What Is Missing

  • Michael A. G. Michaud


Astronomers and others who have speculated about the consequences of indirect contact have enjoyed considerable exposure in academic and popular nonfiction literature. The alternative point of view is poorly represented outside science fiction; we lack comparable nonfiction studies of direct contact with extraterrestrial civilizations. It is time to correct this imbalance, drawing on thoughtful speculation as well as on research findings.


Social Science Research Star Trek Alien Civilization Alien Behavior Considerable Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Project Cyclops, 32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morrison, et al., editors, 8; “Should Mankind Hide?” The New York Times, 22 November 1976, republished in Goldsmith, editor, 269.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brin, “A Contrarian Perspective;” Burke-Ward, “Possible Existence of Extra-Terrestrial Technology in the Solar System;” MacVey, Interstellar Travel, 226.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivan Almar and Jill Tarter, “The Discovery of ETI as a High-Consequence, Low-Probability Event,” paper presented at the 2000 International Astronautical Congress (IAA-00-IAA.9.2.01); Seth Shostak and Ivan Almar, “The Rio Scale Applied to Fictional SETI Detections,” paper presented at the 2002 World Space Congress (IAC-02-IAA.9.1.06).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    von Hoerner, in Hart and Zuckerman, editors, 29.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leonardo Maugeri cited this theorem in his article “Oil: Never Cry Wolf—Why the Petroleum Age Is Far From Over,” Science, Vol. 304 (21 May 2004), 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    Dole and Asimov, 197.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Robert Freitas, “Metalaw and Interstellar Relations,” Mercury, March–April 1977, 15–17.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    D.T. Michael, Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    MacGowan and Ordway, 261, 377.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Black, et al., 1977; David C. Black and Mark A. Stull, “The Science of SETI,” in Morrison, et al., editors, 95–100.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Ben Finney, “SETI and the Two Terrestrial Cultures,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 26 (1992), 263–265; Finney, quoted in Douglas A. Vakoch, “The Dialogic Model,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 42 (1998), 705–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    Grinspoon, 257; Sivier, “SETI and the Historian.”Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    John Billingham, Scientific and Cultural Aspects of SETI, paper prepared as background material for a meeting of the International Academy of Astronautics SETI Committee in 1994 (the meeting was canceled).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Billingham, et al., editors, Social Implications, 80–81.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Ekers, et al., 236; Dick and Strick, 222.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Harrison, et al., “The Role of the Social Sciences in SETI,” in Tough, editor, 71–85.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Melvin Konner, “Why We Did It” (review of Michael Cook’s A Brief History of the Human Race), Nature, Vol. 428 (11 March 2004), 123–124; Cohen, “History and the Hyperpower”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 21.
    Paolo Musso, “Philosophical and Religious Implications;” Joseph N. Tatarewicz, review of Dick’s The Biological Universe,” Science, Vol. 275 (21 March 1997), 1748–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 22.
    Freeman, The Closing of the Western Mind, xvi.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Crowe, 559.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Sagan and Newman in Regis, editor, 161.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. G. Michaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations