Skip to main content

Redesigning the State, Reorienting State Power, and Rethinking the State

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

After a relatively fallow period in the 1990s, the general form and functions of states are once again returning to the top of the agenda, both theoretically and practically. This is particularly evident in the wake of the world economic crisis that became increasingly visible from mid-2007 onwards and has since triggered a radical restructuring of the state system and a profound strategic reorientation of state intervention. Indeed, following many predictions about the end of the national state, the close of 2008 and start of 2009 could be seen to herald its resurgence as the saviour in the last resort of an economic and social formation in crisis. Such changes are reawakening interest in the state apparatus, state capacities, state failure, and new forms of governance. Interest in the state and state power had declined following the end of the Cold War, the rise (or, at least, increasing recognition) of globalization processes and their effects, and the growing importance of new social movements. These three trends (and others in the same period) saw attention turn away, respectively, from the contrast between capitalism and socialism and their respective state forms to interest in varieties of capitalism and political regimes, from the national state and/or nation-state to global-local dialectics and multi-level governance, and from class struggle and the class character of the state to the dynamics of discourse and identity politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I refer here mainly to theory and practice in the North or West as opposed to social and political formations in the global south or the Eastern bloc. It would require too much space and take us beyond mainstream theories to address analyses of the state outside this context.

  2. 2.

    On the distinction between the national state and nation state, see Jessop (2002).

  3. 3.

    Cf. Willke (1992) on the polycontextural nature of the state and Taylor (1994) on the state as a ‘container’ of different social contents.

  4. 4.

    Collibration involves efforts to adjust the relative importance of different modes of governance (cf. Dunsire 1996).

  5. 5.

    The relativization of scale refers to the loss of primacy of the national scale of economic, political, welfare and civic organization that characterized post-WWII territorial states and the failure to establish another scale as primary — leading to competition among states for dominant and nodal positions in the scalar division of economic and political division of labour.

  6. 6.

    I use this metaphor to refer to advanced capitalist societies in the northern hemisphere plus their equivalents in the southern hemisphere (e.g., Australia, New Zealand). South refers to the Third World or Global South.

  7. 7.

    Some scholars deny that an East Asian economic miracle occurred, arguing that the high growth rates were simply factor-driven (e.g., Krugman 1994).

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991) The Imagined Community, London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1977) Lineages of the Absolutist State, London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, P. (2000) The Imported State: the Westernization of the Political Order, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1966) The Development of Public Services in Western Europe 1660–1930, Hamden, CT: Archon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bayart, P., Ellis, S., and Hibou, B., eds, (1999) The Criminalization of the State in Africa Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1987) ‘The World and the United States in 2013’, Daedalus, 166 (3) 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W. (2001). Rogue State—A Guide to the World's only Superpower, London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt, P. (2002) The Shield of Achilles, War, Peace and the Course of History, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Restructuring and State Rescaling in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cumings, B. (1999) ‘Webs with no spiders, spiders with no webs. The genealogy of the developmental states’, in M. Woo-Cumings, ed. (1999) The Developmental State, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.J. (2007) The East Asian Development Experience. The Miracle, the Crisis and the Future, London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibber, V. (2003) Locked in Place. State-building and Late Industrialization in India, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2001). Rogue States: the Rule of Force in World Affairs, London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessen, H.J.M. and Skalnik, P., eds (1978) Early State Formation, Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K.W. (1963) The Nerves of Government. Models of Political Communication and Control, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A. (1996) ‘Tipping the balance: autopoiesis and governance, Administration & Society, 28 (3), 299–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G.S., Meyer, J.W., and Hwang, H., eds (2006) Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (1963) The Political System of Empires, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1982) The Civilizing Process, vol 2. Power and Civility, New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1975) The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, in Marx-Engels Collected Works vol. 26, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 129–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics against Markets, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P.B. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger, H. (2008) Impersonal Power. History and Theory of the Bourgeois State, Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P.S. (2001) ‘Beyond Marx and Hintze? Third wave theories of early modern state formation’, Comparative Studies in History and Society, 43 (4), 851–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A., ed. (1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, M. (2000) Governmentality and the Mastery of Territory in nineteenth-century America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (1995) Re-stating Social and Political Change, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, O. (1975) The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R.H. (1980) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2007) State Power: a Strategic-Relational Approach, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Fairclough, F., and Wodak, R., eds (2008) Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D.C. (2002) Crony Capitalism. Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1994) ‘Competitiveness: a dangerous obsession’, Foreign Affairs, 73 (2), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. (2004) State-Directed Development. Political and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, M. (1985) Die Kritik der Staatsfinanzen: Zur politischen Ökonomie des Steuerstaats, Hamburg: VSA Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986) The Social Origins of Power, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1978) The Class Struggles in France, in Marx-Engels Collected Works, volume 10, London: Lawrence & Wishart, 47–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, D. (1998) The Network Society, London: Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. et al. (1997) ‘World society and the nation-state’, American Journal of Sociology, 103 (1), 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T.C. (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S.W. (1957) The Critique of Capitalist Democracy, New York: Paine Whitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B.R. (2006) The Making of the Modern State. A Theoretical Evolution, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1975) Strukturprobleme des kapitalischen Staates, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1995) The End of the Nation State: the Rise of Regional Economies, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D.E. (2004) Re-scaling IPE: Subnational States and the Regulation of Global Political Economy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, B. (1990) War and the Rise of the State, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1978) State, Power, Socialism, London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1999) State Formation, Nation-Building and Mass Politics in Europe: the Theory of Stein Rokkan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (2000) A Theory of the Global State. Globality as an Unfinished Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, H. (1993) The Sovereign State and its Competitors: an Analysis of Systems Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.M. (2004) A New World Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.J. (1994) ‘The state as container: territoriality in the modern world system’, Progress in Human Geography, 18 (3), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.J. (2004) World City Network. A Global Urban Analysis, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (2003) The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.E. (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates and Sovereigns. State-building and Extraterritorial Violence in early Modern Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., ed., (1973) The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1992) Coercion, Capital and European States AD 990–1990, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldner, D. (1999) State Building and Late Development, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1948) Essays from Max Weber, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. and Hobson, J. (1995) States and Economic Development: a Comparative Historical Analysis, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (1992) Die Ironie des Staates, Frankfurt, Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E.R. (1982) Europe and the People without History, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, J.-E. (1991) Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cumings, M., ed. (1999) The Developmental State, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J. and Pochet, P., eds (2005) The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: the European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategy, Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jessop, B. (2010). Redesigning the State, Reorienting State Power, and Rethinking the State. In: Leicht, K.T., Jenkins, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Politics. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics