Advertisement

Soft Systems Methodology: An Aid to Agile Development?

  • D. Bustard
  • F. Keenan
Chapter

Abstract

In principle, an agile approach to information systems development has the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the development process. One apparent disadvantage, however, is that agile methods tend to be strongly “product-focused”, meaning that they place greater emphasis on creating and modifying information systems than on understanding the context in which they are to be used. As a result, higher level requirements and issues can be less well understood. This paper argues for the use of more context analysis in agile development, while acknowledging that any extra effort required must be modest to stay within the general agile ethos. In particular, the paper considers the extent to which soft systems methodology might be a suitable way to perform such analysis. It is concluded that although this methodology is generally perceived as time-consuming, it is essentially sympathetic to the agile approach and is flexible enough to integrate with existing agile techniques.

Keywords

Soft System Methodology Rich Picture Agile Method Information System Development Agile Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken through the Centre for Software Process Technologies, which is supported by the EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland and the Border Region of Ireland (PEACE II).

References

  1. Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M. and Ronkainen, J. (2003) New directions on agile methods: A comparative analysis. In Proceedings of ICSE 2003, pp. 244–254.Google Scholar
  2. Ambler, S. (2003) Agile Database Techniques: Effective Strategies for the Agile Software Developer. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, K. (1999) Extreme Programming Explained. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, K. et al. (2001) Principles behind the Agile Manifesto. agilemanifesto.org/principles.html (last accessed on 14 April 2007).Google Scholar
  5. Bustard, D.W. and Keenan, F. (2005) Strategies for systems analysis: Groundwork for process tailoring. In Hinchey, M.et al. (eds), 12th IEEE international conference and workshops on the engineering of computer-based systems (ECBS '05), Greenbelt, Washington, USA, 4–7 April 2005. pp. 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Checkland, P. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Checkland, P. (1999) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (with 30-year retrospective). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. (2006) Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Conboy, K., Fitzgerald, B. and Golden, W. (2005) Agility in information systems development: A three-tiered framework. In Baskerville, R. (eds), Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion. IFIP TC8 WG 8.6 international working conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 8–11 May 2005. Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  10. Desouza, K.C. (ed) (2006) Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, I. (Summer 2006) Agile delivery at British Telecom. Methods and Tools, 20–27 .Google Scholar
  12. Gilb, T. (1988) Principles of Software Engineering Management. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassan, S., Bustard, D.W. and McSherry, D.M.G. (2006) Soft systems methodology in autonomic computing analysis. Systemist, 28(2), 106–115.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, M. (2004) Seeing more of the world. IEEE Software, 21(6), 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keenan, F. and Bustard, D.W. (Feb 2007) Enhancing Extreme Programming (XP) with environment analysis. Proceedings of software engineering, Innsbruck, Austria, Feb 2007. ACTA Press, Calgary, AB, Canada, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
  16. Larson, D. (2006) Agile alliance survey: Are we there yet?www.infoq.com/articles/agile-alliance-survey-2006 (last accessed on 14 April 2007).
  17. Lewis, P.J. (1992) Rich picture building in the soft systems methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(5), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathiassen, L. and Nielsen, P.A. (2000) Interaction and transformation in SSM. Systems Research and Behavioural Sciences, 17(3), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mingers, J. (2002) An idea ahead of its time: The history and development of soft systems methodology. Systemist, 24(2), 113–139.Google Scholar
  20. Mingers, J. and Taylor, S. (1992) The use of soft systems methodology in practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(4), 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Munro, I. and Mingers, J. (2002) The use of multimethodology in practice – Results of a survey of practitioners. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 369–378 .Google Scholar
  22. Stowell, F.A. (ed) (1995) Information Systems Provision: The Contributions of SSM. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, B. (1990) Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Wilson, B. (2001) Soft Systems Methodology: Conceptual Model Building and Its Contribution. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Bustard
  • F. Keenan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations