The Energy Situation

  • David Hafemeister


The world continues to indulge its dangerous addiction to Middle East oil. Seemingly little has been learned from the oil embargo of 1973–74 that resulted in long gas lines, double-digit inflation and consumer helplessness.


Gross Domestic Product Rankine Cycle Energy Information Administration Energy Information Administration Combine Cycle Power Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alpert, S. and M. Gluckman (1986). Coal gasification systems for power generation, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 11, 315–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert, S. (1991). Clean coal technology, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 16, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benka, S. (Ed.) (2002). The energy challenge, Phys. Today 55(4), 38–75.Google Scholar
  4. Borowitz, S. (1999). Farewell To Fossil Fuels: Reviewing America's Energy Policy, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1995). How Many People Can the Earth Support? Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Energy Information Agency (2006). Annual Energy Outlook, Annual Energy Review, International Energy, Largest oil and gas fields (1993), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Fay, J. (1980). Risks of LNG and LPG, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 5, 89–105.Google Scholar
  8. Howes, R. and A. Fainberg (Eds.) (1991). The Energy Sourcebook, American Institute of Physics Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hubbert, K. (1981). The world's evolving energy system, Am. J. Phys. 49, 1007–1029.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Krenz, J. (1984). Energy: Conversion and Utilization, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Matos, G. and L. Wagner (1998). Consumption of materials in the United States, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 23, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Research Council (1995). Coal Energy for the Future, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council (1999). Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. National Research Council (2001). Growing Populations, Changing Landscapes: Studies from India, China, and the United States, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Office of Technology Assessment (1991). US Oil Vulnerability, OTA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Renewing Our Energy Future, OTA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Rogner, H. (1997). An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources, Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 22, 217–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scientific American Energy Panel (1998). Preventing the next oil crunch, Sci. Am. 278(3), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. US Energy Information Administration (2000). US Crude Oil, Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquid Reserves, EIA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. US Energy Information Administration (2004). Annual Energy Outlook, EIA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. US Energy Information Administration (2004). International Energy Outlook, EIA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. US Energy Information Administration (2005). Monthly Energy Review, EIA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Weisz, P. (2004). Basic choices and constraints on long-term energy supplies, Phys. Today 57(7), 47–52.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Yergin, D. (1991). The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Hafemeister
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis ObispoUSA

Personalised recommendations