Outcome Studies Comparing Regional and General Anesthesia

  • Gabriella Iohom
  • George Shorten


Substantial increase in healthcare costs has contributed to the development of outcomes research in the United States. Outcomes research evaluates the effectiveness of healthcare interventions in many aspects of patient care (clinical outcomes, functional health status, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life) and reflects national trends in determining appropriateness, value, and quality of health care.1 Outcomes research in regional anesthesia has traditionally focused on clinically oriented outcomes, such as overall mortality and major morbidity (cardiovascular, pulmonary, coagulation, cognitive, gastrointestinal, immune, stress response).2 This chapter examines the currently available evidence comparing regional and general anesthesia in terms of clinically oriented outcomes.


Epidural Analgesia Regional Anesthesia Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Epidural Group General Anesthesia Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Orkin FK. Application of outcomes research to clinical decision making in cardiovascular medicine. In: Tuman K, ed. Outcome Measurements. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999:39–66.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu CL, Fleisher LA. Outcomes research in regional anesthesia and analgesia. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1232–1242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gold BS, Kitz DS, Lecky JH, Neuhaus JM. Unanticipated admission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery. JAMA 1989;262:3008–3010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonnet F, Marret E. Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005;95(l):52–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hearst N, Grady D, Barron HV, Kerlikowske K. Research using existing data: secondary data analysis, ancillary studies, and systematic reviews. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, eds. Designing Clinical Research. An Epidemiologic Approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:195–215.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bode RH Jr, Lewis KP, Zarich SW, et al. Cardiac outcome after peripheral vascular surgery: comparison of general and regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996;84:3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher DM. How do we obtain outcome data: randomized clinical trials versus observational databases. In: Tuman K, ed. Outcome Measurements. Baltimore: Williams_& Wilkins; 1999:23–37.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capellen JC, Ioannidis JPA, deFerranti SD, et al. Large trials versus meta-analyses of smaller trials: how do their results compare? JAMA 1996;276:1332–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, et al. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomised controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997;337:536–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gregoire G, Derderian F, Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:159–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson FA, Hish J, White K, Fitzgerald RH, for the hip and knee registry investigators. Temporal trend in prevention of venous thromboembolism following primary total hip replacement or knee arthroplasty 1996–2001. Chest 2003;124:349S–356S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Auerbach AD, Goldman L. Beta-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in non-cardiac surgery. JAMA 2002;287:1435–1444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Collins R, Gray R, Godwin J, Peto R. Avoidance of large biases and large random errors in the assessment of moderate treatment effects: the need for systematic overviews. Stat Med 1987;6:245–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Leon-Casasola OA. When it comes to outcome, we need to define what a perioperative epidural technique is. Anesth Analg 2003;96:315–318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 2003;362:1921–1928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1474–1506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeager MP, Glass DD, Neff RK, Brinck-Johnsen T. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in high risk surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1987;66:729–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, March RJ, et al. Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on coagulation and outcome after major vascular surgery. Anesth Analg 1991;73:696–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Christopherson R, Beattie C, Frank SM, et al. Perioperative morbidity in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Anesthesiology 1993;79:422–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of post-operative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 2000;321:1493–1497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:450–455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parker MJ, Handoll HHG, Griffiths R. Anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(4):CD000521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu SS, Block B, Wu CL. Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2004;101:153–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 1998;86:598–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P. Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2001;93:853–858.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, et al. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2003;290:2455–2463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hall GM. Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia: is there an impact on outcome after major surgery? IARS 2005 Review Course Lectures, Supplement to Anesthesia_& Analgesia.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu CL, Hsu W, Richman JM, Raja SN. Postoperative cognitive function as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29:257–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK. Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veteran Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg 2001;234:560–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norris EJ, Beattie C, Perler BA, et al. Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1054–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rigg JRA, Jamrozik K, Myles PS. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1276–1282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kristensen BB, Jensen PS, Kehlet H. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after hip fracture surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2005;102:1197–1204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ganapathy S, McCartney CJL, Beattie WS, Chan VWS. Best evidence in anesthetic practice. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:143–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Andreae M. Underdosing the epidural invalidates a good clinical trial. Anesthesiology 2002;97:1026–1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karanikolas M, Kalauokalani D, Swarm R. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia: is there really no benefit? Anesthesiology 2002;97:1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rigg JRA, Jamrozik K, Clarke M. How can we demonstrate that new developments in anesthesia are of real clinical importance? Anesthesiology 1997;86:1008–1010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peyton PJ, Myles PS, Silbert BS, et al. Perioperative epidural analgesia and outcome after major abdominal surgery in high-risk patients. Anesth Analg 2003;96:548–554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    O’Hara DA, Duff A, Berlin JA, et al. The effect of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes in hip fracture repair. Anesthesiology 2000;92:947–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu CL, Anderson GF, Herbert R, Lietman SA, Fleisher LA. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality after total hip replacement surgery in Medicare patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:271–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P, et al. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology 1999;91:8–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chelly JE, Greger J, Gebhard R, et al. Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:436–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Holte K, Kehlet H. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia-effects on surgical stress responses and implications for postoperative nutrition. Clin Nutr 2002;21:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Grant SA, Nielsen KC, Greengrass RA, Steele SM, Klein SM. Continuous peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:209–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Harrop-Griffiths W, Picard J. Continuous regional analgesia: can we afford not to use it? Anaesthesia 2001;56:299–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rosenquist RW, Rosenberg J. Postoperative pain guidelines. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28:279–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Carli F, Mayo N, Kluben K, et al. Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2002;97:540–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1123–1133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Macrae WA. Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:88–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Callesen B, Kehlet H. Prospective study of chronic pain after hernia repair. Br J Surg 1999;86:1528–1531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Katz J, Jackson M, Kavanagh BP, Sandler AN. Acute pain after thoracic surgery predicts long-term post-thoracotomy pain. Clin J Pain 1996;12:50–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Senturk M, Ozcan PE, Talu GK, et al. The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 2002;94:11–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Obata H, Saito S, Fujita N, et al. Epidural block with mepivacaine before surgery reduces long-term post-thoracotomy pain. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:1127–1132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriella Iohom
    • 1
  • George Shorten
    • 2
  1. 1.Cork University Hospital and National University of IrelandCorkIreland
  2. 2.Cork University Hospital and University College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations