Advertisement

Future Research Directions in Supply Chain Configuration Problem

Abstract

As in the case of any open and adaptive system, the structure of supply chain has evolved progressively over time from a sequential supply chain, to a global supply chain, a supply network, and alliance networks, respectively. This evolution has reflected the change in business environment from static to dynamic. In Chapters 1 and 2, we discussed such supply chain configuration phenomenon and shed light on its sources and causes. It was also observed that various components of supply chain have a significant impact on its structure. So what does the future hold for the supply chain configuration problem? To answer this question, we review the anatomy of a supply chain from the perspective of trends and opportunities and their impact on its structure. Then, we propose an agenda for future research in supply chain configuration, which takes into account the confluence of interdisciplinary research and the increasing use of emerging technologies.

Keywords

Supply Chain Mass Customization Supply Chain Network Global Supply Chain Alliance Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agogino A, Chidambaram B (1997) Function-Costing Applied to Brushless D.C. Permanent Magnet Motors. Proc. of 1997 ASME Design AutomationGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandra C, Grabis J. (2004) Managing Logistics for Mass Customization: The New Production Frontier. Chandra C, Kamrani A (eds.) Mass Customization: Supply Chain Approach. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp.89–119Google Scholar
  3. Cheshirehenbury (2006) Next Generation Manufacturing Enterprise Model. http://www.cheshirehenbury.com/manufacturing2020/Google Scholar
  4. Gregory M (2000) Foresight Manufacturing 2020. Proceedings of International Manufacturing Foresight Conference, Cambridge, UK, March 12–14Google Scholar
  5. National Research Council (1998), (NRC). Visionary Manufacturing Challenges for 2020. Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges, National Research Council, Published by: National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (2001) The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 4Google Scholar
  7. Ramani K, Cunningham R, Devanathan S, Subramaniam J, Patwardhan H (2004) Technology Review of Mass Customization. International Conference on Economic, Technical and Organisational aspects of Product Configuration Systems, June 28–29, http://www.productmodels.org/conference2004/Google Scholar
  8. Stewart G (1997) Supply-chain operations reference model (SCOR): the first cross-industry framework for integrated supply-chain management. Logistics Information Management 10:62–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Personalised recommendations