Skip to main content

The Survivorship Care Plan: What, Why, How, and for Whom

  • Chapter
Book cover Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

This chapter highlights the recent call by the Institute of Medicine for the use of a cancer survivorship plan to be provided to patients and their primary care providers at the end of cancer treatment. The need for evidence-based guidance on surveillance regimens after cancer treatment, how best to communicate what cancer treatments were received, and what care should be provided after treatment, as well as mechanisms to share care between oncology specialists and primary care providers is discussed. With the expanding number of cancer survivors each year, oncologists must find creative ways to ensure that the gains obtained through successful cancer treatment are not lost when patients transition to this phase of their care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer survivorship—United States, 1971–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;53:526–529.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz N, Rowland JH, et al. Riding the creast of the teachable moment: Promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5418–5430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganz PA. A Teachable Moment for Oncologists: Cancer Survivors, 10 Million Strong and Growing! J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5458–5460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Desch CE, Benson AB, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8512–8519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Impac tof follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. JAMA. 1994;271:1587–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muss HB, Tell GS, Case LD, et al. Perceptions of follow-up care in women with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 1991;14:55–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson FE. Overview. In: Johnson FE, Virgo KS (eds). Cancer Patient Follow-Up. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997;4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. NIH consensus conference. Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. JAMA. 1995;273:491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumor Adjuvant Therapy Group. Expectancy or primary chemotherapy in patients with advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:904–911.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fong Y, Cohen AM, Fortner JG, et al. Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:938–946.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Northover JM, Houghton J, Lennon T. CEA to detect recurrences of colon cancer (letter). JAMA. 1994;272:31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H, et al. Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no followup. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1995;38:619–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Makela JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI. Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Archives of Surgery. 1995;130:1062–1067.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C, et al. A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:666–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L, et al. Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R, et al. Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: A prospective, randomized study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1998;41:1127–1133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D, et al. Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:418–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen M, Chan L, Beart RWJ, et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1998;41:1116–1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, et al. Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2002;324:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weeks JC, Yeap BY, Canellos GP, et al. Value of follow-up procedures in patients with large-cell lymphoma who achieve a complete remission. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1196–1203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffrey GM, Hickey BE, Hider P. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 3: Oxford-Update Software, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J, et al. Follow-up of patients with “curatively resected” colorectal cancer: A practice guideline. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loprinzi CL, Hayes D, Smith T. Doc, shouldn’t we be getting some tests? J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2345–2348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ben-Josef E, Lawrence TS. Radiotherapy for unresectable hepatic malignancies. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:273–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC, Vree R, et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: Quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:914–920.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, et al. Routine follow-up of breast cancer in primary care: Randomised trial. BMJ. 1996;313:665–669.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kjeldsen BJ, Thorsen H, Whalley D, et al. Influence of follow-up on health-related quality of life after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:509–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lampic C, Wennberg A, Schill JE, et al. Anxiety and cancer-related worry of cancer patients at routine follow-up visits. Acta Oncol. 1994;33:119–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Woodwell DA, Cherry DK. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 Summary. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, No. 346. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beasley JW, Hankey TH, Erickson R, et al. How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:405–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: A model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:166–171.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Earle, C.C., Schrag, D., Woolf, S.H., Ganz, P.A. (2007). The Survivorship Care Plan: What, Why, How, and for Whom. In: Ganz, P.A. (eds) Cancer Survivorship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68265-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68265-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-34349-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68265-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics