Skip to main content

Corporations, Capitalists, and Campaign Finance

  • Chapter
Handbook of Politics

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Financial contributions to political parties and candidates are an important source of political influence in many societies. This is, perhaps, nowhere more true than in the United States, where candidates' need to raise and spend vast sums of money is accentuated by a system of weak and decentralized parties, single-member-district elections, nomination by party primaries, limited public funding, and media intensive campaigns that emphasize image and personality over clear policy differences. Given the vast inequalities in wealth in the U.S., rich contributors — including wealthy capitalists and giant corporations — play a dominant role in campaign finance and, thereby, exercise disproportionate influence over politics and public policy (Clawson et al. 1998; Domhoff 2006; Mills 1956).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, M. P. (1991). Capitalist response to state regulation: Theories of the state and political finance in the New Deal. American Sociological Review, 56, 679–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. P., & Broyles, P. (1989). Class hegemony and political finance: Presidential campaign contributions of wealthy capitalist families. American Sociological Review, 54, 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. P., & Broyles, P. (1991). Campaign finance reforms and the presidential campaign contributions of wealthy capitalist families. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 738–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. E. (1962). Financing the 1960 election. Princeton: Citizens' Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. E. (1966). Financing the 1964 election. Princeton: Citizens' Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. E. (1971). Financing the 1968 election. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. E. (1976). Financing the 1972 election. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. E. (1984). Financing politics: Money, elections, and political reform. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, G. J. (1985). Business involvement in campaign finance: Factors influencing the decision to form a corporate PAC. PS, 28, 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, K. L. (1986). The role of corporations in the 1980 U.S. congressional elections. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boies, J. L. (1989). Money, business, and the state: Material interests, Fortune 500 corporations, and the size of political action committees. American Sociological Review, 54, 821–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. W. Jr., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious money: Fundraising and contributing in presidential nomination campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broyles, P. A. (1993). The corporate elite goes to Washington: Presidential campaign contributions of corporate officers. Social Science Research 22, 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (1987). The political partisanship of American business. American Sociological Review, 52, 732–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (1991). Director interlocks and the political behavior of corporations and corporate elites. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 537–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (2000). The myth of old money liberalism: The politics of the Forbes 400 richest Americans. Social Problems, 47, 360–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (2001). The two faces of capital: Corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. American Sociological Review, 66, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V., & Salt, J. (1990). The politics of capitalist class segments: A test of corporate liberalism theory. Social Problems, 37, 601–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Responsive Politics (2009). Washington, DC (January 15, 2009); http://www.opensecrets.org.

  • Clawson, D., Kaufman, A., & Neustadtl, A. (1985). Corporate PACs for a new Pax Americana. Insurgent Sociologist, 13, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D., & Neustadtl, A. (1989). Interlocks, PACs, and corporate conservatism. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 749–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A., & Bearden, J. (1986). The logic of business unity: Corporate contributions in the 1980 congressional elections. American Sociological Review, 51, 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A., & Weller, M. (1998). Dollars and votes: How business campaign contributions subvert democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1981). The New Right's road to power. New Left Review, 128, 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. W. (1972). Fat cats and democrats: The role of the big rich in the party of the common man. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. W. (2006). Who rules America? Power, politics, and social change. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. (1995). Who's running America? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Election Commission (2008). Washington, DC (May 15, 2008); http://www.fec.gov.

  • Ferguson, T. (1984). From normalcy to New Deal. International Organization, 38, 41–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. (1995). Golden rule: The investment theory of party competition and the logic of money-driven political systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T., & Rogers, J. (1986). Right Turn. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francia, P. L., Green, J. C., Herrnson, P. S., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (2003). The financiers of presidential elections. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L., & Wayman, F. W. (1990). Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review, 84, 797–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, E., & Mulkern, J. R. (1982). Business in politics: Campaign strategies of corporate political action committees. Lexington, Ma.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard, A. (1960). The costs of democracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, G. (1963). The triumph of conservatism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, F. (1937). America's sixty families. New York: Vanguard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S. (1989). Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations, American Journal of Sociology, 95, 401–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S. (1992). The structure of corporate political action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute on Money in State Politics (2009). Helena, MT (January 15, 2009); http://www.followthemoney.org.

  • Neustadtl, A., & Clawson, D. (1988). Corporate political groupings: Does ideology unify business political behavior? American Sociological Review, 53, 172–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overacker, L. (1932). Money in elections. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overacker, L. (1933). Campaign funds in a depression year. American Political Science Review, 27, 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overacker, L. (1937). Campaign funds in the presidential election of 1936. American Political Science Review, 31, 473–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overacker, L. (1941). Campaign finance in the presidential election of 1940. American Political Science Review, 35, 701–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overacker, L. (1945). Presidential campaign funds, 1944. American Political Science Review, 39, 899–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, R. (1977). Market structure and campaign contributions. Public Choice, 31, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Citizen (2000). Purchasing power: The corporate-White House alliance to pass the China trade bill over the will of the American people. Washington, DC: Public Citizen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, D. D., & Jenkins, S. (2005). A meta-analysis of campaign contributions' impact on roll call voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale, K. (1975). Power shift. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, J. (1989). Sunbelt capital and conservative political realignment in the 1970s and 1980s. Critical Sociology, 16, 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, T., Neustadtl, A., & Clawson, D. (1995). Business and the conservative shift: Corporate PAC contributions, 1976–1986. Social Science Quarterly, 76, 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the U.S. and U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M. J. (2000). New Deal fat cats. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J. (1968). The corporate ideal in the liberal state: 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burris, V. (2010). Corporations, Capitalists, and Campaign Finance. In: Leicht, K.T., Jenkins, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Politics. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics