Development of a Regional System for Surgical Emergencies (RSSE)
In the United States, in the first decade of the twenty-first century, a 60-year-old man run over by a truck may have better access to life-saving care than a man with a perforated viscus or a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The reason is that many states and counties now have regional systems to coordinate the care of injured patients, but the concept of a geographic plan for non-traumatic, but devastating, surgical emergencies is new. The trauma system model is appropriate for these other surgical emergencies and possibly for certain medical emergencies as well, such as stroke and acute myocardial infarction. The concept of trauma system development is based on the principle that the system adds value over and above the efforts of individual practitioners or hospitals.1, 2, 3
KeywordsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm Acute Care Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Audit Committee Acute Care Hospital
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.Trauma System: Agenda for the Future; American Trauma Society, 2002. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/ems/emstraumasystem03.Google Scholar
- 10.Eastman B, et al. The Model Trauma Care System Plan. Washington, DC: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration, 1992.Google Scholar
- 20.Veteraris Administration National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, www.acsnsqip.org/main/about_features.asp.Google Scholar
- 22.ACS Trauma System Consultation Program; http://www.FACS.org/trauma/systems.pdf.Google Scholar