Effective Limiting Surfaces in the Theory of Nonlinear Composites

In contrast to the extensive work on the elastic behavior of composites, only a limited number of studies for the nonlinear range have been published (for references see [299], [897]). Standard methods of successive approximation may be used in nonlinear problems of composites with random structure, linearized problems being solved at each stage. The well-known concept of secant moduli has been combined with the hypothesis of the homogeneity of the increments of the plastic or creep strains [80], [161], [162], [247], [298], [1075], [1146]. Since the widely used method of average strains is capable of estimating only the average stresses in the components, its use for the linearization of functions describing nonlinear effects, e.g., strength ([19], [930]), yielding [687], damage accumulation ([390], [596]; see also the theories combining the damage accumulation and life-fraction rule [150], [1042]), hardening [910], creep [1229], and dynamic viscoplasticity [1231] may be problematical. Due to the significant inhomogeneity of the stress fields in the components (especially in the matrix), such linearization entails physical inconsistencies, which was discussed in detail in [164], [180] within the context of predicting the flow behavior of porous media. Alternatively, for linearizing nonlinear functions (such as the yield or strength criterion, dissipative function) physically consistent assumptions for the dependence of these functions on the second moment of stresses are employed.


Energy Release Rate Yield Surface Fracture Probability Interface Stress Integral Equation Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Personalised recommendations