Skip to main content

Girls and IT: New Times, New Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development
  • 1331 Accesses

Abstract

With computers and the Internet bringing changes to every aspect of our lives, it is time to re-examine gender issues in Information Technology (IT). Five focus groups involving female and male high school students, male and female high school teachers and female parents were organised during a 4-week period. Each group was asked questions about children's attitudes to IT and the experiences that affect these attitudes, particularly within the context of the school. The data were analysed to find common themes, which are reported in this paper. The common themes identified were (a) lack of computers is no longer an issue; (b) IT is no longer seen as a male-dominated domain; (c) old attitudes still exist, but things are changing; (d) the school, and particularly teachers, can influence students' attitudes to IT and (e) parents have considerable influence on students' positive and negative attitudes to IT. The paper concludes that attitudes to IT amongst males and females are changing and that schools and parents have an opportunity to reverse the trend of females away from IT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABS (2006) Household Use of Information Technology. ABS, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (1998) Gender Gaps: Where Schools still Fail our Children. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenz, B. W. and Lee, M. J. (1990) Gender Differences in the Attitude, Interest and Participation of Secondary Students in Computer Use. American Educational Research Association, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argy, P. (April/May 2007) Demand for ICT Professional Skills Reaches All-Time High. Information Age. 2–3 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, K., Maratro, R. C. and Ferris, S. P. (2007) Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation. Innovate. 4, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, P. and Baker, S. (2001) Girls and Technology in the Secondary School. Catholic Education Office of Western Australia, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. and Bradley, K. (2005) A Matter of Degrees: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross Nationally. In: J. M. Cohoon and W. C. Aspray(Eds.), Women and Information Technology: Research on the Reasons for Underrepresentation. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V. A. (1990) Sex Differences in Computer Participation: Concerns, Extent, Reasons and Strategies. Australian Journal of Education. 34, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V. A. (1992) Strategies for Involving Girls in Computer Science. In: C. D. Martin and E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds.), In Search of Gender Free Paradigms in Computer Science Education. International Society for Technology in Education, Oregon, pp. 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. B. (2002)Challenges of Information Technology Education in the 21st Century. Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B. (1985) Psychosocial Implications of Sex Differences in Attitudes Towards Computers: Results of a Survey. International Journal of Women's Studies. 8(3), 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, C. (2007) Computer Science Takes Steps to Bring Women to the Fold. New York Times .

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetler, M. (1985) Sex Differences on the California Statewide Assessment of Computer Literacy. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 13(3), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galpin, V. (2002) Women in Computing Around the World. SIGCSE Bulletin. 34(2), 94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin, S. (2000) Women, Minorities Could Fill More High-Tech Jobs. Network World. 17(29), 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goasduff, L. and Swedemyr, C. (2006) Gartner Advises IT Leaders to Recognise Complementary Gender Strengths. Cannes .

    Google Scholar 

  • Gressard, C. P. and Loyd, B. H. (1987) An Investigation of the Effects of Math Anxiety and Sex on Computer Attitude. School Science and Mathematics. 87(2), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, C. (2003) Dominant or Different? Gender Issues in Computer Supported Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 7(1), 14–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurer, D. and Camp, T. (2002) An ACM-W Literature Review on Women in Computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 34(2), 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, L. (1999) Is Technology Masculine? Theorising the Absence of Women. Technology and Society, 1999. International Symposium on Women and Technology: Historical, Societal, and Professional Perspectives. pp. 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurworth, R. (1996) Qualitative Methodology: Common Questions about Running Focus Groups during Evaluations. Evaluation News and Comment. 5(1), 48, 49, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas-Dwyer, D. and Pospisil, R. (2004) The Millennial Effect: Implications for Academic Development. HERDSA Conference, Sarawak, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekelis, L. S., Ancheta, R. W. and Heber, E. (2005) Hurdles in the Pipeline: Girls and Technology Careers. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 26, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, A. and Luff, D. (2001) Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health care: An Introduction to Qualitative Analysis. Trent Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (2005) Technology and Gender Equity: What Works? In: N. F.Russo (Eds.), Women in Science and Technology. American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1998) The Focus Group Guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, G. F. and Loyd, B. H. (1989) Gender and Attitudes Toward Computers and Calculators: Their Relationship to Math Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 5(2), 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. G. and Oblinger, J. L. (2005)Educating the Net Generation. Washington .

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. (2005) Gender and Technology: A Research Review. Center for Gender Equity. Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. S. (1985) Making the Computer Neuter. The Computing Teacher. 23 –27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. and McGinnis, M. (1988) Computer Equity for Girls. In: A. O. B. Carelli (Ed.),Sex Equity in Education: Readings and Strategies. Springfield , pp. 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M. (1997) Issues of Gender. In: Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview, Boulder, pp. 231–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shashaani, L. (1994) Socioeconomic Status, Parents' Sex-Role Stereotypes, and the Gender Gap in Computing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 26(4), 433–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1988) Computational Reticence: Why Women Fear the Intimate Machine. In: C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and Women's Voices. Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEEA Equity Resource Center (2000) Facts on Women's and Girl's Educational Equity. WEEA Equity Resource Center, Newton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2006) Content Analysis (Qualitative, Thematic).http://www.ils.unc.edu/~yanz/Content%20analysis.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2007

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Downes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Downes, S. (2009). Girls and IT: New Times, New Challenges. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Lang, M., Conboy, K., Barry, C. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30403-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68772-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics