Skip to main content

Elections and Voting

  • Chapter
Handbook of Politics

There are more democracies in the world now than ever before. Elections and voting are the lynchpins of new and established democracies alike. The object of this chapter is to examine the recent developments within studies of elections and voting. This general topic is far too vast for any single chapter or set of authors to survey comprehensively; instead we focus on the developments centered around two of the most central aspects of elections: Who votes and why? Who do those voters vote for and why? We also examine one of the most interesting new developments in election studies in recent years, political polarization, especially as it pertains to our central concerns with turnout and vote choice. While much of our attention centers on the United States, we consider developments as they pertain to the other established democracies as well as to newer and emerging democratic nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. 1994. “Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science38:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., Brad Alexander, and Matthew Gunning. 2006. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” The Journal of Politics68:75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, A.L. and M.L. Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” Journal of Politics. 70:542–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” The Journal of Politics60:634–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. 2005. “The 2004 Presidential Election: The Emergence of a Permanent Majority?” Political Science Quarterly120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2007. Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achterberg, P. and D. Houtman. 2006. “Why Do so Many People Vote ‘Unnaturally’? A Cultural Explanation For Voting Behaviour.” European Journal of Political Research45:75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achterberg, P. 2006. “Class Voting in the New Political Culture.” International Sociology21:237–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science41:718–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J. H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science37:246–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1995. Why Parties?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. M., J. Nagler, and J. R. Willette. 2000. “Measuring the Relative Impact of Issues and the Economy in Democratic Elections.” Electoral Studies19:237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambinder, Marc. 2009. “Race Over?” The Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200901/obama-race, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Ansolabehere, S., S. Iyengar, A. Simon, and N. Valentino. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review88:829–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S., and S. Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Shrinks and Polarizes the Electorate. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen and Charles Stewart, III. 2009. “Amazing Race: How Post-Racial Was Obama's Victory?” Boston Review. http://www.bostonreview.net/BR34.1/ansolabehere_stewart.php, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Back, H. and M. Soininen. 1998. “Immigrants in the Political Process.” Scandinavian Political Studies21:29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri, Delia and Andrew Gelman. 2008. “Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology114:408–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science44:35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2008a. “The Study of Electoral Behavior.” Unpublished manuscript. http://www.princeton.edu/ bartels/elector- albehavior.pdf, accessed January 10, 2009.

  • —— . 2008b. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Allyson Lucinda. 2005. “Dissatisfied Democrats or Retrospective Voters?: Economic Hardship, Political Institutions, and Voting Behavior in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies, 38:417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. R., P. F. Lazarsfeld, and W. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. and M. Black. 2007. Divided America: The Ferocious Power Struggle in American Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais A., L. Massicotte and A. Dobrzynska. 2003. Why Is Turnout Higher in Some Countries than Others? Ottawa: Elections Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, Andre. 2006. “What Affects Voter Turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science9:111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. S. and H. D. Price. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession.” The American Political Science Review69:1240–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemraad, I. 2006. Becoming a Citizen. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, Mark. 2008. “Ambinder: Race Over?” http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ambinder_race_over.php, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Bond, Jon R. and Richard Fleisher. 2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. pp. 226. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Jon R., Richard Fleisher, and Dan B. Wood. 2003. “The Marginal and Time-Varying Effect of Public Approval on Presidential Success in Congress.” The Journal of Politics65:92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, Richard. 2008. “Party Polarization and the Rise of Partisan Voting in U.S. House Elections.” American Politics Research36:62–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box-Steffensmeier JM, S. De Boef, T.M. Lin. 2004. “The dynamics of the partisan gender gap.” American Political Science Review98:515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, David W., Joseph Cooper, and Patricia A. Hurley. 1979. “The Decline of Party in the U. S. House of Representatives, 1887–1968.” Legislative Studies Quarterly4:381–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Mark D. 2005. “The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate.” Political Research Quarterly58:219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Mark and Jeffrey Stonecash. 2007. Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Clem. 2000. “Civil Rights Liberalism and the Supression of a Republican Political Realignment in the United States, 1972–1996.” American Sociological Review65:483–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006a. “Voters, Satisficing, and Policymaking: Recent Directions in the Study of Electoral Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology32:191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. 2002. “Religious Influence and the Politics of Family Decline Concern.” American Sociological Review 67:191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. and J. Manza. 2004. “A Great Divide? Religion and Political Change in US National Elections, 1972– 2000.” Sociological Quarterly45:421–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., J. Manza, and C. Bolzendahl. 2003. “Voting Behavior and Political Sociology: Theories, Debates and Future Directions.” Research in Political Sociology12:137–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., P. Nieuwbeerta, and J. Manza. 2006. “Cleavage-Based Voting Behavior in Cross-national Perspective: Evidence from Six Postwar Democracies.” Social Science Research35:88–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2006b. “The Resilent Voter: Moving Toward Closure in the Debate over Negative Campaigning and Turnout.” The Journal of Politics68:684–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Deborah Jordan and John G. Geer. 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science51:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. D. and J. Wedeking. 2006. “People Who Have Their Tickets but Do not Use Them — “Motor Voter,” Registration, and Turnout Revisited.” American Politics Research34:479–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D. 1965. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.” American Political Science Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1974. “Theory and Voting Research: Some Reflections on Converse's ‘Change in the American Electorate’.” American Political Science Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1987. “The Turnout Problem.” In Elections American Style, edited by A. J. Reichley. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G. and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G. and James Woods. 2002. “The Role of Party Activists in the Evolution of the Abortion Issue.” Political Behavior24:361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Jamie L., Michael H. Crespin, Charles J. Finocchiaro, and David W. Rohde. 2004. “Linking Congressional Districts Across Time: Redistricting and Party Polarization in Congress.” in Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D.T. 2007. “Is There Still a South? And Does it Matter?” Dissent54:92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell Jr, H. W. and W. R. Keech. 1985. “A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance.” The American Political Science Review79:10–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Terry Nichols and Seymour Martin Lipset. 2001. The Breakdown of Class Politics: A Debate on Post-Industrial Stratification. Washington, DC and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H. D., K. Ho, and M. C. Stewart. 2000. “Major's Lesser (Not Minor) Effects: Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support in Britain Since 1979.” Electoral Studies19:255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jon and Jennifer Agiesta. 2008. “3 in 10 Americans Admit to Race Bias.” Washington Post, June 28, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, John J. 1996. Party Decline in America: Policy, Politics, and the Fiscal State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.E. 1974. “Comment on Burnham's ‘Theory and Voting Research’.” American Political Science Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. E. and D. Apter. 1964. “Ideology and Discontent.” In The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics, edited by D. E. Apter. New York: New York Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W. and M. C. Munger. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout In The 1982 United-States House Elections.” American Political Science Review83:217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. “On the Decline of Party Voting in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16:547–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, Evans, John, and Bethany Bryson. 1996. “Have Americans' Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?” The American Journal of Sociology102(3):690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djupe, P. A. and D. A. M. Peterson. 2002. “The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly55:845–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, Thomas and Mary Edsall. 1991. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R.S. 1981. “Why Do People Vote? Because They are Registered.” American Politics Quarterly9:259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. and R. Andersen. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics68:194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Geoffrey. 2000. “The Continued Significance of Class Voting.” Annual Review of Political Science3:401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, John H., Bethany Bryson, and Paul DiMaggio. 2001. “Opinion Polarization: Important Contributions, Necessary Limitations.” American Journal of Sociology106:944–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.H. 2003. “Have Americans' attitudes become more polarized? An update.” Social Science Quarterly84:71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, John. 1996. “ ‘Culture Wars’ or Status Group Ideology as the Basis of US Moral Politics.” The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy16:15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1997. “Worldviews or Social Groups as the Source of Moral Value Attitudes: Implications for the Culture Wars Thesis,” Sociological Forum12(3):371–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science22:426–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1999. “Whatever Happened to the Median Voter?” In MIT Conference on Parties and Congress. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2004. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris and Samuel J. Abrams. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science11:563–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M., S. Abrams, and J. Pope. 2003. “The 2000 US Presidential Election: Can Retrospective Voting Be Saved?” British Journal of Political Science33:163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. and M. Levendusky. 2006. “Disconnected: The Political Class Versus the People.” In Red and Blue Nation, Vol. 1, ed. By P.S. Nivola and D.W. Brady. Washington/Stanford CA: Brookings Inst. Press and Hoover Inst. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, Richard and Jon R Bond. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress.” British Journal of Political Science34:429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, Richard and Jon R. Bond. 2001. “Evidence of Increasing Polarization among Ordinary Citizens.” In American Political Parties: Decline or Resurgence?, edited by J. E. Cohen, R. Fleisher, and P. Kantor. Washington, DC: CQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, Glenn and Kevin Chen. 1995. “Vote Turnout of Nineteenth Amendment Women: The Enduring Effect of Disenfranchisement.” American Journal of Sociology100:972–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M. 2005. “Greater Convenience but not Greater Turnout — The Impact of Alternative Voting Methods on Electoral Participation in the United States.” American Politics Research33:842–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornos, C. A., T. J. Power, and J. C. Garand. 2004. “Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000.” Comparative Political Studies37:909–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, James H. 2006. “Altruism and Turnout.” The Journal of Politics68:674–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, James H. and Oleg Smirnov. 2005. “Dynamic Parties and Social Turnout: An Agent-Based Model.” American Journal of Sociology110:1070–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, James H. and Cindy D. Kam. 2006. “Patience as a Political Virtue: Delayed Gratification and Turnout.” Political Behavior28:113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? New York: Henry Holt & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. 1996. “Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies : Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Edited by L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi, P. Norris, pp. 216–35. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. N. 2004. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark, van der Eijk, Cees and Wouter van der Brug. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries,Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C. 2008. “The White Vote for Obama in the States, Part 2.” http://www.pollster.com/blogs/white_vote_for_ obama_in_the_st_1.php, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Franklin M.N. and W.P.H. de Mino. “Separated powers, divided government, and turnout in US presidential elections.” American Journal of Political Science42:316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, Jennifer and Adam Przeworski. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies40(11):1279–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelineau, Francois. 2007. “Presidents, Political Context, and Economic Accountability: Evidence from Latin America,” Political Reasearch Quarterly60:415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S. and D. P. Green. 2000a. “The Effect of a Nonpartisan Get-Out-the-Vote Drive: An Experimental Study of Leafletting.” Journal Of Politics62:846–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2000b. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review94:653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2004. “Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? A Field Experiment (vol 65, pg 75, 2001).” Public Opinion Quarterly68:489–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., D. P. Green, and C. W. Larimer. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large- Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review102:33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J.H. 2001. “Class Politics in Advanced Industrial Societies.” In The Breakdown of Class Politics, edited by T.N. Clark and S.M. Lipset. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, B. T. and J. M. Wilson. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science45:899–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2003. “Causal Attribution and Economic Voting in American Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly56:271.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006. “Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science50:127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C. A. E. and R. J. Bhansali. 1970. “Political Economy.” Political Studies18:43–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Mark and Miki Caul. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies33:1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. M. and A. Wuffle. 2005. “Vindicating Anthony Downs.” Ps-Political Science & Politics38:737–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. P., A. S. Gerber, and D. W. Nickerson. 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” Journal of Politics65:1083–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Donald P. and Alan S. Gerber. 2004. Get Out the Vote! How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Donald P. and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. 1993. “Is Turnout the Paradox that Ate Rational Choice Theory?” In Information, Participation, and Choice. Edited by B. Grofman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groseclose, Tim, Steven D. Levitt, and James M. Jr. Snyder. 1999. “Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress.” The American Political Science Review93:33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, Ron. 2006. Democracy for All: Restoring Immigrant Voting Rights in the United States. New York: Rout- ledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlig, Eric, Marc Hetherington, and Bruce Larson. 2006. “The Price of Leadership: Campaign Money and the Polarization of Congressional Parties.” The Journal of Politics68:992–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. 2004. “From Class to Culture.” American Journal Of Sociology110:400–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters' National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science40:372–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” The American Political Science Review95:691–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R.E. 1999. “Campaign and contextual influences on voter participation in state legislative elections.” American Politics Quarterly, 27:403–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Thomas M. and Scott D. McClurg. 2005. “The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science49:689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder K. 2006. “Voting and registration in the election of November 2004.” Current Population Reports: P20–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M., C. Brooks, and J. Manza. 1995. “The Democratic Class Struggle in the United States, 1948–1992.” American Sociological Review60:805–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R. Robert and Carol Weitzel Kohfeld. 1989. Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, James Davison, A. Wolfe, et al. 2006. Is There a Culture War? A Dialogue on Values and American Public Life, edited by E. J. Dionne Jr, and Michael Cromartie. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center: Brooking Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R.W. 1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review81:405–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R. W. and R. A. Miller. 1995. “Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies27:467–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R.A. 1997. “The Mobilization of U.S. State Electorates in the 1988 and 1990 Elections.” Journal of Politics59:520–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R.A., R.D. Brown, and G.C. Wright. 1998. “Registration, Turnout, and the Electoral Representativeness of the U.S. State Electorates.” American Politics Quarterly26:259–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Robert A. and Thomas M. Carsey. 2007. “US Senate Campaigns, Negative Advertising, and Voter Mobilization in the 1998 Midterm Election.” Electoral Studies26:180–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2003. “Partisan Polarization in Presidential Support: The Electoral Connection.” Congress & The Presidency30:1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, Richard. 2007. “Altruism and the Decision to Vote: Explaining and Testing High Voter Turnout.” Rationality and Society19:5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R.J. 1971. The Winning of the Midwest. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Correa, Michael. 2005. “Language Provisions Under the Voting Rights Act: How Effective Are They?” Social Science Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited)86:549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordahl, H. 2006. “An Economic Analysis of Voting in Sweden.” Public Choice127:251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, Satoshi. 2000. “A New Solution to the collective Action Problem: The Paradox of Voter Turnout.” American Sociological Review65:433–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, J. A. and S. A. Banducci. 2008. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science38:311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, Jeffrey A. and Susan A. Banducci. 2007. “Party Mobilization and Political Participation In New and Old Democracies.” Party Politics13:217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, K.M. and J.R. Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men.” American Journal of Political Science 43:864–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Karen M. 2006. “The Gender Gap.” PS: Political Science & Politics39:447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerbo, Harold R. and Juan J. Gonzalez. 2003. “Class and Non-voting in Comparative Perspective: Possible Causes and Consequences in the United States.” Research in Political Sociology12:175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V.O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O. and M. C. Cummings. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. R. 2000. “Economic Retrospective Voting and Incentives for Policymaking.” Electoral Studies19:427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D. R. and D. R. Kiewiet. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science23:495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleppner, Paul. 1982. Who Voted? The Dynamics of Electoral Turnout, 1870–1980. New York: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostadinova, T. 2003. “Voter Turnout Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe.” European Journal of Political Research42:741–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostadinova, Tatiana and Timothy J. Power. 2007. “Does Democratization Depress Participation? Voter Turnout in the Latin American and Eastern European Transitional Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly60:363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kousser, J. Morgan. 1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One Party South, 1880–1910. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” The American Political Science Review65:131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate-versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.” The American Political Science Review77:92–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzi, Michelle and Gina M. S. Lambright. 2007. “Voter Turnout in Africa's Multiparty Regimes,” Comparative Political Studies40:665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanoue, D. J. 1994. “Retrospective and Prospective Voting in Presidential-Year Elections.” Political Research Quarterly47:193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R. and David P. Redlawsk. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R. and G. M. Pomper. 2001. “Effects of negative campaigning on turnout in US Senate Elections, 1988–1998.” Journal of Politics63:804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R., L. Sigelman, and I. B. Rovner. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics69:1176–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F., B.R. Berelson, and H. Gaudet. 1948. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, G.C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, Geoffrey C. and Thomas M. Carsey. 1998. “Why Do Party Activists Convert? An Analysis of Individual- Level Change on the Abortion Issue.” Political Research Quarterly51:723–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2002. “Party Polarization and “Conflict Extension” in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science46:789–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, and Juliana Menasce Horowitz. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science9:83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, J. E. 2008. “Commentary on “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation”.” Political Research Quarterly61:46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, Jan E. 1995. “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly48:181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2001. Strength in Numbers? The Political Mobilization of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, Jan E. and Jonathan Nagler. 2007. “Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the U.S. Electorate, 1964–2004.” The Journal of Politics69:430–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, David K. and Thomas R. Palfrey. 2007. “The Paradox of Voter Participation? A Laboratory Study.” American Political Science Review101:143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. 1985. “Pocketbook Voting in US National Election Studies: Fact or Artifact?” American Journal of Political Science29:348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1986. “Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy.” American Journal of Political Science30:315–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1997. “Who's the Chef? Economic Voting Under a Dual Executive.” European Journal of Political Research31:315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006. “Does Economics Still Matter? Econometrics and the Vote.” Journal of Politics68:208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck M.S. and M. Paldam. 2000. “Economic Voting: An Introduction.” Electoral Studies19:113–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S., R. Nadeau, and A. Elias. 2008a. “Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data.” American Journal of Political Science52:84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. and T. W. Rice. 1984. “Forecasting US House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly9:475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. and M. Stegmaier. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science3:183–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. and C. Tien. 1996. “The Future in Forecasting: Prospective Presidential Models.” American Politics Research24:468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M.S., William G. Jacoby, Helmut Norpoth, and Herbert F. Weisberg. 2008b. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review91:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindaman, Kara and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2002. “Issue Evolution, Political Parties, and the Culture Wars.” Political Research Quarterly55:91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M. 2001. “The Decline of Class Ideologies.” In The Breakdown of Class Politics, edited by T.N. Clark and S.M. Lipset. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S.M. and S. Rokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments(pp. 1–64), edited by S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lublin, David and Stephen D. Voss. 2000. “Racial Redistricting and Realignment in Southern State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science44:792–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, R. C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science31:856–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, G. and M. Marsh. 2007. “Introduction: Consequences of Low Turnout.” Electoral Studies26:539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, M. B., R. S. Erikson, and J. A. Stimson. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the US Economy.” The American Political Science Review86:597–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manza, Jeff and Clem Brooks. 1999. Social Cleavages and Political Change: Voter Alignments and U.S. Party Coalitions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, G. B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science32:137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M. D. and D. Hill. 1999. “Did Motor Voter Work?” American Politics Quarterly27:296–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, S. D. 2003. “Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly56:449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2004. “Indirect Mobilization — The Social Consequences of Party Contacts in an Election Campaign.” American Politics Research32:406–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006a. “The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science50:737–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006b. “Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement and Political Talk on Electoral Participation.” Political Behavior28:349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M.P. and S.L. Popkin. 2001. “The Myth of the Vanishing Voter.” American Political Science Review95:963–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Michael. 2009. “2008 Unofficial Voter Turnout.” http://elections.gmu.edu/preliminary_vote_2008.html, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Michelson, M.R. 2006. “Mobilizing the Latino Youth Vote.” Social Science Quarterly87:1188–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H. and M. P. Wattenberg. 1985. “Throwing the Rascals Out: Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952–1980.” The American Political Science Review79:359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.E. and J.M. Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Gary and Norman Schofield. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” The American Political Science Review97:245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouw T. and M. Sobel. 2001. “Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion.” American Journal of Sociology. 106:913–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. E. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” The American Political Science Review64:18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D.C. 2002. “The Consequences of Cross-cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science46:838–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, Richard and Harold W. Stanley. 1993. “Class Polarization in Partisanship Among Native Southern Whites, 1952–90.” American Journal of Political Science37:900–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannestad, P. and M. Paldam. 1993. “The Demand for the Public Sector in the Rich Welfare State of Denmark: Two Polls From 1990.” Preferences and Democracy. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1994. “The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years.” Public Choice79:213–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1997. “The Grievance Asymmetry Revisited: A Micro Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1986–1992.” European Journal of Political Economy13:81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2000. “Into Pandora's Box of Economic Evaluations: A Study of the Danish Macro VP-function, 1986–1997.” Electoral Studies19:123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, D. W., R. D. Friedrichs, and D.C. King. 2006. “Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan.” Political Research Quarterly59:85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, David W. 2007. “Quality Is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls.” American Journal of Political Science51:269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwbeerta, P. 2001. “The Democratic Struggle in Postwar Societies.” In The Breakdown of Class Politics, edited by T.N. Clark and S.M. Lipset. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, David. 2006. “A Field Experiment on the Effects of Negative Campaign Mail on Voter Turnout in a Municipal Election.” Political Research Quarterly59:203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noah, Timothy. 2008. “What We Didn't Overcome.” http://www.slate.com/id/2204251/, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Norpoth, H. 1996. “Presidents and the Prospective Voter.” The Journal of Politics58:776–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. 2002. “Ballots not Bullets: Electoral Systems, Ethnic Minorities and Democratization.” Chapter 8 in The Architecture of Democracy. Edited by A. Reynolds and S. Mainwaring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, A.J. 1992. “Primaries, General-Elections, and Voter Turnout.” American Politics Quarterly20:205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P.C. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1965. The Logics of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacek, A. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp.723–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacek, A. and B. Radcliff. 1995. “Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Center Parties — A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal Of Political Science25:137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?” The American Political Science Review81:23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I. and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakulski, J. 2001. “Class Paradigm and Politics.” In The Breakdown of Class Politics, edited by T.N. Clark and S.M. Lipset. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. 1991. “How Robust is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Linan, A. 2001. “Neo-Institutional Accounts of Voter Turnout: Moving Beyond Industrial Democracies.” Electoral Studies20:281–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz, David W. 2002. “Partisan Conversion in the 1990s: Ideological Realignment Meets Measurement Theory.” The Journal of Politics64:1199–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, J., J. Barth, M. Kropf, and E. T. Jones. 2008. “Mobilizing the Seldom Voter: Campaign Contact and Effects in High-Profile Elections.” Political Behavior30:97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox and Richard Cloward. 2000. Why Americans Still Don't Vote: And Why Politicians Want It That Wa y. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1989. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutzer E. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review96:41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Keith T. and R. Steven Daniels. 1985. “Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980.” The American Political Science Review79:373–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Keith T. and Howard Rosenthal. 1984a. “The Polarization of American Politics.” The Journal of Politics46:1061–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1984b. “U.S. Presidential Elections 1968–80: A Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science28:282–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science35:228–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26:5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.B. 1986. “Amercan Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review80:17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell Jr, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science7:273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2009. “Constraints and Choices: Electoral Participation in Historical Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies42(1):4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliff, B. 1992. “The Welfare-State, Turnout, and the Economy — A Comparative-Analysis.” American Political Science Review86:444–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 1994. “Turnout and the Democratic Vote.” American Politics Quarterly22:259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliff, B. and P. Davis. 2000. “Labor Organization and Electoral Participation in Industrial Democracies.” American Journal Of Political Science44:132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, Francisco O., Yasemin Soysal, and Suzanne Shanahan. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990.” American Sociological Review62:735–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, M. D., D. Sikkink, and C. Smith. 1999. “Voting with the Christian Right: Contextual and Individual Patterns of Electoral Influence.” Social Forces77:1375–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. and P.C. Ordeshook. 1973. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review62:25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Jason M. and Steven S. Smith. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science47:305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Kenneth M. and Erik Wibbels. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanation.” The American Political Science Review93(3):575–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, Steven J. and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, T. J. 2006. “Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility Judgments.” Political Psychology27:99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusk, Jerrold G. and John J. Stucker. 1978. “The Effect of the Southern System of Election Laws on Voting Participation: A Reply to V.O. Key, Jr.” In The History of American Electoral Behavior, edited by Joel H. Silbey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Kyle L. and Alan I. Abramowitz. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.” American Politics Research32:285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 2002. “Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care?” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreckhise, William D. and Todd G. Shields. 2003. “Ideological Realignment in the Contemporary U.S. Electorate Revisited.” Social Science Quarterly84:596–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, B.E. and R. Johnston. 2006. The End of Southern Exceptionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Nate. 2008. “For Obama, Will Familiarity Erode Contempt?” http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/ for-obama-will-familiarity-erode.html, accessed January 13, 2009.

  • Sinclair, B. 2000. “Institutions and politics: What matters most for policy-making?” Legislative Studies Quarterly25:153–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eric R.A.N. 1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, P. M. 1993. “The New Look in Public Opinion Research.” Political Science: The State of the Discipline II219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, James M. Jr. and Tim Groseclose. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science44:193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. 1973. “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.” The American Economic Review63:160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Mark D. Brewer, and Mack D. Mariani. 2002. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2006. “The Income Gap.” PS: Political Science & Politics39:461–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, David. 2008. “Supreme Court Upholds Voter Identification Law in Indiana.” New York Times, April 29, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, M. and H. W. Chappell Jr. 1996. “The Rationality of Economic Voting Revisited.” The Journal of Politics58:224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theriault, Sean M. 2003. “The Case of the Vanishing Moderates: Party Polarization in the Modern Congress.” The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006. “Party Polarization in the US Congress.” Party Politics12:483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpone, Richard J. 1998. “Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States.” American Political Science Review92:145–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, Christopher and Jeff Manza. 2002. “Democratic Contraction? The Political Consequences of Felon Disen- franchisement in the United States.” American Sociological Review67:777–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— . 2006. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valelly, Richard. 1990. “Vanishing Voters.” American Prospect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valelly, Richard M. 2005. The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, et al. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. and N.H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, M. P. 1984. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1980. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weakliem, David L. 1997. “Race Versus Class? Racial Composition and Class Voting, 1936–1992.” Social Forces75:939–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weakliem, D. 2001. “Social Class and Voting: The Case Against Decline.” In The Breakdown of Class Politics, edited by T.N. Clark and S.M. Lipset. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weakliem, D. 2001. “Social Class and Voting: The Case Against Decline.” In The Breakdown of Class Politics, edited by T.N. Clark and S.M. Lipset. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, K. A. 2002. “The Breakdown of Class Politics: A Debate on Post-industrial Stratification.” American Journal of Sociology108:675–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, Kurt. 2002. “Limitations of Rational-Choice Institutionalism for the Study of Latin American Politics.” Studies in International Comparative Development37(1):57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde and Lee Sigelman. 2001. “Political Mobilization in the Pews: Religious Contacting and Electoral Turnout.” Social Science Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited)82:524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winders, Bill. 1999. “The Roller Coaster of Class Conflict: Class Segments, Mass Mobilization, and Voter Turnout in the U.S., 1840–1996.” Social Forces77:833–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrecht, C. and R.E. Hero. 2005. The Politics of Democratic Inclusion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Alan. 1998. One Nation, After All: What Middle Class Americans Really Think About God, Country, Family, Racism, Welfare, Immigration, Homosexuality, Work, the Right, the Left, and Each Other. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R.E. and S.J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. E. and J. Hoffman. 2001. “Registering and Voting with Motor Voter.” Ps-Political Science & Politics34:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Redding, K., Barwis, P.J., Summers, N. (2010). Elections and Voting. In: Leicht, K.T., Jenkins, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Politics. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics