 231–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michaels AS, Chandrasekaran SK, and Shaw JE. Drug Permeation Through Human skin: Theory and In Vitro Experimental Measurement. AIChE J 1975; 21: 985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morimoto Y, Wada Y, Seki T, and Sugibayashi K. In Vitro Skin Permeation of Morphine Hydrochloride During the Finite Application of Penetration-Enhancing System Containing Water, Ethanol and l-menthol. Biol Pharm Bull 2002; 25: 134–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ongpipattanakul B, Burnette RR, Potts RO, and Francoeur ML. Evidence that Oleic Acid Exists in a Separate Phase within Stratum Corneum Lipids, Pharm Res 1991; 7: 350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pershing LK, Reilly CA, Corlett JL, and Crouch DJ. Effects of Vehicle on the Uptake and Elimination Kinetics of Capsaicinoids in Human Skin in Vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004; 200: 73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanojo H, BosvanGeest A, Bouwstra JA, Junginger HE, and Bodde HE. In Vitro Human Skin Barrier Perturbation by Oleic Acid: Thermal Analysis and Freeze Fracture Electron Microscopy Studies, Thermochim Acta 1997; 293: 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas NS and Panchagnula R. Transdermal Delivery of Zidovudine: Effect of Vehicles on Permeation Across Rat Skin and Their Mechanism of Action, Pharm Sci 2003; 18, 71–79.Google Scholar
  33. Turner P and Saeed Band Kelsey MC. Dermal Absorption of Isopropyl Alcohol from a Commercial Hand Rub: Implications for its Use in Hand Decontamination. J Hosp Infection 2004; 56: 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, and Lessmann H. Isopropyl Myristate Recommended for Aimed Rather than Routine Patch Testing. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 50: 242–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walkley K. Bound Water in Stratum Corneum Measured by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. J Invest Dermatol 1972; 59: 225–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang MY, Yang YY, and Heng PWS. Skin Permeation of Physostigmine from Fatty Acids-Based Formulations: Evaluating the Choice of Solvent. Int J Pharm 2005; 290: 25–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wertz PW and Downing DT. Stratum Corneum: Biological and Biochemical Considerations. In: Hadgraft J and Guy RH (eds.). Transdermal Drug Delivery: Developmental Issues and Research Initiatives. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 1989; pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  38. Wilhelm K, Surber C, and Maibach HI. Effect of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate-Induced Skin Irritation on In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption of Four Drugs. J Invest Dermatol 1991; 97: 927–932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilkes GL, Brown IA, and Wildnauer RH. The Biomechanical Properties of Skin. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 1973; 453–495.Google Scholar
  40. Williams AC. Transdermal and Topical Drug Delivery; From Theory to Clinical Practice. London, Pharmaceutical Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  41. Williams AC and Barry BW. Urea Analogues in Propylene Glycol as Penetration Enhancers in Human Skin. Int J Pharm 1989; 56: 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • ADRIAN WILLIAMS
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor of Pharmaceutics, School of PharmacyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations