Kinetochore Composition, Formation, and Organization



Highly conserved multiprotein assemblies known as kinetochores orchestrate chromosome segregation during cell division and ensure that DNA is correctly transmitted from one generation to the next. Kinetochores act directly by assembling onto chromatin regions named centromeres. Activities governed by kinetochores include establishing centromeric heterochromatin, holding sister chromatids together via centromeric cohesin, nucleating kinetochore microtubules, attaching and orienting sister chromatids to spindle microtubules, sensing the tension or occupancy resulting from chromatid–microtubule attachment, recruiting spindle checkpoint components to induce a mitotic delay when tension/occupancy is absent, separating sister chromatids along the spindle, and regulating the initiation of cytokinesis.

Kinetochore defects generate cells with abnormal numbers of chromosomes resulting in genetic disease, cancer formation/progression or even death of the cell or organism. Likely because they manage so many roles, kinetochores are some of the most complex intracellular structures known today. Understanding how kinetochores coordinate chromosome segregation requires the identification of their components and the characterization of how they assemble into a competent mechanochemical structure. This chapter discusses our current understanding of how kinetochore components recognize and assemble onto centromeric regions. We will discuss similarities and differences between both processes in various species. However, as the budding yeast and vertebrate kinetochores have been studied most intensely, their kinetochores will be discussed in greatest detail.


Fission Yeast Kinetochore Protein Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia Chromosomal Passenger Complex Kinetochore Assembly 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We wish to thank the members of the Fukagawa and De Wulf laboratories for discussions and comments. Research in the Fukagawa laboratory is supported by Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (MEXT). Research in the De Wulf laboratory is supported by the European Institute of Oncology, the Italian Association for Cancer Research, the European Molecular Biology Organization, the Association for International Cancer Research (U.K.), and the National Cancer Institute (U.S.A.).


  1. Ahmad, K., and Henikoff, S. 2001. Centromeres are specialized replication domains in heterochromatin. J. Cell Biol. 153: 101–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albertson, D.G., and Thomson, J.N. 1993. Segregation of holocentric chromosomes at meiosis in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosome Res. 1: 15–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandru, G., Uhlmann, F., Mechtler, K., Poupart, M.A., and Nasmyth, K. 2001. Phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Scc1 by polo/Cdc5 kinase regulates sister chromatid separation in yeast. Cell 105: 459–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alonso, A., Mahmood, R., Li, S., Cheung, F., Yoda, K., and Warburton, P.E. 2003. Genomic microarray analysis reveals distinct locations for the CENP-A binding domains in three human chromosome 13q32 neocentromeres. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12: 2711–2721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amor, D.J., and Choo, K.H.A. 2002. Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71: 695–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amor D.J., Kalitsis, P., Sumer, H., and Choo, K.H.A. 2004. Building the centromere: from foundation proteins to 3D organization. Trends Cell Biol. 14: 359–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrews, P.D., Ovechkina, Y., Morrice, N., Wagenbach, M., Duncan, K., Wordeman, L., and Swedlow, J.R. 2004. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell 6: 253-268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnaoutov, A., and Dasso, M. 2005. The Ran GTPase regulates kinetochore attachment in somatic cells. Cell Cycle 4: 1161–1165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker, R.E.M., Fitzgerald-Hayes, M., and O'Brien, T.C. 1989. Purification of the yeast centromere binding protein CP1 and a mutational analysis of its binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 10843–10850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bansal, P.K., Abdulle, R., and Kitagawa, K. 2004. Sgt1 associates with Hsp90: an initial step of assembly of the core kinetochore complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 8069–8079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basto, R., Scaerou, F., Mische, S., Wojcik, E., Lefebvre, C., Gomes, R., Hays, T., and Karess, R. 2004. In vivo dynamics of the rough deal checkpoint protein during Drosophila mitosis. Curr. Biol. 14: 56–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baum, M. and Clarke, L. 2000. Fission yeast homologs of human CENP-B have redundant functions affecting cell growth and chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 2852–2864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bellizzi, J.J. 3rd, Sorger, P.K., and Harrison, S.C. 2007. Crystal structure of the yeast inner kinetochore subunit Cep3p. Structure 15: 1422–1430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernat, R.L., Borisy, G.G., Rothfield, N.F., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1990. Injection of anticentromere antibodies in interphase disrupts events required for chromosome movement at mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 111: 1519–1533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernat, R.L., Delannoy, M.R., Rothfield, N.F., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1991. Disruption of centromere assembly during interphase inhibits kinetochore morphogenesis and function in mitosis. Cell 66: 1229–1238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Black, B.E., Foltz, D.R., Chakravarthy, S., Luger, K., Woods, V.L. Jr., and Cleveland, D.W. 2004. Structural determinants for generating centromeric chromatin. Nature 430: 578–582.Google Scholar
  17. Black, B.E., Jansen, L.E., Maddox, P.S., Foltz, D.R., Desai, A.B., Shah, J.V., and Cleveland, D.W. 2007. Centromere identity maintained by nucleosomes assembled with histone H3 containing the CENP-A targeting domain. Mol. Cell 25: 309–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blower, M.D., and Karpen, G.H. 2001. The role of Drosophila CID in kinetochore formation, cell-cycle progression and heterochromatin interactions. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 730–739.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blower, M.D., Sullivan, B.A., and Karpen, G.H. 2002. Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans. Dev. Cell 2: 319–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brar, G.A., Kiburz, B.M., Zhang, Y., Kim, J.E., White, F., and Amon, A. 2006. Rec8 phosphorylation and recombination promote the step-wise loss of cohesins in meiosis. Nature 441: 532–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brenner, S., Pepper, D., Berns, M.W., Tan, E., and Brinkley, B.R. 1981. Kinetochore structure, duplication and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J. Cell Biol. 91: 95–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brinkley, B.R., and Stubblefield, E. 1966. The fine structure of the kinetochore of a mammalian cell in vitro. Chromosoma 19: 28–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brinkley, B.R., Valdivia, M.M., Tousson, A., and Brenner, S.L. 1984. Compound kinetochores of the Indian muntjac: Evolution by linear fusion of unit kinetochores. Chromosoma 91: 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brock, J.K., and Bloom, K. 1994. A chromosome breakage assay to monitor mitotic forces in budding yeast. J. Cell Sci. 107: 891–902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown, M.T., Goetsch, L., and Hartwell, L.H. 1993. MIF2 is required for mitotic spindle integrity during anaphase spindle elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 123: 387–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Buchman, A.R., and Kornberg, R.D. 1990. A yeast ARS-binding protein activates transcription synergistically in combination with other weak activating factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 887–897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Buerstedde, J.M., and Takeda, S. 2006. Reviews and Protocols in DT40 Research, Vol. 40, Springer Publ. New York.Google Scholar
  28. Cai, M., and Davis, R.W. 1989. Purification of a yeast centromere-binding protein that is able to distinguish single base-pair mutations in its recognition site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 2544–2550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cai, M., and Davis, R.W. 1990. Yeast centromere binding protein CBF1, of the helix-loop-helix protein family, is required for chromosome stability and methionine prototrophy. Cell 61: 437–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Camahort, R., Li, B., Florens, L., Swanson, S.K., Washburn, M.P., and Gerton, J.L. 2007. Scm3 is essential to recruit the histone H3 variant Cse4 to centromeres and to maintain a functional kinetochore. Mol. Cell 26: 853–865.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Carrol, C.W., and Straight, A.F. 2007. Centromeric chromatin gets loaded. J. Cell Biol. 176: 735–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Catlett, M.G., and Kaplan, K.B. 2006. Sgt1p is a unique co-chaperone that acts as a client adaptor to link Hsp90 to Skp1p. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 33739–33748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Chan, G.K., Liu, S.T., and Yen, T.J. 2005. Kinetochore structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 15: 589–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cheeseman, I.M., Niessen, S., Anderson, S., Hyndman, F., Yates, J.R. III, Oegema, K., and Desai, A. 2004. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18: 2255–2268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cheeseman, I.M., Chappie, J.S., Wilson-Kubalek, E.M., and Desai, A. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127: 983–997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cheeseman, I.M, Hori, T., Fukagawa, T., and Desai, A. 2008. KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinates direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19: 587–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Chelysheva, L., Diallo, S., Vezon, D., Gendrot, G., Vrielynck, N., Belcram, K., Rocques, N., Marquez-Lema, A., Bhatt, A.M., Horlow, C., Mercier, R., Mezard, C., and Grelon, M. 2005. AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 118: 4621–4632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Chen, Y., Baker, R.E., Keith, K.C., Harris, K., Stoler, S., and Fitzgerald-Hayes, M. 2000. The N terminus of the centromere H3-like protein Cse4p performs an essential function distinct from that of the histone fold domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 7037–7048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ciferri, C., De Luca, J., Monzani, S., Ferrari, K.J., Ristic, D., Wyman, C., Stark, H., Kilmartin, J., Salmon, E.D., and Musacchio, A. 2005. Architecture of the human Ndc80-Hec1 complex, a critical constituent of the outer kinetochore. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 29088–29095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ciferri, C., Pasqualato, S., Screpanti, E., Varettti, G., Santaguida, S., Maiolica, A., Polka, J., De Luca, J.G., Dos Reis, G., De Wulf, P., Salek, M., Rappsilber, J., Moores, C.A., Salmon, E.D., and Musacchio, A. 2008. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133: 427–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Choo, K.H. 2001. Domain organization at centromere and neocentromere. Dev. Cell 1: 165–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Clarke, L., and Carbon, J. 1985. The structure and function of yeast kinetochores. Ann. Rev. Genet. 19: 29–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Clarke, A.S., Tang, T.T., Ooi, D.L., and Orr-Weaver, T.L. 2005. POLO kinase regulates the Drosophila centromere cohesion protein MEI-S332. Dev. Cell 8: 53–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Comings, D.E., and Okada, T.A. 1971. Fine structure of kinetochore in Indian muntjac. 1971. Exp. Cell Res. 67: 97–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Comings, D.E., and Okada, T.A. 1972. Holocentric chromosomes in Oncopeltus: kinetochore plates are present in mitosis but absent in meiosis. Chromosoma 37: 177–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Cooke, C.A., Bernat, R.L., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1990. CENP-B: A major human centromere protein located beneath the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 110: 1475–1488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Cooke, C.A., Heck, M.M.S., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1987. The INCENP antigens: movement from inner centromere to midbody during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 105: 2053–2067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Cooke, C.A., Schaar, B., Yen, T.J., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1997. Localization of CENP-E in the fibrous corona and outer plate of mammalian kinetochores from prometaphase through anaphase. Chromosoma 106: 446–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Craig, J.M., Earnshaw, W.C., and Vagnarelli, P. 1999. Mammalian centromeres: DNA sequence, protein composition, and role in cell cycle progression. Exp. Cell Res. 246: 249–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Dalal, Y., Furuyama, T., Vermaak, D., and Henikoff, S. 2007. Inaugural Article: Structure, dynamics, and evolution of centromeric nucleosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 15974–15981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. DeLuca, J.G., Gall, W.E., Ciferri C., Cimini, D., Musacchio, A., and Salmon, E.D. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127: 969–982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Desai, A., Rybina, S., Muller-Reichert, T., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A., Hyman, A., and Oegema, K. 2003. KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 17: 2421–2435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. De Wulf, P., McAinsh, A.D., and Sorger, P.K. 2003. Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev. 17: 2902–2921.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ding, R., McDonald, K. L., and McIntosh, J. R. 1993. Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of mitotic spindles from the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Biol. 120: 141–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Doheny, K.F., Sorger, P.K., Hyman, A.A., Tugendreich, S., Spencer, F., and Hieter, P. 1993. Identification of essential components of the S. cerevisiae kinetochore. Cell 73: 761–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Dong, Y., Vanden Beldt, K.J., Meng X., Khodjakov, A., and McEwen, B.F. 2007. The outer plate in vertebrate kinetochores is a flexible network with multiple microtubule interactions. Nat. Cell Biol. 9: 516–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Earnshaw, W.C., Bernat, R.L., Cooke, C.A., and Rothfield, N.F. 1991. The role of the centromere/ kinetochore in cell cycle control. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 56: 675–685.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Earnshaw, W.C., and Cooke, C.A. 1991. Analysis of the distribution of the INCENPs throughout mitosis reveals the existence of a pathway of structural changes in the chromosomes during metaphase and early events in cleavage furrow formation. J. Cell Sci. 98: 443–461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Earnshaw, W.C., Halligan, N., Cooke, C., and Rothfield, N. 1984. The kinetochore is part of the chromosome scaffold. J. Cell Biol. 98: 352–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Earnshaw, W.C., and Migeon, B. 1985. A family of centromere proteins is absent from the latent centromere of a stable isodicentric chromosome. Chromosoma 92: 290–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Earnshaw, W.C., and Rothfield, N. 1985. Identification of a family of human centromere proteins using autoimmune sera from patients with scleroderma. Chromosoma 91: 313–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Earnshaw, W.C., Sullivan, K.F., Machlin, P.S., Cooke, C.A., Kaiser, D.A., Pollard, T.D., Rothfield, N.F., and Cleveland, D.W. 1987. Molecular cloning of cDNA for CENP-B, the major human centromere autoantigen. J. Cell Biol. 104: 817–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Emanuele, M.J., McCleland, M.L., Satinover, D.L., and Stukenberg, P.T. 2005. Measuring the stoichiometry and physical interactions between components elucidates the architecture of the vertebrate kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell 16: 4882–4892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Feng, J., Huang, H., and Yen, T.J. 2006. CENP-F is a novel microtubule-binding protein that is essential for kinetochore attachments and affects the duration of the mitotic checkpoint delay. Chromosoma 115: 320–329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Fleig, U., Sen-Gupta, M., and Hegemann, J.H. 1996. Fission yeast mal2+ is required for chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell Biol. 16: 6169–6177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Fodde, R., Kuipers, J., Rosenberg, C., Smits, R., Kielman, M., Gaspar, C., van Es, J.H., Breukel, C., Wiegant, J., Giles, R.H., and Clevers, H. 2001. Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 433–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Foltz, D., Jansen, L.E., Black, B.E., Bailey, A.O., Yates, J.R. III, and Cleveland, D.W. 2006. The human CENP-A centromeric nucleosome-associated complex. Nature Cell Biol. 8: 458–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Fukagawa, T., Mikami, Y., Nishihashi, A., Regnier, V., Haraguchi, T., Hiraoka, Y., Sugata, N., Todokoro, K., Brown, W., and Ikemura, T. 2001. CENP-H, a constitutive centromere component, is required for centromere targeting of CENP-C in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 20: 4603–4617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Fujita, Y., Hayashi, T., Kiyomitsu, T., Toyoda, Y., Kokubu, A., Obuse, C., and Yanagida, M. 2007. Priming of centromere for CENP-A recruitment by human hMis18alpha, hMis18beta, and M18BP1. Dev. Cell 12: 17–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Furuyama, T., and Henikoff, S. 2006. Biotin-tag affinity purification of a centromeric nucleosome assembly complex. Cell Cycle 5: 1269–1274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Gillis, A.N., Thomas, S., Hansen, S.D., and Kaplan, K.B. 2005. A novel role for the CBF3 kinetochore-scaffold complex in regulating septin dynamics and cytokinesis. J. Cell. Biol. 171: 773–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Gimelli, G., Zuffardi, O., Giglio, S., Zeng, C., and He, D. 2000. CENP-G in neocentromeres and inactive centromeres. Chromosoma 109: 328–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Goh, P.Y., and Kilmartin, J.V. 1993. NDC10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 121: 503–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Goshima, G., Kiyomitsu, T., Yoda, K., and Yanagida, M. 2003. Human centromere chromatin protein hMis12, essential for equal segregation, is independent of CENP-A loading pathway. J. Cell Biol. 160: 25–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Gregan, J., Riedel, C.G., Pidoux, A.L., Katou, Y., Rumpf, C., Schleiffer, A., Kearsey, S.E., Shirahige, K., Allshire, R.C., and Nasmyth, K. 2007. The kinetochore proteins pcs1 and mde4 and heterochromatin are required to prevent merotelic orientation. Curr. Biol. 17: 1190–1200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Griffis, E.R., Stuurman, N., and Vale, R.D. 2007. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 177: 1005–1015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hagan, I., and Yanagida, M. 1990. Novel potential mitotic motor protein encoded by the fission yeast cut7+ gene. Nature 347: 563–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hamant, O., Golubovskaya, I., Meeley, R., Fiume, E., Timofejeva, L., Schleiffer, A., Nasmyth, K., and Cande, W.Z. 2005. A REC8-dependent plant Shugoshin is required for maintenance of centromeric cohesion during meiosis and has no mitotic functions. Curr. Biol. 15: 948-954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hayashi, A., Asakawa, H., Haraguchi, T., and Hiraoka, Y. 2006. Reconstruction of the kinetochore during meiosis in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 5173–5184.Google Scholar
  80. Hayashi, T., Fujita, Y., Iwasaki, O., Adachi, Y., Takahashi, K., and Yanagida, M. 2004. Mis16 and Mis18 are required for CENP-A loading and histone deacetylation at centromeres. Cell 118: 715–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hayashi, I., and Ikura M. 2003. Crystal structure of the amino-terminal microtubule-binding domain of end-binding protein 1 (EB1). J. Biol. Chem. 278: 36430–36434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. He, D., and Brinkley, B.R. 1996. Structure and dynamic organization of centromeres/prekinetochores in the nucleus of mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci. 109: 2693–2704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. He, D., Zeng, C., Woods, K., Zhong, L., Turner, D., Busch, R.K., Brinkley, B.R., and Busch, H. 1998. CENP-G: a new centromeric protein that is associated with the alpha-1 satellite DNA subfamily. Chromosoma 107: 189–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Hegemann, J.N., and Fleig, U.N. 1993. The centromere of budding yeast. BioEssays 15: 451–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Heit R., Underhill, D.A., Chan, G., and Hendzel, M.J. 2006. Epigenetic regulation of centromere formation and kinetochore function. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84: 605–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Hendzel, M.J., and Davie, J.R. 1990. Nucleosomal histones of transcriptionally active/competent chromatin preferentially exchange with newly synthesized histones in quiescent chicken erythrocytes. Biochem. J. 271: 67–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Henikoff, S., Ahmad, K., and Malik, H.S. 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293: 1098–1102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Henikoff, S., Ahmad, K., Platero, J.S., and van Steensel, B. 2000. Heterochromatic deposition of centromeric histone H3-like proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 716–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Heun, P., Erhardt, S., Blower, M.D., Weiss, S., Skora, A.D., and Karpen, G.H. 2006. Mislocalization of the Drosophila centromere-specific histone CID promotes formation of functional ectopic kinetochores. Dev. Cell 10: 303–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Heus, J.J., Zonneveld, B.J., de Steensma, H.J., and van den Berg, J.A. 1993. The consensus sequence of Kluyveromyces lactis centromeres shows homology to functional centromeric DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 236: 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Hieter, P., Mann, C., Snyder, M., and Davis, R.W. 1985. Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell 40: 381–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Hill, A., and Bloom, K. 1989. Acquisition and processing of a conditional dicentric chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 1368–1370.Google Scholar
  93. Hoffman, D.B., Pearson, C.G., Yen, T.J., Howell, B.J., and Salmon, E.D. 2001. Microtubule- dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at ptk1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 1995–2009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Hori, T., Haraguchi, T., Hiraoka, Y., Kimura, H., and Fukagawa, T. 2003. Dynamic behavior of Nuf2-Hec1 complex that localizes to the centrosome and centromere and is essential for mitotic progression in vertebrate cells. J. Cell Sci. 116: 3347–3362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Hori, T., Okada, M., Maenaka, K., and Fukagawa, T. 2008. CENP-O-class proteins form a stable complex and are required for proper kinetochore function. Mol. Biol. Cell 19: 843–854.Google Scholar
  96. Howell, B.J., Hoffman, D.B., Fang, G., Murray, A.W., and Salmon, E.D. 2000. Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 150: 1233–1250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Howell, B.J., McEwen, B.F., Canman, J.C., Hoffman, D.B., Farrar, E.M., Rieder, C.L., and Salmon, E.D. 2001. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155: 1159–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Howell, B.J., Moree, B., Farrar, E.M., Stewart, S., Fang, G., and Salmon, E.D. 2004. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14: 953–964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Howman, E.V., Fowler, K.J., Newson, A.J., Redward, S., MacDonald, A.C., Kalitsis, P., and Choo, K.H. 2000. Early disruption of centromeric chromatin organization in centromere protein A (Cenpa) null mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 1148–1153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Hoyt, M.A., Stearns, T., and Botstein, D. 1990. Chromosome instability mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are defective in microtubule mediated processes. Mol. Cell Biol. 10: 223–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Hudson, D.F., Fowler, K.J., Earle, E., Saffery, R., Kalitsis, P., Trowell, H., Hill, J., Wreford, N.G., de Kretser, D.M., Cancilla, M.R., Howman, E., Hii, L., Cutts, S.M., Irvine, D.V., and Choo, K.H. 1998. Centromere protein B null mice are mitotically and meiotically normal but have lower body and testis weights. J. Cell Biol. 141: 309–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Hyland, K.M., Kingsbury, J., Koshland, D., and Hieter, P. 1999. Ctf19p: A novel kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a potential link between the kinetochore and mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 145: 15–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Indjeian, V.B., Stern, B.M., and Murray, A.W. 2005. The centromeric protein Sgo1 is required to sense lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Science 307: 130–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Izuta, H., Ikeno, M., Suzuki, N., Tomonaga, T., Nozaki, N., Obuse, C., Kisu, Y., Goshima, N., Nomura, F., Nomura, N., and Yoda, K. 2006. Comprehensive analysis of the ICEN (Interphase Centromere Complex) components enriched in the CENP-A chromatin of human cells. Genes Cells 11: 673–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Janke, C., Ortiz, J., Lechner, J., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A., Magiera, M.M., Schramm, C., and Schiebel, E. 2001. The budding yeast proteins Spc24p and Spc25p interact with Ndc80p and Nuf2p at the kinetochore and are important for kinetochore clustering and checkpoint control. EMBO J. 20: 777–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Jansen, L.E., Black, B.E., Foltz, D.R., and Cleveland, D.W. 2007. Propagation of centromeric chromatin requires exit from mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 176: 795–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Javerzat, J.P., Cranston, G., and Allshire, R.C. 1996. Fission yeast genes which disrupt mitotic chromosome segregation when overexpressed. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4676–4683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Joglekar, A.P., Bouck, D.C., Molk, J.N., Bloom, K.S., and Salmon, E.D. 2006. Molecular architecture of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment site. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 581–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Jokelainen, P.T. 1967. The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J. Ultras. Res. 19: 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Joseph, J., Liu, S.T., Jablonski, S.A., Yen, T.J., and Dasso, M. 2004. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr. Biol. 14: 611–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Joseph, J., Tan, S.H., Karpova, T.S., McNally, J.G., and Dasso, M. 2002. SUMO-1 targets RanGAP1 to kinetochores and mitotic spindles. J. Cell Biol. 156: 595–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Kallio, M.J., Beardmore, V.A., Weinstein, J., and Gorbsky, G.J. 2002. Rapid microtubule- independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 158: 841–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Kallio, M., Eriksson, J.E., and Gorbsky, G.J. 2000. Differences in spindle association of the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2 in mammalian spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 225: 112–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Kang, Y.H., Park, J.E., Yu, L.R., Soung, N.K., Yun, S.M., Bang, J.K., Seong, Y.S., Yu, H., Garfield, S., Veenstra, T.D., and Lee, K.S. 2006. Self-regulated Plk1 recruitment to kinetochores by the Plk1-PBIP1 interaction is critical for proper chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell 24: 409–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Kaplan, K.B., Hyman A.A., and Sorger, P.K. 1997. Regulating the yeast kinetochore by ubiquitin-dependent degradation and Skp1p-mediated phosphorylation. Cell 91:491–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Kaplan, K.B., Burds, A.A., Swedlow, J.R., Bekir, S.S., Sorger, P.K., and Nathke, I.S. 2001. A role for the adenomatous polyposis coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 429–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Kapoor, M., Montes de Oca Luna, R., Liu, G., Lozano, G., Cummings, C., Mancini, M., Ouspenski, I., Brinkley, B.R., and May, G.S. 1998. The cenpB gene is not essential in mice. Chromosoma 107: 570–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Katis, V.L., Galova, M., Rabitsch, K.P., Gregan, J., and Nasmyth, K. 2004. Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S332. Curr. Biol. 14: 560–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Kawashima, S.A., Tsukahara, T., Langegger, M., Hauf, S., Kitajima, T.S., and Watanabe, Y. 2007. Shugoshin enables tension-generating attachment of kinetochores by loading Aurora to centromeres. Genes Dev. 21: 420–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Keith, K.C., and Fitzgerald-Hayes, M. 2000. CSE4 genetically interacts with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere DNA elements CDE I and CDE II but not CDE III. Implications for the path of the centromere DNA around a Cse4p variant nucleosome. Genetics 156: 973–981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Kerrebrock, A.W., Miyazaki, W.Y., Birnby, D., and Orr-Weaver, T.L. 1992. The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics 130: 827–841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Kerres, A., Jakopec, V., and Fleig, U. 2007. The conserved Spc7 protein is required for spindle integrity and links kinetochore complexes in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 2441–2454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Kiburz, B.M., Reynolds, D.B., Megee P.C., Marston, A.L., Lee, B.H., Lee, T.I., Levine, S.S., Young R.A., and Amon, A. 2005. The core centromere and Sgo1 establish a 50-kb cohesin- protected domain around centromeres during meiosis I. Genes Dev. 19: 3017–3030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Kilmartin, J.V. 1994. Genetic and biochemical approaches to spindle function and chromosome segregation in eukaryotic microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6: 50–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. King, J.M., Hays, T.S., and Nicklas, R.B. 2000. Dynein is a transient kinetochore component whose binding is regulated by microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 151: 739-748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Kingwell, B., and Rattner, J.B. 1987. Mammalian kinetochore/centromere composition: a 50 kDa antigen is present in the mammalian kinetochore/centromere. Chromosoma 95: 403–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Kipling, D., and Warburton, P.E. 1997. Centromeres, CENP-B and Tigger too. Trends Genet. 13:141–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Kitajima, T.S., Yokobayashi, S., Yamamoto, M., and Watanabe, Y. 2003. Distinct cohesin complexes organize meiotic chromosome domains. Science 300: 1152–1155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Kitajima, T.S., Kawashima, S.A., and Watanabe, Y. 2004. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 427: 510–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Kitajima, T.S., Sakuno, T., Ishiguro, K., Iemura, S.,Natsume, T., Kawashima, S.A., and Watanabe, Y. 2006. Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature 441: 46–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Kitagawa, K., Skowyra, D., Elledge, S.J., Harper, J.W., and Hieter, P. 1999. SGT1 encodes an essential component of the yeast kinetochore assembly pathway and a novel subunit of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol. Cell 4: 21–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Kiyomitsu, T., Obuse, C., and Yanagida, M. 2007. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell: 13: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Klein, F., Mahr, P., Galova, M., Buonomo, S.B., Michaelis, C., Nairz, K., and Nasmyth, K. 1999. A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98: 91–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Kline, S.L., Cheeseman, I.M., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T., and Desai, A. 2006. The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 173: 9–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Kniola, B., O'Toole, E., McIntosh, J. R., Mellone, B., Allshire, R., Mengarelli, S., Hultenby, K., and Ekwall, K. 2001. The domain structure of centromeres is conserved from fission yeast to humans. Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 2767–2775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Koch, J. 2000. Neocentromeres and alpha satellite: a proposed structural code for functional human centromere DNA. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9: 149–154.Google Scholar
  137. Kopski, K.M., and Huffaker, T.C. 1997. Suppressors of the ndc10–2 mutation: a role for the ubiquitin system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore function. Genetics 147: 409–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Koshland, D., Kent, J.C., and Hartwell, L.H. 1985. Genetic analysis of the mitotic transmission of minichromosomes. Cell 40: 393–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Koshland, D.H., Rutledge, L., Fitzgerald-Hayes, M., and Hartwell, L.H. 1987. A genetic analysis of dicentric minichromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 48: 801–812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Kouprina, N., Kirillov, A., Kroll, E., Koryabin, M., Shestopalov, B., Bannikov, V., Zakharyev, V., and Larionov, V. 1993a. Identification and cloning of the CHL4 gene controlling chromosome segregation in yeast. Genetics 135: 327–341.Google Scholar
  141. Kouprina, N., Tsouladse, A., Koryabin, M., Hieter, P., Spencer, F., and Larionov, V. 1993b. Identification and mapping of CHL genes controlling mitotic chromosome transmission in yeast. Yeast 9: 11–19.Google Scholar
  142. Kroll, E.S., Hyland, K.M., Hieter, P., and Li, J.J. 1996. Establishing genetic interactions by a synthetic dosage lethality phenotype. Genetics 143: 95–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Kwon, M.S., Hori, T., Okada, M., and Fukagawa, T. 2007. CENP-C is involved in chromosome segregation, mitotic checkpoint function, and kinetochore assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 2155–2168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Le, M.H., Duricka, D., and Karpen, G.H. 1995. Islands of complex DNA are widespread in Drosophila centric heterochromatin. Genetics 141: 283–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Lechner, J. 1994. A zinc finger protein, essential for chromosome segregation, constitutes a putative DNA binding subunit of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore complex, Cbf3. The EMBO J. 13: 5203–5211.Google Scholar
  146. Lechner, J., and Carbon, J. 1991. A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell 64: 717–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Lee, Y.T., Jacob, J., Michowski, W., Nowotny, M., Kuznicki, J., and Chazin, W.J. 2004. Human Sgt1 binds HSP90 through the CHORD-Sgt1 domain and not the tetratricopeptide repeat domain. J Biol Chem. 279: 16511–16517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Lee, J., Miyano, T., Dai, Y., Wooding, P., Yen, T.J., and Moor, R.M. 2000. Specific regulation of CENP-E and kinetochores during meiosis I/meiosis II transition in pig oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56: 51–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Liao, H., Winkfein, R.J., Mack, G., Rattner, J.B., and Yen, T.J. 1995. CENP-F is a protein of the nuclear matrix that assembles onto kinetochores at late G2 and is rapidly degraded after mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 130: 507–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Lingelbach, L.B., and Kaplan, K.B. 2004. The interaction between Sgt1p and Skp1p is regulated by HSP90 chaperones and is required for proper CBF3 assembly. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 8938–8950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Liu, X., McLeod, I., Anderson, S., Yates, J.R. 3rd, and He, X. 2005. Molecular analysis of kinetochore architecture in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24: 2919–2930.Google Scholar
  152. Liu, S.T., Hittle, J.C., Jablonski, S.A., Campbell, M.S., Yoda, K., and Yen, T.J. 2003. Human CENP-I specifies localization of CENP-F, MAD1 and MAD2 to kinetochores and is essential for mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 341–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Liu, S.T., Rattner, J.B., Jablonski, S.A., and Yen, T.J. 2006. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 175: 41–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Lo, A.W., Craig, J.M., Saffery, R., Kalitsis, P., Irvine, D.V., Earle, E., Magliano, D.J., and Choo, K.H. 2001a. A 330 kb CENP-A binding domain and altered replication timing at a human neocentromere. EMBO J. 20: 2087–2096.Google Scholar
  155. Lo, A.W., Magliano, D.J., Sibson, M.C., Kalitsis, P., Craig, J.M., and Choo, K.H. 2001b. A novel chromatin immunoprecipitation and array (CIA) analysis identifies a 460-kb CENP-A- binding neocentromere DNA. Genome Res. 11: 448–457.Google Scholar
  156. Loïodice, I., Alves, A., Rabut, G., Van Overbeek, M., Ellenberg, J., Sibarita, J. B., and Doye, V. 2004. The entire Nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 3333–3344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Luger, K., Mader, A.W., Richmond, R.K., Sargent. D.F., and Richmond, T.J. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389: 251–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Lutzmann, M., Kunze, R., Buerer, A., Aebi, U., and Hurt, E. 2002. Modular self-assembly of a Y-shaped multiprotein complex from seven nucleoporins. EMBO J. 21: 387–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Ma, W., Hou, Y., Sun, Q-Y, Sun, X.-F., and Wang, W.-H. 2003. Localization of centromere proteins and their association with chromosomes and microtubules during meiotic maturation in pig oocytes. Reproduction 126: 731–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Maddox, P.S., Oegema, K., Desai, A., and Cheeseman, I.M. 2004. “Holo”er than thou: chromosome segregation and kinetochore function in C. elegans. Chromosome Res. 12: 641–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Maddox, P.S., Hyndman, F., Monen, J., Oegema, K., and Desai, A. 2007. Functional genomics identifies a Myb domain-containing protein family required for assembly of CENP-A chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 176: 757–763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Maiato, H., DeLuca. J., Salmon, E.D., and Earnshaw, W.C. 2004. The dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface. J. Cell Sci. 117: 5461–5477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Malik, H.S., and Henikoff, S. 2002. Conflict begets complexity: the evolution of centromeres. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12: 711–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Malik, H.S., Vermaak, D., and Henikoff, S. 2002. Recurrent evolution of DNA-binding motifs in the Drosophila centromeric histone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 1449–1454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Marahrens, Y., and Stillman, B. 1992. A yeast chromosomal origin of DNA replication defined by multiple functional elements. Science 255, 817–823.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Marston, A.L., Tham, W.H., Shah, H., and Amon, A. 2004. A genome-wide screen identifies genes required for centromeric cohesion. Science 303: 1367–1370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Masumoto, H., Masukata, H., Muro, Y., Nozaki, N., and Okazaki, T. 1989. A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J. Cell. Biol. 109: 1963–1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. McEwen, B.F., Arena, J.T., Frank, J., and Rieder, C.L. 1993. Structure of the colcemid treated PtK1 kinetochore outer plate as determined by high voltage electron microscopic tomography. J. Cell Biol. 120: 301–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. McEwen, B.F., Hsieh, C.E., Mattheyses, A.L., and Rieder, C.L. 1998. A new look at kinetochore structure in vertebrate somatic cells using high pressure freezing and freeze substitution. Chromosoma 107: 366–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. McGrew, J.T., Xiao, Z., and Fitzgerald-Hayes, M. 1989. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in chromosome segregation. Yeast 5: 271–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Measday, V., Baetz, K., Guzzo, J., Yuen, K., Kwok, T., Sheikh, B., Ding, H., Ueta, R., Hoac, T., Cheng, B., Pot, I., Tong, A., Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y., Boone, C., Hieter, P., and Andrews. B. 2005. Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for chromosome segregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102: 13956–13961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Measday, V., Hailey, D.W., Pot, I., Givan, S.A., Hyland, K.M., Cagney, G., Fields, S., Davis, T.N., and Hieter, P. 2002. Ctf3p, the Mis6 budding yeast homolog, interacts with Mcm22p and Mcm16p at the yeast outer kinetochore. Genes Dev. 16: 101–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Meeks-Wagner, D., Wood, J.S., Garvik, B., and Hartwell, L.H. 1986. Isolation of two genes that affect mitotic chromosome transmission in S. cerevisiae. Cell 44: 53–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Mellone, B.G., and Allshire, R.C. 2003. Stretching it: putting the CEN(P-A) in centromere. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13: 191–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Mellone, B., Erhardt, S., and Karpen, G.H. 2006. The ABCs of centromeres. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:427–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Mellor, J., Jiang, W., Funk, M., Rathjen, J., Barnes, C.A., Hinz, T., Hegemann, J.H., and Philippsen, P. 1990. CPF1, a yeast protein which functions in centromeres and promoters. EMBO J. 9: 4017–4026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Meluh, P.B., and Koshland, D. 1995. Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP- C. Mol. Biol. Cell 6: 793–807.Google Scholar
  178. Meluh, P.B., Yang, P., Glowczewski, L., Koshland, D., Smith, M.M. 1998. Cse4p is a component of the core centromere of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 94: 607–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V.M., Sorger, P.K. 2004. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7: 45–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Meraldi, P., McAinsh, A.D., Rheinbay, E., and Sorger, P.K. 2006. Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. Genome Biology 7: R23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Merry, D.W., Pathak, S., Hsu, T.C., and Brinkley, B.R. 1985. Anti-kinetochore antibodies: use as probes for inactive centromeres. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 37: 425–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Mikami, Y., Hori, T., Kimura, H., and Fukagawa, T. 2005. The functional region of CENP-H interacts with the Nuf2 complex that localizes to centromere during mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 1958–1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Minoshima, Y., Hori, T., Okada, M., Kimura, H., Haraguchi, T., Hiraoka, Y., Bao, Y.C., Kawashima, T., Kitamura, T., and Fukagawa, T. 2005. The constitutive centromere component CENP-50 is required for recovery from spindle damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 10315–10328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Miranda, J.J., De Wulf, P., Sorger, P.K., and Harrison, S.C. 2005. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12: 138–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Miranda, J.J., King, D.S., and Harrison, S.C. 2007. Protein arms in the kinetochore-microtubule interface of the yeast DASH complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18: 2503–2510. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Mizuguchi, G., Xiao, H., Wisniewski, J., Smith, M.M., and Wu, C. 2007. Nonhistone Scm3 and histones CenH3-H4 assemble the core of centromere-specific nucleosomes. Cell 129: 1153–1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Monje-Casas, F., Prabhu, V.R., Lee, B.H., Boselli, M., and Amon, A. 2007. Kinetochore orientation during meiosis is controlled by Aurora B and the monopolin complex. Cell 128: 477–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Monen, J., Maddox, P.S., Hyndman, F., Oegema, K., and Desai, A. 2005. Differential role of CENP-A in the segregation of holocentric C. elegans chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 7: 1248–1255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Moore, W., Zhang, C, and Clarke, P.R. 2002. Targeting of RCC1 to chromosomes is required for proper spindle assembly in human cells. Curr. Biol. 12: 1442–1447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Moroi, Y., Hartman, A.L., Nakane, P.K., and Tan, E.M. 1981. Distribution of kinetochore (centromere) antigen in mammalian cell nuclei. J. Cell Biol. 90: 254–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Moroi, Y., Peebles, C., Fritzler, M.J., Steigerwald, J., and Tan, E.M. 1980. Autoantibody to centromere (kinetochore) in scleroderma sera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77: 1627–1631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Murphy, T.D., and Karpen, G.H. 1995. Localization of centromere function in a Drosophila minichromosome. Cell 82: 599–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Mythreye, K., and Bloom, K.S. 2003. Differential kinetochore protein requirements for establishment versus propagation of centromere activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 160: 833–843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Nakagawa, H., Lee, J.K., Hurwitz, J., Allshire, R.C., Nakayama, J., Grewal, S.I., Tanaka, K., and Murakami, Y. 2002. Fission yeast CENP-B homologs nucleate centromeric heterochromatin by promoting heterochromatin-specific histone tail modifications. Genes Dev. 16: 1766–1778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Nasmyth, K. 2005. How might cohesin hold sister chromatids together? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360: 483–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Nasmyth, K., and Haering, C.H. 2005. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74: 595–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Nekrasov, V.S., Smith, M.A., Peak-Chew, S., and Kilmartin, J.V. 2003. Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 4931–4946.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Niikura, Y., Ohta, S., Vandenbeldt, K.J., Abdulle, R., McEwen, B.F., and Kitagawa, K. 2006. 17- AAG, an Hsp90 inhibitor, causes kinetochore defects: a novel mechanism by which 17-AAG inhibits cell proliferation. Oncogene 25: 4133–4146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Nishihashi, A., Haraguchi, T., Hiraoka, Y., Ikemura, T., Regnier, V., Dodson, H., Earnshaw, W.C., and Fukagawa, T. 2002. CENP-I is essential for centromere function in vertebrate cells. Dev. Cell 2: 463–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Nishino, M., Kurasawa, Y., Evans, R., Lin, S.H., Brinkley, B.R., Yu-Lee, L.Y. 2006. NudC is required for Plk1 targeting to the kinetochore and chromosome congression. Curr. Biol. 16: 1414–1421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Obuse, C., Iwasaki, O., Kiyomitsu, T., Goshima, G., Toyoda, Y., and Yanagida, M. 2004a. A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nature Cell Biol. 6: 1135–1141.Google Scholar
  202. Obuse, C., Yang, H., Nozaki, N., Goto, S., Okazaki, T., and Yoda, K. 2004b. Proteomics analysis of the centromere complex from HeLa interphase cells: UV-damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB-1) is a component of the CEN-complex, while BMI-1 is transiently co-localized with the centromeric region in interphase. Genes Cells 9: 105–120.Google Scholar
  203. Ochs, R.L., and Press, R.I. 1992. Centromere autoantigens are associated with the nucleolus. Exp. Cell Res. 200: 339–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Oegema, K., Desai, A., Rybina, S., Kirkham, M., and Hyman, A.A. 2001. Functional analysis of kinetochore assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell. Biol. 153: 1209–1226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Ohkura, H., Adachi, Y., Kinoshita, N., Niwa, O., Toda, T., and Yanagida, M. 1988. Cold- sensitive and caffeine-supersensitive mutants of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe dis genes implicated in sister chromatid separation during mitosis. EMBO J. 7: 1465–1473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Ohtsubo, M., Okazaki, H., and Nishimoto, T. 1989. The RCC1 protein, a regulator for the onset of chromosome condensation locates in the nucleus and binds to DNA. J. Cell Biol. 109: 1389–1397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Ohzeki, J., Nakano, M., Okada, T., and Masumoto, H. 2002. CENP-B box is required for de novo centromere chromatin assembly on human alphoid DNA. J. Cell Biol. 159: 765–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Okada, M., Cheeseman, I.M., Hori, T., Okawa, K., McLeod, I.X., Yates, J.R. III, Desai, A., and Fukagawa, T. 2006. The CENP-H-I complex is required for the efficient incorporation of newly synthesized CENP-A into centromeres. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 446–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Okada, T., Ohzeki, J., Nakano, M., Yoda, K., Brinkley, W.R., Larionov, V., and Masumoto, H. 2007. CENP-B controls centromere formation depending on the chromatin context. Cell 131: 1287–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Okamoto, Y., Nakano, M., Ohzeki, J., Larionov, V., and Masumoto, H. 2007. A minimal CENP- A core is required for nucleation and maintenance of a functional human centromere. EMBO J. 26: 1279–1291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Orjalo, A.V., Arnaoutov, A., Shen, Z., Boyarchuk, Y., Zeitlin, S.G., Fontoura, B., Briggs, B., Dasso, M., and Forbes, D.J. 2006. The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 3806–3818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Ortiz, J., Stemmann, O., Rank, S., and Lechner, J. 1999. A putative protein complex consisting of Ctf19, Mcm21, and Okp1 represents a missing link in the budding yeast kinetochore. Genes Dev. 13: 1140–1155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Palmer, D.K., O’Day K., Trong, H.L., Charbonneau, H., and Margolis, R.L. 1991. Purification of the centromere-specific protein CENP-A and demonstration that it is a distinctive histone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88: 3734–3738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Pasierbek, P., Jantsch, M., Melcher, M., Schleiffer, A., Schweizer, D., and Loidl, J. 2001. A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev. 15: 1349–1360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Perez-Castro, A.V., Shamanski, F.L., Meneses, J.J., Lovato, T.L., Vogel, K.G., Moyzis, R.K., and Pedersen, R. 1998. Centromeric Protein B null mice are viable with no apparent abnormalities. Dev. Biol. 201: 135–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Peterson, J. B., and Ris, H. 1976. Electron-microscopic study of the spindle and chromosome movement in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 22: 219–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Petronczki, M., Matos, J., Mori, S., Gregan, J., Bogdanova, A., Schwickart, M., Mechtler, K., Shirahige, K., Zachariae, W., and Nasmyth, K. 2006. Monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores at meiosis I requires casein kinase 1. Cell 126: 1049–1064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Pidoux, A.L., and Allshire, R.C. 2004. Kinetochore and heterochromatin domains of the fission yeast centromere. Chromosome Res. 12: 521–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Pietrasanta, L.I., Thrower, D., Hsieh, W., Rao, S., Stemmann, O., Lechner, J., Carbon, J., and Hansma, H. 1999. Probing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeric DNA (CEN DNA)- binding factor 3 (CBF3) kinetochore complex by using atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 3757–3762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Pimpinelli, S., and Goday, C. 1989. Unusual kinetochores and chromatin diminution in Parascaris. Trends Genet. 5: 310–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Pinsky, B.A., Kotwaliwale, C.V., Tatsutani, S.Y., Breed, C.A., and Biggins, S. 2006. Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunits can oppose the Ipl1/aurora protein kinase by redistributing Glc7. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 2648–2660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Pluta, A. F., Cooke, C. A., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1990. Structure of the human centromere at metaphase. Trends Biol. Sci. 15: 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Pluta, A.F., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1996. Specific interaction between human kinetochore protein CENP-C and a nucleolar transcriptional regulator. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 18767–18774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Pouwels, J., Kukkonen, A.M., Lan, W., Daum, J.R., Gorbsky, G.J., Stukenberg, T., and Kallio, M.J. 2007. Shugoshin 1 plays a central role in kinetochore assembly and is required for kinetochore targeting of Plk1. Cell Cycle 6: 1579–1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Prieto, I., Suja, J.A., Pezzi, N., Kremer, L., Martinez, A.C., Rufes, J.S., and Barbero, J.L. 2001. Mammalian STAG3 is a cohesin specific to sister chromatid arms in meiosis I. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 761–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Przewloka, M.R., Zhang, W., Costa, P., Archambault, V., D’Avino, P.P., Lilley, K.S., Laue, E.D., McAinsh, A.D., and Glover, D.M. 2007. Molecular analysis of core kinetochore composition and assembly in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 2: e478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Purvis, A., and Singleton, M.R. 2008. Insights into kinetochore-DNA interactions from the structure of Cep3Delta. EMBO Rep. 9: 56–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Rabitsch, K.P., Gregan, J., Schleiffer, A., Javerzat, J.P., Eisenhaber, F., and Nasmyth, K. 2004. Two fission yeast homologs of Drosophila Mei-S332 are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I and II. Curr. Biol. 14: 287–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  229. Rabitsch, K.P., Petronczki, M., Javerzat, J.P., Genier, S., Chwalla, B., Schleiffer, A., Tanaka, T.U., and Nasmyth. K. 2003. Kinetochore recruitment of two nucleolar proteins is required for homolog segregation in meiosis I. Dev. Cell 4: 535–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Rasala, B.A., Orjalo, A.V., Shen, Z., Briggs, S., and Forbes, D.J. 2006. ELYS is a dual nucleoporin/kinetochore protein required for nuclear pore assembly and proper cell division. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 17801–17806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Ray-Gallet, D., Quivy, J.P., Scamps, C., Martini, E.M., Lipinski, M., and Almouzni, G. 2002. HIRA is critical for a nucleosome assembly pathway independent of DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 9: 1091–1100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Resnick, T.D., Satinover, D.L., MacIsaac, F., Stukenberg, P.T., Earnshaw, W.C., Orr-Weaver, T.L., and Carmena, M. 2006. INCENP and Aurora B promote meiotic sister chromatid cohesion through localization of the Shugoshin MEI-S332 in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 11: 57 68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Regnier, V., Vagnarelli, P., Fukagawa, T., Zerjal, T., Burns, E., Trouche, D., Earnshaw, W., and Brown, W. 2005. CENP-A is required for accurate chromosome segregation and sustained kinetochore association of BubR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 3967–3981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Riedel, C.G., Katis, V.L., Katou, Y., Mori, S., Itoh, T., Helmhart, W., Galova, M., Petronczki, M., Gregan, J., Cetin, B., Mudrak, I., Ogris, E., Mechtler, K., Pelletier, L., Buchholz, F., Shirahige, K., and Nasmyth, K. 2006. Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature 441: 53–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Rieder, C.L., Alexander, S.P., and Rupp, G. 1990. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 110: 81–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Ris, H., and Witt, P.L. 1981. Structure of the mammalian kinetochore. Chromosoma 82: 153–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Roos, U.P. 1973. Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. II. Kinetochore structure and function. Chromosoma 41: 195–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Saitoh, H., Tomkiel, J.E., Cooke, C.A., Ratrie, H.R., Maurer, M., Rothfield, N.F., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1992. CENP-C, an autoantigen in scleroderma, is a component of the human inner kinetochore plate. Cell 70: 115–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Salina, D., Enarson, P., Rattner, J.B., and Burke, B. 2003. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 162: 991–1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Sandall, S., Severin, F., McLeod, I.X., Yates, J.R. 3rd, Oegema, K., Hyman, A., and Desai, A. 2006. A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 127: 1179–1191.Google Scholar
  241. Scharfenberger, M., Ortiz, J., Grau, N., Janke, C., Schiebel, E., and Lechner, J. 2003. Nsl1p is essential for the establishment of bipolarity and the localization of the Dam-Duo complex. EMBO J. 22: 6584–6597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. Schatten, G., Simerly, C., Palmer, D.K., Margolis, R.L., Maul, G., Andrews, B.S., and Schatten, H. 1988. Kinetochore appearance during meiosis, fertilization and mitosis in mouse oocytes and zygotes. Chromosoma 96: 341–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. Schuh, M., Lechner, C.F., and Heidmann, S. 2007. Incorporation of Drosophila CID/CENP-A and CENP-C into centromeres during early embryonic anaphase. Curr. Biol. 17: 237–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Schuyler, S.C., and Pellman, D. 2002. Analysis of the size and shape of protein subcomplexes from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 351: 150–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. Shah, J.V., Botvinick, E., Bonday, Z., Furnari, F., Berns, M., and Cleveland, D.W. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins: implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr. Biol. 14: 942–952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  246. Sharp, J.A., Franco, A.A., Osley, M.A., and Kaufman, P.D. 2002. Chromatin assembly factor I and Hir proteins contribute to building functional kinetochores in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 16: 85–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Shelby, R.D., Monier, K., and Sullivan, K.F. 2000. Chromatin assembly at kinetochores is uncoupled from DNA replication. J. Cell Biol. 151: 1113–1118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. Shelby, R.D., Vafa, O., and Sullivan, K.F. 1997. Assembly of CENP-A into centromeric chromatin requires a cooperative array of nucleosomal DNA contact sites. J. Cell Biol. 136: 501–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. Siniossoglou, S., Lutzmann, M., Santos-Rosa, H., Leonard, K., Mueller, S., Aebi, U., and Hurt, E. 2000. Structure and assembly of the Nup84p complex. J. Cell Biol. 149: 41–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. Siniossoglou, S., Wimmer, C., Rieger, M., Doye, V., Tekotte, H., Weise, C., Emig, S., Segref, A., and Hurt, E.C. 1996. A novel complex of nucleoporins, which includes Sec13p and a Sec13p homolog, is essential for normal nuclear pores. Cell 84: 265–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. Smith, M.M., Yang, P., Santisteban, M.S., Boone, P.W., Goldstein, A.T., and Megee, P.C. 1996. A novel histone H4 mutant defective in nuclear division and mitotic chromosome transmission. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 1017–1026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  252. Spencer, F., Gerring, S.L., Connelly, C., and Hieter P. 1990. Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124: 237–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  253. Steensgaard, P., Garre, M., Muradore, I., Transidico, P., Nigg, E.A., Kitagawa, K., Earnshaw, W.C., Faretta, M., and Musacchio, A. 2004. Sgt1 is required for human kinetochore assembly. EMBO Rep. 5: 626–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Stemmann, O., Neidig, A., Kocher, T., Wilm, M., and Lechner, J. 2002. Hsp90 enables Ctf13p/Skp1p to nucleate the budding yeast kinetochore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 8585–8590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. Steuer, E.R., Wordeman, L., Schroer, T.A., and Sheetz, M.P. 1990. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature 345: 266–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. Stoler S., Keith, K.C., Curnick, K.E., and Fitzgerald-Hayes, M.A. 1995. Mutation in CSE4, an essential gene encoding a novel chromatin-associated protein in yeast, causes chromosome nondisjunction and cell cycle arrest at mitosis. Genes Dev. 9: 573–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. Stoler, S., Rogers, K., Weitze, S., Morey, L., Fitzgerald-Hayes, M., and Baker, R.E. 2007. Scm3, an essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere protein required for G2/M progression and Cse4 localization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 10571–10576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. Strunnikov, A.V., Kingsbury, J., and Koshland, D. 1995. CEP3 encodes a centromere protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 128: 749–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. Sugata, N., Munekata, E., and Todokoro, K. 1999. Characterization of a novel kinetochore protein, CENP-H. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 27343–27346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. Sun, X., Le, H.D., Wahlstrom, J.M., and Karpen, G.H. 2003. Sequence analysis of a functional Drosophila centromere. Genome Res. 13: 182–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Sun, X., Wahlstrom, J., and Karpen, G. 1997. Molecular structure of a functional Drosophila centromere. Cell 91: 1007–1019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. Tagami, H., Ray-Gallet, D., Almouzni, G., and Nakatani, Y. 2004. Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 116: 51–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Takahashi, K., Chen, E.S., and Yanagida, M. 2000. Requirement of Mis6 centromere connector for localizing a CENP-A-like protein in fission yeast. Science 288: 2215–2219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. Takahashi, K., Takayama, Y., Masuda, F., Kobayashi, Y., and Saitoh, S. 2005. Two distinct pathways responsible for the loading of CENP-A to centromeres in the fission yeast cell cycle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360: 595–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. Takahashi, K., Yamada, H., and Yanagida, M. 1994. Fission yeast minichromosome loss mutants mis cause lethal aneuploidy and replication abnormality. Mol. Biol. Cell 5: 1145–1158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  266. Tanaka, K., Mukae, N., Dewar, H., van Breugel, M., James, E.K., Prescott, A.R., Antony, C., and Tanaka, T.U. 2005. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434: 987–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Tang, Z., Shu, H., Qi, W., Mahmood, N.A., Mumby, M.C., and Yu, H. 2006. PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation. Dev. Cell 10: 575–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. Teixeira, M. T., Siniossoglou, S., Podtelejnikov, S., Benichou, J. C., Mann, M., Dujon, B., Hurt, E., and Fabre, E. 1997. Two functionally distinct domains generated by in vivo cleavage of Nup145p: a novel biogenesis pathway for nucleoporins. EMBO J. 16: 5086–5097.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. Tirnauer, J.S., Canman, J.C., Salmon, E.D., and Mitchison, T.J. 2002. EB1 targets to kinetochores with attached, polymerizing microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 13: 4308–4316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. Toda, T., Umesono, K., Hirata, A., and Yanagida, M. 1983. Cold-sensitive nuclear division arrest mutants of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Mol. Biol. 168: 251–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  271. Tomkiel, J.E., Cooke, C.A., Saitoh, H., Bernat, R.L., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1994. CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 125: 531–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  272. Valdivia, M.M., and Brinkley, B.R. 1985. Fractionation and initial characterization of the kinetochore from mammalian metaphase chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 101: 1124–1134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. Van Hooser, A.A., Ouspenski, I.I., Gregson, H.C., Starr, D.A., Yen, T.J., Goldberg, M.L., Yokomori, K., Earnshaw, W.C., Sullivan, K.F., and Brinkley, B.R. 2001. Specification of kinetochore-forming chromatin by the histone H3 variant CENP-A. J. Cell Sci. 114: 3529–3542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  274. Vanoosthuyse, V., Prykhozhij, S., and Hardwick, K.G. 2007. Shugoshin 2 regulates localization of the chromosomal passenger proteins in fission yeast mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 1657–1669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. Vaur, S., Cubizolles, F., Plane, G., Genier, S., Rabitsch, P.K., Gregan, J., Nasmyth, K., Vanoosthuyse, V., Hardwick, K.G., and Javerzat, J.P. 2005. Control of Shugoshin function during fission-yeast meiosis. Curr. Biol. 15: 2263–2270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  276. Verreault, A., Kaufman, P.D., Kobayashi, R., and Stillman, B. 1996. Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 87: 95–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  277. Villasante, A., Abad, J.P., and Méndez-Lago, M. 2007. Centromeres were derived from telomeres during the evolution of the eukaryotic chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 10542–10547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. Warburton, P.E., Cooke, C.A., Bourassa, S., Vafa, O., Sullivan, B.A., Stetten, G., Gimelli, G., Warburton, D., Tyler-Smith, C., Sullivan, K.F., Poirier, G.G., and Earnshaw, W.C. 1997. Immunolocalization of CENP-A suggests a distinct nucleosome structure at the inner kinetochore plate of active centromeres. Curr. Biol. 7: 901–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  279. Watanabe, Y., and Nurse, P. 1999. Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature 400: 461–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  280. Wei, R.R., Sorger, P.K., and Harrison, S.C. 2005. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102: 5363–5367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  281. Wei, R.R., Al-Bassam, J., and Harrison, S.C. 2007. The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14: 54–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  282. Weiner, E.S., Hildebrandt, S., Senecal, J.-L., Daniels, L., Noell, S., Joyal, F., Roussin, A., Earnshaw, W., and Rothfield, N.F. 1991. Prognostic significance of anticentromere antibodies and anti-topoisomerase I antibodies in Raynaud's disease: A prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 34: 68–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  283. Westermann, S., Cheeseman, I.M., Anderson, S., Yates, J.R. III, Drubin, D.G., and Barnes, G. 2003. Architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore reveals a conserved molecular core. J. Cell Biol. 163: 215–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  284. Westermann, S., Avila-Sakar, A., Wang, H.W., Niederstrasser, H., Wong, J., Drubin, D.G., Nogales, E., and Barnes, G. 2005. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell 17: 277–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  285. Westermann, S., Drubin, D.G., and Barnes, G. 2007. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76: 563–591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  286. Wigge, P.A., and Kilmartin, J.V. 2001. The Ndc80p complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains conserved centromere components and has a function in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol., 152: 349–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  287. Winey, M., Mamay, C. L., O'Toole, E. T., Mastronarde, D. N., Giddings, T. H., Jr., McDonald, K. L., and McIntosh, J. R. 1995. Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 129: 1601–1615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. Winkler, A.A., Korstanje, R., Zonneveld, B.J., Hooykaas, P.J., and Steensma, H.Y. 2000. Isolation and characterization of KIUBP2, a ubiquitin hydrolase gene of Kluyveromyces lactis that can suppress a ts-mutation in CBF2, a gene encoding a centromeric protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 38: 17–22.Google Scholar
  289. Wojcik, E., Basto, R., Serr, M., Scaerou, F., Karess, R., and Hays, T. 2001. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 1001–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  290. Wong, J., Nakajima, Y., Westermann, S., Shang, C., Kang, J.S., Goodner, C., Houshmand, P., Fields, S., Chan, C.S., Drubin, D., Barnes, G., and Hazbun, T. 2007. A protein interaction map of the mitotic spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 3800–3809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. Xu, H., Beasley, M.D., Warren, W. D., van der Horst, G.T., and McKay, M.J. 2005. Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev. Cell 8: 949–961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  292. Yao, X., Anderson, K.L., and Cleveland, D.W. 1997. The microtubule-dependent motor centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E) is an integral component of kinetochore corona fibers that link centromeres to spindle microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 139: 435–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  293. Yoda, K., Ando, S., Morishita S., Houmura, S., Hashimoto, K., Takeyassu, K, and Okazaki T. 2000. Human Centromere Protein A (CENP-A) can replace histone H3 in nucleosome reconstitution in Vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 97: 7266–7271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  294. Yokobayashi, S., and Watanabe, Y. 2005. The kinetochore protein Moa1 enables cohesion- mediated monopolar attachment at meiosis I. Cell 123: 803–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  295. Yoon, H.J., and Carbon, J. 1999. Participation of Bir1p, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family, in yeast chromosome segregation events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 13208–13213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  296. Zinkowski, R.P., Meyne, J., and Brinkley, B.R. 1991. The centromere-kinetochore complex: a repeat subunit model. J. Cell Biol. 113: 1091–1110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  297. Zuccolo, M., Alves, A., Galy, V., Bolhy, S., Formstecher, E., Racine, V., Sibarita, J.B., Fukagawa, T., Shiekhattar, R., Yen, T., and Doye, V. 2007. The human Nup107–160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J. 26: 1853–1864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental OncologyEuropean Institute of OncologyItaly

Personalised recommendations