Hybrid Approaches


Mathematical programming and simulation are the main modeling approaches used for supply chain configuration. Previous chapters dedicated to discussing these approaches have identified both their strengths and weaknesses. Obviously, a modeling approach capitalizing on the strengths while avoiding the weaknesses is desirable for a comprehensive evaluation of supply chain configuration. Hybrid models combining optimization and simulation models have long been identified as an opportunity to exploit the benefits of different modeling techniques. This approach has been strengthened by the increasing computational power available to decision-makers.


Supply Chain Optimization Model Manufacturing Cost Supplier Selection Mathematical Programming Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Byrne MD, Bakir MA (1999) Production planning using a hybrid simulation-analytical approach. International Journal of Production Economics 59:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carson Y, Maria A (1997) Simulation optimization: Methods and applications. Andradóttir S, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 1997 of the Winter Simulation Conference. Atlanta, pp 118–126Google Scholar
  3. Chandra C, Grabis J (2005) Multi-objective supplier selection using simulated cost estimates, Proceedings of European Modeling and Simulation Symposium, EMSS’ 2005, pp.143–150Google Scholar
  4. Chandra C, Everson M, Grabis J (2005) Evaluation of enterprise-level benefits of manufacturing flexibility. Omega 33:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gnoni MG, Iavagnilio R, Mossa G, Mummolo G, Di Leva A (2003) Production planning of a multi-site manufacturing system by hybrid modelling: A case study from the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics 85:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ingalls RG (1998) The value of simulation in modeling supply chains. D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson and M. S. Manivannan (eds) Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington DC, pp 1371–1375Google Scholar
  7. Kim B, Kim S (2001) Extended model for a hybrid production planning approach. International Journal of Production Economics 73:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kleijnen JPC (2005) An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 164:287–300MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Law AM, Kelton WD (2000) Simulation Modeling and Analysis. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee YH, Kim SH, Moon C (2002) Production-distribution planning in supply chain using a hybrid approach. Production Planning & Control 13:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nolan RL, Sovereign MG (1972) A recursive optimization and simulation approach to analysis with an application to transportation systems. Management Science 18:676–690Google Scholar
  12. Shanthikumar JG, Sargent RG (1983) A Unifying View of Hybrid Simulation/ Analytic Models and Modeling. Operations Research 31:1030–1052MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2003) Designing and managing the supply chain. New York: McGraw-Hill/IrwinGoogle Scholar
  14. Weber CA, Current JR (1993) A multi-objective approach to vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research 68:173–84MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weber CA, Current J, Desai A (2000) An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Management 5:90–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Personalised recommendations