Advertisement

The Oregon Forest Practices Act and Forest Research

  • Anne B. Hairston-Strang
  • Paul W. Adams
  • George G. Ice
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 199)

Keywords

Woody Debris Forest Research Forest Industry Large Woody Debris Forest Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adams, D.M., Schillinger, R., Latta, G., and Van Nalts, A. 2002. Timber harvest projections for private land in western Oregon. Research Contribution 37. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 44pp.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, P.W. 1996. Oregon's Forest Practice Rules. Extension Circular 1194. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, OR. 11pp.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, P.W. 2007. Policy and management for headwater streams in the Pacific Northwest: Synthesis and reflection. Forest Science. 53(2):104–118.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, P.W., and Hairston, A.B. 1994. Using scientific input in policy and decision making. Extension Circular 1441. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, OR. 19pp.Google Scholar
  5. Adams, P.W., and Hairston, A.B. 1996. Calling all experts: Using science to direct policy. J. of For. 94(4):27–30.Google Scholar
  6. Andrus, C.W., and Lorensen, T. 1992. Water classification and protection project. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  7. Beschta, R.L., Boyle, J.R., Chambers, C.C., Gibson, W.P., and coauthors. 1995. Cumulative effects of forest practices in Oregon: literature and synthesis. Prepared for Oregon Dept. of Forestry. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  8. Botkin, D., Cummins, K., Dunne, T., Reiger, H., and coauthors. 1995. Status and future of salmon of western Oregon and northern California. The Center for the Study of the Environment, Santa Barbara, CA. 300pp.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, G.W., Carlson, D., Carter, G., Heckeroth, D., and coauthors. 1978. Meeting water quality objectives on state and private forest lands through the Oregon Forest Practices Act. Report prepared for the State Forester. Oregon State Dept. of Forestry.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, G.W., Gahler, A.R., and Marston, R.B. 1973. Nutrient losses after clear-cut logging and slash burning in the Oregon Coast Range. Water Resour. Res. 9:1450–1453.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, G.W., and Krygier, J.T. 1970. Effects of clear-cutting on stream temperature. Water Resour. Res. 6:1133–1139.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, G.W., and Krygier, J.T. 1971. Clearcut logging and sediment production in the Oregon Coast Range. Water Resour. Res. 7:1189–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buck, S.J. 1991. Understanding Environmental Administration and Law. Island Press, Washington, DC. 216pp.Google Scholar
  14. Carleson, D., and Wilson, L.W. 1985. Report of the riparian habitat task force. Oregon Dept. of Forestry and Dept of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, L.S., Ruth, L.W., Teeguarden, D.E., and Henly, R.K. 1991. Ballot box forestry. J. For. 89(12):10–18.Google Scholar
  16. Dent, L., Robison, G., Mills, K., Skaugset, A., and coauthors. 1997. Oregon Department of Forestry 1996 storm impacts monitoring project –Preliminary report. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR. 53pp.Google Scholar
  17. Fredriksen, R.L. 1971. Comparative chemical water quality –natural and disturbed streams following logging and slash burning, pp. 125–137. In: J.T. Krygier and J.D. Hall, editors. Proceedings of a symposium: Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  18. Froehlich, H.A. 1971. Logging debris: managing a problem, pp.112–117. In: J.T. Krygier and J.D. Hall, editors. Proceedings of a symposium: Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  19. Haas, J.B. 1971. Letter to State Representative William E. Markham from staff of Fish Commission of Oregon.Google Scholar
  20. Hairston-Strang, A.B., and Adams, P.W. 1997. Oregon's streamside rules: achieving public goals on private land. J. For. 95(7):14–18.Google Scholar
  21. Hairston-Strang, A.B., and Adams, P.W. 1998. Potential large woody debris sources in riparian buffers after harvesting in Oregon, U.S.A. Forest Ecol. and Manage. 112:67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, J.D. 1971. Contributions of the Federal Water Quality Administration to the Alsea Watershed Study, pp. 245. In: J.T. Krygier and J.D. Hall editors. Proceedings of a symposium: Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, J.D., Brown, G.W., and Lantz, R.L. 1987. The Alsea Watershed Study: a retrospective, pp. 399–416. In: E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy, editors. Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions. Univ. of Washington Inst. of Forest Resour., Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, J.D., and Lantz, R.L. 1969. Effects of logging on the habitat of coho salmon and cutthroat trout in coastal streams, pp. 355–375. In: T.G. Northcote, editor. Symposium on Salmon and Trout in Streams. Univ. of British Columbia, H.R. MacMillan Lectures in Fisheries, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, D.D. 1977. Hydrologic changes after logging in two small Oregon coastal watersheds. Water-Supply Paper 2037. U.S. Geological Survey Washington, DC. 31pp.Google Scholar
  26. Ice, G.G. 1991. Significance of the Alsea watershed studies to development of forest practice rules, pp. 22–28. In: The New Alsea Watershed Study. Technical Bull. 602. Natl. Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Ice, G.G., Beschta, R.L., Craig, R.S., and Sedell, J.R. 1989. Riparian protection rules for Oregon forests, pp. 533–536. In: Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference. General Technical Report PSW-110. USDA Forest Service, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Ice, G.G., Skaugset, A., and Simmons, A. 2006. Estimating areas and timber values of riparian management zones on forest lands. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 42:115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krygier, J.T., and Hall, J.D. 1971. Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment, Proceedings of a Symposium, October 19–21, 1970. Oregon State University Continuing Education Publications, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  30. Lantz, R.L. 1971. Guidelines for Stream Protection in Logging Operations. Oregon State Game Comm., Portland, OR. 29pp.Google Scholar
  31. Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., Johnson, N.M., Fisher, D.W., and coauthors. 1970. Effects of forest cutting and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in the Hubbard Brook watershed ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 40:23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lorensen, T., Andrus, C., Mills, K., Runyon, J., and coauthors. 1993. Report on the analysis of proposed water classification and protection rules. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  33. Lorensen, T., Andrus, C., and Runyon, J. 1994. Oregon Forest Practices Act water protection rules: scientific and policy considerations. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR. 38pp.Google Scholar
  34. Lorensen, T., and Birch, K. 1994. Economic analysis of proposed water classification and protection rules (13 December 1993 draft rule proposal). Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  35. McLennan, J. 1992. The Endangered Species Act and aquatic natural resources: perspectives for the future. J. Amer. Fisheries Soc. Symp. on the Endangered Species Act, Rapid City, SD.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, R.D., Apittlehouse, D.L., and Story, A. 2005. Small stream channels and their riparian zones in forested catchments in the Pacific Northwest. Special Issue. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc 41:813–834.Google Scholar
  37. Moring, J.R. 1975. The Alsea Watershed Study: effects of logging on the aquatic resources of three headwater streams of the Alsea River, Oregon. Part II. Changes in environmental conditions. Fish. Res. Rep. 9. Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis, OR. 39pp.Google Scholar
  38. Morman, D. 1993. Riparian rule effectiveness study report. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR. 198pp.Google Scholar
  39. Narver, D.W. 1971. Effects of logging debris on fish production, pp. 100–111. In: J.T. Krygier and J.D. Hall, editors. Proceedings of a symposium: Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  40. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1998a. A draft proposal concerning Oregon forest practices –Submitted by the National Marine Fisheries Service to the Oregon Board of Forestry Memorandum of Agreement Advisory Committee and the Office of the Governor, Portland, OR. 154pp.Google Scholar
  41. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1998b. Forest practice science discussion groups – Review materials, notes, evaluations and comments. Vols. I and II. Compiled by Oregon Branch, Habitat Conservation Division, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  42. Norris, L.A., and Moore, D.G. 1971. The entry and fate of forest chemicals in streams, pp. 45–67. In: J.T. Krygier and J.D. Hall editors. Proceedings of a symposium: Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  43. Olsen, E.D., Keough, D.S., and LaCourse, D.K. 1987. Economic impact of proposed Oregon Forest Practice Rules on industrial forest lands in the Oregon Coast Range: a case study. Res. Bull. 61. Forest Research Lab, College of Forestry. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 15pp.Google Scholar
  44. Oregon Dept. of Forestry. 1968. Conservation act said out of step with times. Forest Log 38(2):1–4.Google Scholar
  45. Oregon Dept. of Forestry. 1977a. Gnat Creek: We still don't know what caused the fish-kill. Forest Log 47:2–4.Google Scholar
  46. Oregon Dept. of Forestry. 1977b. Minutes of meeting, 8 June 1977. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  47. Oregon Dept. of Forestry. 1991. Final report on Oregon forest practices public forum issues. Forest Log 60:4–70.Google Scholar
  48. Oregon Dept. of Forestry. 1993. Water classification. Tech. Note FP1. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR. 14pp.Google Scholar
  49. Oregon Dept. of Forestry. 1994. Forest practice water protection rules – Divisions 24 and 57. Effective September 1, 1994. Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  50. Pacific Northwest Loggers Association. 1937. Joint committee on forest conservation. Forest Practice Handbook: Presenting the Rules of Forest Practice for the Douglas Fir Region. PNW Loggers Assn., Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  51. Puget Sound Water Quality Authority. 1986. Issue Paper: Nonpoint source pollution. PSWQA, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  52. Pyles, M.R., Adams, P.W., Beschta, R.L., and Skaugset, A.E. 1998. Forest practices and landslides – A report prepared for Governor John A. Kitzhaber. Forest Engineering Dept., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  53. Pyles, M.R., and Froehlich, H.A. 1987. Discussion of “Rates of landsliding as impacted by timber management activities in northwestern California,” by M. Wolfe and J. Williams. Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 24(3):425–431.Google Scholar
  54. Rey, M. 1980. The effect of the Clean Water Act on forestry practices, pp. 11–30. In: Symposium on U.S. Forestry and Water Quality: What Course in the ‘80s. Water Pollution Control Federation, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
  55. Schroeder, J.E. 1971. Programs and policies – Oregon Department of Forestry, pp. 215–218. In: J.T. Krygier and J.D. Hall, editors. Proceedings of a symposium: Forest Land Uses and Stream Environment. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  56. State of Oregon. 1996a. The governor’s coastal salmon restoration initiative, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  57. State of Oregon. 1996b. Peer review 1996—coastal salmon restoration initiative, Salem, OR.Google Scholar
  58. U.S. Forest Service. 1980. An approach to water resource evaluation of nonpoint silviculture sources (A procedural handbook). EPA-600/8-80-012. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  59. Wagner, S.L., Witt, J.M., Norris, L.A., Higgins, J.E., and coauthors. 1979. A scientific critique of the EPA Alsea II study and report. Oregon State Univ., Environmental Health Sciences Center, Corvallis, OR. 92pp.Google Scholar
  60. Watershed Research Cooperative (WRC). 2006. Watershed Research Cooperative 2004–2005 Annual Report. Oregon State Univ., Forest Engineering Department, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne B. Hairston-Strang
    • 1
  • Paul W. Adams
  • George G. Ice
  1. 1.Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesAnnapolis

Personalised recommendations