Fiducial Marker and Hybrid Alignment Methods for Single- and Double-axis Tomography

  • David N. Mastronarde


Accurate alignment of projection images is an important step in obtaining a high-quality tomographic reconstruction. Ideally, all images should be aligned so that each represents a projection of the same 3D object at a known projection angle. Inadequate image alignment will result in blurring or smearing of features in the reconstruction. The problem is made more difficult because exposure to the electron beam during the acquisition of a tilt series induces geometric changes in many samples (primarily plastic-embedded material). For any sample, but particularly for ones that are not rigid during imaging, a powerful method of image alignment uses the measured coordinates of fiducial markers through the series of images; these can be fit to equations that describe the image projection. Alternative methods are based on cross-correlation of images. The fiducial marker method has the advantage that it guarantees a consistent alignment among the images from the full range of tilt angles. It is also more easily adapted to correct for changes in the sample that occur during imaging.


Tilt Angle Gold Particle Local Alignment Projection Image Fiducial Marker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berriman, J., Bryan, R. K., Freeman, R. and Leonard, K. R. (1984). Methods for specimen thickness determination in electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 13:351–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandt, S., Heikkonen, J. and Engelhardt, P. (2001a). Automatic alignment of transmission electron microscope tilt series without fiducial markers. J. Struct. Biol. 136:201–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt, S., Heikkonen, J. and Engelhardt, P. (2001b). Multiphase method for automatic alignment of transmission electron microscope images using markers. J. Struct. Biol. 133:10–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fung, J.C., Liu, W., de Ruijter, W. J., Chen, H., Abbey, C. K., Sedat, J.W. and Agard, D.A. (1996). Toward fully automated high-resolution electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 116: 181–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frank, J. and McEwen, B. F. (1992). Alignment by cross-correlation. In Electron Tomography (J. Frank, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 205–213.Google Scholar
  6. Gilbert, P. (1972). Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. J. Theor. Biol. 36:105–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guckenberger, R. (1982). Determination of a common origin in the micrographs of tilt series in three-dimensional microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 9:167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gordon, R. and Herman, G. T. (1971). Reconstruction of pictures from their projections. Commun. ACM 14:759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jing, Z. and Sachs, F. (1991). Alignment of tomographic projection using an incomplete set of fiducial markers. Ultramicroscopy 35:37–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koval, J. J. (1997). Variable metric function minimization. Appl. Stat. 46:515–540.Google Scholar
  11. Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. and McIntosh, J. R. (1996). Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116:71–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawrence, M.C. (1992). Least-squares method of alignment using markers. In Electron Tomography (J. Frank, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 197–204.Google Scholar
  13. Marsh, B. J., Mastronarde, D.N., Buttle, K. F., Howell, K. E. and McIntosh, J. R. (2001). Organellar relationships in the Golgi region of the pancreatic beta cell line, HIT-T15, visualized by high resolution electron tomography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98:2399–2406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mastronarde, D. N. (1997). Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. J. Struct. Biol. 120:343–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Owen, C. H. and Landis, W. J. (1996). Alignment of electron tomographic series by correlation without the use of gold particles. Ultramicroscopy 63:27–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Penczek, P., Marko, M., Buttle, K. and Frank, J. (1995). Double-tilt electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 60:393–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Radermacher, M. (1992). Weighted back-projection methods. In Electron Tomography (J. Frank, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
  18. Ress, D., Harlow, M. L., Schwarz, M., Marshall, R. M. and McMahan, U. J. (1999). Automatic acquisition of fiducial markers and alignment of images in tilt series for electron tomography. J Electron Microsc. (Tokyo) 48:277–287.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, K. A., Tang, J., Cheng, Y. and Winkler, H. (1997). The use of electron tomography for structural analysis of disordered protein arrays. J. Struct. Biol. 120:372–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Winkler, H. and Taylor, K.A. (2006). Accurate marker-free alignment with simultaneous geometry determination and reconstruction of tilt series in electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 106:240–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David N. Mastronarde
    • 1
  1. 1.The Boulder Laboratory for 3D Electron Microscopy of Cells, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental BiologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations