Advertisement

Nuclear Pollution

  • David Hafemeister

Abstract

Radiation has many positive uses, such as medical diagnostics, cancer therapy, radiosurgery from many collimated beams, nondestructive testing of structures, smoke alarms, and food irradiation. However, the use of radiation must be controlled because of possible health effects. Without taking time to think about possible danger, Louis Slotin used his hands to separate a critical mass at Los Alamos on May 21, 1946. He died in nine days, the first victim of the postwar nuclear arms race. Slotin did not die of cancer; rather his body stopped functioning after a dose of over 10 sieverts (1 Sv = 100rem). A one-time dose of 4 to 5 Sv is lethal to 50% of victims. This chapter does not deal with such large doses, but rather with doses under 10-100 mSv, which can cause cancer after a latency period of some 10-30 years.

Keywords

Failure Probability Nuclear Weapon Steam Explosion Indoor Radon Smoke Alarm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ahearne, J., et al. (1997). Nuclear waste issues, Phys. Today 50, 22–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alverez, R., et al. (2003). Reducing the hazards from stored spent power reactor fuel in the United States, Sci. Global Secur. 11, 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Physical Society (1975). Light Water Reactor Safety, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, S1–S124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Physical Society (1977). Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Management, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, S1–S186.Google Scholar
  5. American Physical Society (1985). Radionuclide Release from Severe Accidents at Nuclear Power Plants, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, S1–S154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkenbus, J. and C. Forsberg (1995). Internationalizing nuclear safety, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 20, 179–212.Google Scholar
  7. Bodansky, D. (2004). Nuclear Energy, American Institute of Physics Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Boeker, E. and R. Grondelle (1995). Environmental Physics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bupp, I. and J. Derian (1978). Light Water, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Cochran, T., et al. (1993). Radioactive contamination at Chelyabinsk-65, Russia, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 18, 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig, P. (1999). High-level nuclear waste: The status of Yucca Mountain, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 24, 461–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenbud, M. and R. Gesell (1997). Environmental Radioactivity, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Fetter, S. and F. von Hippel (1990). The hazard from plutonium dispersal by nuclear-warhead accidents, Sci. Global Secur. 2, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flynn, F. and P. Slovic (1995). Yucca mountain: Prospects for America's high-level nuclear waste program, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 20, 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forsberg, C. and A. Weinberg (1990). Advanced reactors, passive safety and acceptance of nuclear energy, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 15, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Golay, M. (1993). Advanced fission power reactors, Ann. Rev. Particle Sci. 43, 297–332.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. House of Representatives (1990). Nuclear Weapons Safety (Drell), HASC-15, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Lamarsh, J. (1977). Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, Addison Wesley, Reading MA.Google Scholar
  19. Levi, M. and Kelly, H. (March/April 2002). Dirty bombs: response to a threat, Public Interest Report, Federation of American ScientistsGoogle Scholar
  20. Mabuchi, K. (1998). Effects of Ionizing Radiation: Atomic Bomb Survivors, L. Peterson and S. Abrahamson (Eds.), Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. MacFarlane, A. (2001). Interim storage of spent fuel in the United States, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 26, 201–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marcus, G. and A. Levin (2002). New designs for the nuclear renaissance, Phys. Today 55(4), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mettler, F. and A. Upton (eds.) (1995). Medical Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  24. National Research Council (1990). Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. National Research Council (1992). Nuclear Power: Technical and Institutional Options for the Future, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. National Research Council (1999). Health Effects of Exposure to Radon, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council (2000). Long-Term Institutional Management of US Department of Energy Legacy Waste Sites, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Nero, A. (1979). Guidebook to Nuclear Reactors, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  29. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975). Reactor Safety Study (Rasmussen), Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Office of Technology Assessment (1991). Complex Cleanup: The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production, OTA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Peterson, L. and S. Abrahamson (eds.) (1998). Effects of Ionizing Radiation: Atomic Bomb Survivors and Their Children, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Rasmussen, N. (1981). The application of probabilistic risk assessment techniques to energy technologies, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 6, 123–138.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, R., R. Shaw and K. Stahlkopf (1985). Decommissioning of commercial nuclear power plants, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 10, 251–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schillaci, M. (1995). Radiation and Risk (UNSCEAR94 data), Los Alamos Sci. 23, 104–105.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, R. (1999). Effects of ionizing radiation at low doses, Am. J. Phys. 67, 322–327.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Hafemeister
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis ObispoUSA

Personalised recommendations