Computer Aided Tissue Engineering Scaffold Fabrication

  • M. W. Naing
  • C. K. Chua
  • K. F. Leong


A novel CAD system of structures based on convex polyhedral unit has been created for use with Rapid Prototyping (RP) technology in tissue engineering applications. The prototype system is named the Computer Aided System for Tissue Scaffolds or CASTS.

CASTS consists of a basic library of units that can assemble uniform matrices of various shapes. Each open-cellular unit is a unique configuration of linked struts. Together with an algorithmwhich allows the designer to specify the unit cell and the required dimensions, the system is able to automatically generate a structure that is suitable for the intended tissue engineering application. Altering the parameters can easily change the desired shape and spatial arrangement of the structures.

The main advantage of CASTS is the elimination of reliance on user skills, much unlike conventional techniques of scaffold fabrication. From a small range of basic units, many different scaffolds of controllable architecture and desirable properties can be designed. The system interface of CASTS in Pro/ENGINEER is user friendly and allows complete transfer of knowledge between users without the need for complex user manuals.

A femur implant was successfully fabricated using Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) and a standard commercial material Duraform™ Polyamide. Following the successful fabrication of the scaffold, further investigations were planned to verify the viability of the system. A disc shape scaffold was designed for this purpose. In this disc-shaped design, four different strut lengths were used, resulting in four different pore sizes and porosity. Scaffolds of the one-unit layer cells built using Duraform™ Polyamide were then examined under a light microscope to check the consistency and reproducibility of the microstructures.

Three types of biomaterials were tested on CASTS: PEEK, PEEK-HA biocomposite, and PCL. The scaffolds built showed very good definition of the pre-designed microarchitecture and were readily reproducible. While delamination occurred at larger unit cell sizes, this had no effect on the overall shape or the structural integrity of the scaffolds.

The potential of this system lies in its ability to design and fabricate scaffolds with varying properties through the use of different unit cells and biomaterials to suit different tissue engineering applications.


Tissue Engineering Rapid Prototype Selective Laser Sinter Fuse Deposition Modeling Solid Freeform Fabrication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Thomson, R.C., et al. (2000). Polymer scaffold processing, in Principles of Tissue Engineering, R.P. Lanza, R. Langer, and J. Vacanti (eds), Academic Press: San Diego, pp. 251–262.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ingber, D.E. (2000). Mechanical and chemical determinants of tissue development, in Principles of Tissue Engineering, R.P. Lanzer, R. Langer, and J. Vacanti (eds), Academic Press: San Diego, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, E. (2000). Tissue engineering in perspective, in Principles of Tissue Engineering, R.P. Lanzer, R. Langer, and J. Vacanti (eds), Academic Press: San Diego.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Widmer, M.S. and A.G. Mikos (1998). Fabrication of biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering, in Frontiers in Tissue Engineering, C.W. Patrick, A.G. Mikos, and L.V. Mcintyre, (eds) Elsevier Sciences: New York, pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, S.F., et al. (2001). The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors. Tissue Engineering, 7(6), 679–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hutmacher, D.W. (2000). Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21(24), p. 2529–2543.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niklason, L.E. and R. Langer (2001). Prospects for organ and tissue replacement. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(5), 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niklason, L.E., et al. (1999). Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science, 284(5413), 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oberpenning, F., et al. (1999). De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnology, 17(2), 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chua, C.K., et al. (1998). An integrated experimental approach to link a laser digitiser, a CAD/CAM system and a rapid prototyping system for biomedical applications. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 14(2), 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chua, C.K., et al. (1998). Biomedical applications of rapid prototyping systems. Automedica, 17(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chua, C.K., et al. (1998). Rapid prototyping assisted surgery planning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 14(9), 624–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Low, F.H., et al. (1999). Prototyping of patellar components using morphometrical data, principal component analysis and CAD/CAE techniques. Automedica. 18(1): p. 27–45.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chua, C.K., et al. (2000). Fabricating facial prosthesis models using rapid prototyping tools. Integrated Manufacturing Systems - The International Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 11(1), 42–53.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy, R.A., et al. (1997). CT-generated porous hydroxyapatite orbital floor prosthesis as a prototype bioimplant. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 18(8), 1522–1525.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ono, I., et al. (1999). Treatment of large complex cranial bone defects by using hydroxyapatite ceramic implants. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 104(2), 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Curodeau, A., E. Sachs, and S. Caldarise (2000). Design and fabrication of cast orthopedic implants with freeform surface textures from 3-D printed ceramic shell. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 53(5), 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheah, C.M., et al. (2002). Characterization of microfeatures in selective laser sintered drug delivery devices. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 216(6), 369–383.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porter, N.L., R.M. Pilliar, and M.D. Grynpas (2001). Fabrication of porous calcium polyphosphate implants by solid freeform fabrication: A study of processing parameters and in vitro degradation characteristics. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 56(4), 504–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leong, K.F., C.M. Cheah, and C.K. Chua (2002). Building scaffolds with designed internal architectures for tissue engineering using rapid prototyping. Tissue Engineering, 8(6), 1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hollister, S.J., et al. (2000). An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 29(1), 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chu, T.M.G., et al. (2001). Hydroxyapatite implants with designed internal architecture. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, 12(6), 471–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hollister, S.J., et al. (2001). Design and manufacture of bone replacement scaffolds, in Bone Mechanics Handbook, S. Corwin, (ed.), CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feinberg, S.E., et al. (2001). Image-based biomimetic approach to reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs, 169(3), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chu, T.M.G., et al. (2002). Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures. Biomaterials, 23(5), 1283–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hollister, S.J., R.D. Maddox, and J.M. Taboas (2002). Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials, 23(20), 4095–4103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chua, C.K., et al. (2003). Development of a tissue engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 1: Investigation and classification. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(4), 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Temenoff, J.S., L. Lu, and A.G. Mikos (1999). Bone tissue engineering using synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffold, in Bone Engineering, J.E. Davies (ed.), Em Incoporated: Toronto.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen, G.P., T. Ushida, and T. Tateishi (2001). Development of biodegradable porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering C-Biomimetic and Supramolecular Systems, 17(1–2), 63–69.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hollister, S.J. (2005). Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials, 4(7), 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Agrawal, C.M. and R.B. Ray (2001). Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 55(2), 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mooney, D.J. and R.S. Langer (1995). Engineering biomaterials for tissue engineering, in The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, J.D. Bronzino (ed.), CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 109/1–109/8.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leong, K.F., C.M. Cheah, and C.K. Chua (2003). Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials, 24(13), 2363–2378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chua, C.K. and K.F. leong (2003). Rapid Prototyping: Principles and applications in manufacturing (2nd ed.), World Scientific: Singapore.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee, M., J.C.Y. Dunn, and B.M. Wu, (2005). Scaffold fabrication by indirect three-dimensional printing. Biomaterials, 26(20), 4281–4289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lam, C.X.F. (2002). In vitro degradation studies of customised PCL scaffolds fabricated via FDM, in ICBME. Singapore.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tan, K.H., et al., (2003). Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. Biomaterials, 24(18), 3115–3123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Limpanuphap, S. and B. Derby (2002). Manufacture of biomaterials by a novel printing process. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, 13(12), 1163–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sachlos, E., et al., (2003). Novel collagen scaffolds with predefined internal morphology made by solid freeform fabrication. Biomaterials, 24(8), 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phung, W.J. (2002). Investigation of building orthopaedic implantation models using Rapid Prototyping, in School of Mechanical & Production Engineering.Nanyang Technological University: Singapore.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tontowi, A.E. and T.H.C. Childs, (2001). Density prediction of crystalline polymer sintered parts at various powder bed temperatures. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 7(3), 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Childs, T.H.C. and A.E. Tontowi, (2001). Selective laser sintering of a crystalline and a glass-filled crystalline polymer: Experiments and simulations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215(11), 1481–1495.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ho, H.C.H., I. Gibson, and W.L. Cheung, (1999). Effects of energy density on morphology and properties of selective laser sintered polycarbonate. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 90, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liu, E., (2005). Development of customised biomaterial powder composite for Selective Laser Sintering, in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.Nanyang Technological University: Singapore.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nelson, J.C., (1993). Selective Laser Sintering: A Definition of the Process and an Empirical Sintering Model. UMI: Ann Arbor, Mich, pp. xvi, 231.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. W. Naing
    • 1
  • C. K. Chua
    • 1
  • K. F. Leong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations