Advertisement

Sending Our Own Signals

  • Michael A. G. Michaud

Abstract

Some of those interested in searching for extraterrestrials have proposed that we initiate contact by sending our own signals, in the hope that another civilization will detect them and respond. Calling attention to ourselves by such signaling has been described as “active SETI,” in contrast to passive listening.

Keywords

Radio Telescope Passive Listening American Astronomer Arecibo Observatory Large Radio Telescope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Quoted in Frank White, The SETI Factor: How the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence is Changing Our View of the Universe and Ourselves, Walker, 1990, 17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crowe 205, 207, 394, 398–399; MacGowan and Ordway, 327-329; Drake and Sobel, 170–174; Walter Sullivan, We Are Not Alone (revised edition), New York, Plume, 1994, 158–159; Swift, 6; Grinspoon, 324. Douglas Vakoch reviewed this history in “Pictorial Messages to Extraterrestrials, Part 1,” SETIQuest, Vol. 4 (First Quarter 1998), 8–10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See W. Bernard Carlson, “Inventor of Dreams,” Scientific American, March 2005, 79–85. In 1931, Tesla told Time magazine about his plans to signal the stars with his “Teslascope”—a giant radio transmitter. Nothing seems to have come of this project.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frederick I. Ordway, III, Intelligence in the Universe, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1966 MacGowan and Ordway, 331.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vakoch, “Pictorial Messages to Extraterrestrials;” Carl Sagan and Frank Drake, “The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence,” Scientific American, May 1975, 80–89. Sagan, Drake, and Linda Salzman Sagan described the Pioneer plaques in “A Message From Earth,” Science, Vol. 175 (1972), 881, republished in Goldsmith, editor, 274–277. Also see Carl Sagan, Murmurs of Earth: The Voyager Interstellar Record, New York, Random House, 1978, and George Abell, “The Search for Life Beyond Earth: A Scientific Update,” in Christian, editor, 53–71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Staff at the Arecibo National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, “The Arecibo Message of November, 1974,” in Goldsmith, editor, 293–296; Paul Davies, Are We Alone?, 56; Carl Sagan, Cosmos, New York, Random House, 1980, 297; Drake and Sobel, 183; Stephen Webb, Where is Everybody? Fifty Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life, New York, Copernicus, 2002, 111.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donald Goldsmith, Voyage to the Milky Way: The Future of Space Exploration, New York, TV Books, 1999, 223.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simon LeVay, Here Be Dragons: The Scientifi c Quest for Extraterrestrial Life, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000 Koerner and LeVay, 174; Seth Shostak, Sharing the Universe: Perspectives on Extraterrestrial Life, Berkeley, CA, Berkeley Hills Books, 1998, 149–150. Also see Michael A.G. Michaud, “Ten Decisions that Could Shake the World,” Space Policy, Vol. 19 (May 2003), 131–136.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carl Sagan, “The Quest for Intelligent Life in Space Is Just Beginning,” Smithsonian, May 1978, 38–47; Ridpath, 130. In his 1973 book The Cosmic Connection (page 195), Sagan wrote that the Arecibo radio telescope could communicate with an identical copy of itself anywhere in our galaxy, implying a range of at least 70,000 light years. Seven years later, Sagan wrote in Cosmos (page 297) that the Arecibo observatory could communicate with an identical radio telescope 15,000 light years away, about 20% of the previous distance and only halfway to the center of the Milky Way. For Sagan’s change of view, see John Casti, Paradigms Lost: Tackling the Unanswered Mysteries of Modern Science, New York, Bard (Avon), 1989, 384.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Philip Morrison, et al., editors, SETI: The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, NASA SP-419, 1977, 14; Ekers, et al., 5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ekers, et al., eds, xxxi, 5, 235.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    White, 68; Morrison, et al., editors, 1977, 8, 14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frank Drake, “Methods of Communication,” in Cyril Ponnamperuma and A.G.W. Cameron, editors, Interstellar Communication: Scientific Perspectives, Boston, Houghton-Mifflin, 1974, 118–139.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ekers, et al., 5, 229.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frederick I. Ordway, III, Intelligence in the Universe, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1966 MacGowan and Ordway, 330, 355.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The quote is from Ekers, et al., 244. Also see Douglas A. Vakoch, “The Dialogic Model: Representing Human Diversity in Messages to Extraterrestrials,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 42 (1998), 705-710; Douglas A. Vakoch, “Message Policy for Active SETI,” paper presented at the International Conference on SETI in the 21st Century, Sydney, Australia, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frederick I. Ordway, III, Intelligence in the Universe, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1966 MacGowan and Ordway, 330.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vakoch, “The Dialogic Model,” 709.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Team Encounter website (www.teamencounter.com), September 2003; Lamb, 33.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michaud, “Ten Decisions”; Ekers, 244; David Brin, “A Contrarian Perspective on Altruism: The Dangers of First Contact,” 30 September 2002, available at www.davidbrin.com.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. G. Michaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations