Abstract
With computers and the Internet bringing changes to every aspect of our lives, it is time to re-examine gender issues in Information Technology (IT). Five focus groups involving female and male high school students, male and female high school teachers and female parents were organised during a 4-week period. Each group was asked questions about children's attitudes to IT and the experiences that affect these attitudes, particularly within the context of the school. The data were analysed to find common themes, which are reported in this paper. The common themes identified were (a) lack of computers is no longer an issue; (b) IT is no longer seen as a male-dominated domain; (c) old attitudes still exist, but things are changing; (d) the school, and particularly teachers, can influence students' attitudes to IT and (e) parents have considerable influence on students' positive and negative attitudes to IT. The paper concludes that attitudes to IT amongst males and females are changing and that schools and parents have an opportunity to reverse the trend of females away from IT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABS (2006) Household Use of Information Technology. ABS, Canberra.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (1998) Gender Gaps: Where Schools still Fail our Children. Washington.
Arenz, B. W. and Lee, M. J. (1990) Gender Differences in the Attitude, Interest and Participation of Secondary Students in Computer Use. American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Argy, P. (April/May 2007) Demand for ICT Professional Skills Reaches All-Time High. Information Age. 2–3 .
Barnes, K., Maratro, R. C. and Ferris, S. P. (2007) Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation. Innovate. 4, 2.
Carey, P. and Baker, S. (2001) Girls and Technology in the Secondary School. Catholic Education Office of Western Australia, Western Australia.
Charles, M. and Bradley, K. (2005) A Matter of Degrees: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross Nationally. In: J. M. Cohoon and W. C. Aspray(Eds.), Women and Information Technology: Research on the Reasons for Underrepresentation. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 183–204.
Clarke, V. A. (1990) Sex Differences in Computer Participation: Concerns, Extent, Reasons and Strategies. Australian Journal of Education. 34, 52–66.
Clarke, V. A. (1992) Strategies for Involving Girls in Computer Science. In: C. D. Martin and E. Murchie-Beyma (Eds.), In Search of Gender Free Paradigms in Computer Science Education. International Society for Technology in Education, Oregon, pp. 71–86.
Cohen, E. B. (2002)Challenges of Information Technology Education in the 21st Century. Idea Group.
Collis, B. (1985) Psychosocial Implications of Sex Differences in Attitudes Towards Computers: Results of a Survey. International Journal of Women's Studies. 8(3), 207–213.
Dean, C. (2007) Computer Science Takes Steps to Bring Women to the Fold. New York Times .
Fetler, M. (1985) Sex Differences on the California Statewide Assessment of Computer Literacy. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 13(3), 181–191.
Galpin, V. (2002) Women in Computing Around the World. SIGCSE Bulletin. 34(2), 94–100.
Gaudin, S. (2000) Women, Minorities Could Fill More High-Tech Jobs. Network World. 17(29), 6–16.
Glaser, B. G. (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, California.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York.
Goasduff, L. and Swedemyr, C. (2006) Gartner Advises IT Leaders to Recognise Complementary Gender Strengths. Cannes .
Gressard, C. P. and Loyd, B. H. (1987) An Investigation of the Effects of Math Anxiety and Sex on Computer Attitude. School Science and Mathematics. 87(2), 125–135.
Gunn, C. (2003) Dominant or Different? Gender Issues in Computer Supported Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 7(1), 14–30.
Gurer, D. and Camp, T. (2002) An ACM-W Literature Review on Women in Computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 34(2), 121–127.
Hodgkinson, L. (1999) Is Technology Masculine? Theorising the Absence of Women. Technology and Society, 1999. International Symposium on Women and Technology: Historical, Societal, and Professional Perspectives. pp. 121–126.
Hurworth, R. (1996) Qualitative Methodology: Common Questions about Running Focus Groups during Evaluations. Evaluation News and Comment. 5(1), 48, 49, 52.
Jonas-Dwyer, D. and Pospisil, R. (2004) The Millennial Effect: Implications for Academic Development. HERDSA Conference, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Kekelis, L. S., Ancheta, R. W. and Heber, E. (2005) Hurdles in the Pipeline: Girls and Technology Careers. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 26, 1.
Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Lacey, A. and Luff, D. (2001) Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health care: An Introduction to Qualitative Analysis. Trent Focus.
Linn, M. C. (2005) Technology and Gender Equity: What Works? In: N. F.Russo (Eds.), Women in Science and Technology. American Psychological Association, New York.
Morgan, D. L. (1998) The Focus Group Guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Munger, G. F. and Loyd, B. H. (1989) Gender and Attitudes Toward Computers and Calculators: Their Relationship to Math Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 5(2), 167–177.
Oblinger, D. G. and Oblinger, J. L. (2005)Educating the Net Generation. Washington .
Sanders, J. (2005) Gender and Technology: A Research Review. Center for Gender Equity. Seattle.
Sanders, J. S. (1985) Making the Computer Neuter. The Computing Teacher. 23 –27.
Sanders, J. and McGinnis, M. (1988) Computer Equity for Girls. In: A. O. B. Carelli (Ed.),Sex Equity in Education: Readings and Strategies. Springfield , pp. 157–172.
Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M. (1997) Issues of Gender. In: Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview, Boulder, pp. 231–318.
Shashaani, L. (1994) Socioeconomic Status, Parents' Sex-Role Stereotypes, and the Gender Gap in Computing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 26(4), 433–451.
Turkle, S. (1988) Computational Reticence: Why Women Fear the Intimate Machine. In: C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and Women's Voices. Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.
WEEA Equity Resource Center (2000) Facts on Women's and Girl's Educational Equity. WEEA Equity Resource Center, Newton, MA.
Zhang, Y. (2006) Content Analysis (Qualitative, Thematic).http://www.ils.unc.edu/~yanz/Content%20analysis.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Downes, S. (2009). Girls and IT: New Times, New Challenges. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Lang, M., Conboy, K., Barry, C. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30403-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68772-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)