Advertisement

Evaluation of Neurologic Injury Following Regional Anesthesia

  • Quinn H. Hogan
  • Lloyd Hendrix
  • Safwan Jaradeh

Abstract

Modern anesthesia is a highly predictable undertaking with a very low failure rate. The ability to produce successful anesthesia is a less important characteristic of excellent anesthetic practice than the ability to recognize and treat adverse perioperative events. Recognition of myocardial ischemia or prompt treatment of catastrophic bleeding are examples of the situations requiring careful diagnosis and calm, decisive action. This same approach should prevail when the adverse event is a neurologic complication of regional anesthesia, only there is an added difficulty. At few other times in the practice of anesthesia will a practitioner be so directly confronted with responsibility for an adverse outcome as with a complication from neural blockade, because in a sense the “smoking gun” is clearly in our hands. Additional opprobrium may stem from the common misconceptions that complication rates should be zero in the practice of anesthesiology, and that the complication would not have occurred if only a general anesthetic had been performed.

Keywords

Motor Unit Regional Anesthesia Epidural Hematoma Compute Tomography Number Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yeun EC, Layzer RB, Weitz SR, Olney RK. Neurologic complications of lumbar epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Neurology 1995;45:1795–1801.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore DC, Hain RF, Ward A, Bridenbaugh LD. Importance of the perineural spaces in nerve blocking. JAMA 1954;156:1050–1053.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osborn AG. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eddy DM, Clanton CH. The art of diagnosis: solving the clinicopathological exercise. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1263–1268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black WC, Welch HG. Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimation of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1237–1243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quinn H. Hogan
    • 1
  • Lloyd Hendrix
    • 2
  • Safwan Jaradeh
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations