Advertisement

Surgery pp 1457-1468 | Cite as

Vascular Access for Dialysis, Chemotherapy, and Nutritional Support

  • R. Randal Bollinger
  • Stuart J. Knechtle

Abstract

The success of many modern medical therapies is intimately tied to the success of vascular access. Hemodialysis for renal failure, chemotherapy for cancer, hyperalimentation for nutritional support, plasmapheresis for autoimmune disease, central pressure monitoring for the patient in intensive care, and blood replacement for the trauma victim are examples of therapies that depend on effective and reliable vascular access. The importance of angioaccess is so great that entire monographs have been written on vascular access in general,1 catheter access to the central veins,2 and vascular access specifically for dialysis,3 chemotherapy,4 and nutritional support.5 The evolution of vascular access has a long and interesting but somewhat disjointed history.

Keywords

Vascular Access Cephalic Vein Dialysis Catheter Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Versus Fistula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson SE. Vascular Access: Principles and Practice, 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ray CE Jr. Central Venous Access. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sommer BG, Henry ML. Vascular Access for Hemodialysis. Los Angeles: Pluribus Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alexander HR. Vascular Access in the Cancer Patient: Devices, Insertion Techniques, Maintenance, and Prevention and Management of Complications. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters JL. A Manual of Central Venous Catheterization and Parenteral Nutrition. Bristol: John Wright and Sons, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wren C. An account of the rise and attempts, of a way to conveigh liquors immediately into the mass of the blood. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1665;1:128–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dudrick S, Rhoads J. New horizons for intravenous feeding. JAMA 1971;215(6):939–949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lower R. The method observed in transfusing the blood out of one animal into another. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1666;1:353–358.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lower R. An account of the experiment of transfusion practised upon man in London. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1667;2:557–559.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lower R. Tractatus de Corde. In: Franklin KJ, ed. Early Science in Oxford, 1932 ed. London: Oxford Press, 1667.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Denis J. A letter concerning a new way of curing sundry diseases by transfusion of blood. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1667;2:489–504.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cournand A. Cardiac catheterization. Development of the technique, its contributions to experimental medicine, and its initial application in man. Acta Med Scand 1975;(suppl):7–32.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolff W. The first clinical experience with the artificial kidney. Ann Intern Med 1965;62(3):608–619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quinton W, Dillard D, Scribner B. Cannulation of blood vessels for prolonged hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1960;6:104–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brescia M, Cimino J, Appel K, Hurwich B. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 1966;275(20):1089–1092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas G. A large-vessel applique A–V shunt for hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1969;15:288–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dudrick S, Wilmore D, Vars H, Rhoads J. Can intravenous feeding as the sole means of nutrition support growth in the child and restore weight loss in an adult? An affirmative answer. Ann Surg 1969;169(6):974–984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Broviac J, Cole J, Scribner B. A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136(4):602–606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hickman R, Buckner C, Clift R, Sanders J, Stewart P, Thomas E. A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obst 1979;148(6):871–875.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niederhuber J, Ensminger W, Gyves J, Lipeman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;92:706–712.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Team-based prevention of catheter-related infections [comment]. N Engl J Med 2006;355(26):2781–2783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sidawy A, Gray R, Besarab A, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses. J Vasc Surg 2002;35(3):603–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roy-Chaudhury P, Kelly B, Melhem M, et al. Vascular access in hemodialysis: Issues, management and emerging concepts. Cardiol Clin 2005;23(3):249–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Valentino L, Ewenstein B, Navikis R, Wilkes M. Central venous access devices for haemophilia. Haemophilia 2004;10(2):134–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khwaja K. Dialysis access procedures. In: Humar A, Matas A, Payne W, eds. Atlas of Organ Transplantation. London: Springer, 2006:35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thadhani R, Pascual M, Bonventre J. Acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1448–1460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manns M, Sigler M, Techan B. Continuous renal replacement therapies: an update. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32:185–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tesio F, Baz HD, Panarello G, et al. Double catheterization of the internal jugular vein for hemodialysis: indications, techniques, and clinical results. Artif Organs 1994;18(4):301–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sandhu J. Dialysis ports: a new totally implantable option for hemodialysis access. Tech Vasc Intervent Radiol 2002;5(2):108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McLaughlin K, Jones B, Mactier R, Porteus C. Long-term vascular access for hemodialysis using silicon dual-lumen catheters with guidewire replacement of catheters for technique salvage. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;29(4):553–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mosquera DA, Gibson SP, Goldman MD. Vascular access surgery: a 2-year study and comparison with the Permcath. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1992;7(11):1111–1115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Williams R, Hollander L, Benyon R, et al. Principles of vascular access surgery. In: Wilson S, Veith F, Hobson R, Williams R, eds. Vascular Surgery: Principles and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987:857–872.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mehta S. Statistical summary of clinical results of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis. In: Sommer B, Henry M, eds. Vascular Access for Hemodialysis, vol II. Los Angeles: WL Gore Associates and Precept Press, 1991:145–157.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marx A, Landmann J, Harder F. Surgery for vascular access. Curr Probl Surg 1990;27:1–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Choi H, Lai B, Cerveira J, et al. Durability and cumulative functional patency of transposed and nontransposed arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg 2003;38(6):1206–2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37(1 suppl 1):S137–S181.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gorski T, Nguyen H, Gorski Y, Chung H, Jamal A, Muney J. Lower-extremity saphenous vein transposition arteriovenous fistula: an alternative for hemodialysis access in AIDS patients. Am Surg 1998;64:338–340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    National Kidney Foundation. NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access. National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30(4 suppl 3):S150–S191.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Silva M Jr, Hopson R, Pappas P, et al. A strategy for increasing use of autogenous hemodialysis access procedures: impact of preoperative, noninvasive evaluation. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:302–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Allon M, Robbin M. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: Problems and solutions. Kidney Int 2002;62:1109–1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Parmley M, Broughan T, Jennings W. Vascular ultrasonography prior to dialysis access surgery. Am J Surg 2002;184:568–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Katzman HE, Glickman MH, Schild AF, Fujitani RM, Lawson JH. Multicenter evaluation of the bovine mesenteric vein bio-prosthesis for hemodialysis access in patients with an earlier failed prosthetic graft. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201(2):223–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taylor S, Eaves G, Weatherford D. Results and complications of arteriovenous access dialysis grafts in the lower extremity: a five-year review. Am Surg 1996;62:188–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mandel S, McDougal E. Popliteal artery to saphenous vein vascular access for hemodialysis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;160:358–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Connolly J, Brownell D, Levine E, et al. Complications of renal dialysis access procedures. Arch Surg 1984;119:1325–1328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tashjian D, Lipkowitz G, Madden R, et al. Safety and efficacy of femoral-based hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg 2002;35(4):691–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Striker G, Tenckoff H. A transcutaneous prosthesis for prolonged access to the peritoneal cavity. Surgery (St. Louis) 1971;69(1):70–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    USRDS. 1997 Annual Report. In: US Renal Data System Annual Report. Bethesda, MD: The National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, 1997.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nolph K. Comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1988;24(suppl):S123–S131.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Crabtree J, Fishman A. A laparoscopic method for optimal peritoneal dialysis access. Am Surg 2005;71(2):135–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nielsen P, Hemmingsen C, Friis S, Ladefoged J, Olgaard K. Comparison of straight and curled Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters implanted by percutaneous technique: a prospective, randomized study. Perit Dial Int 1995;15(1):18–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diaz-Buxo J. Complications of peritoneal dialysis catheters: early and late. Int J Artif Organs 2006;29(1):50–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Alexander H. Insertion technique for long-term venous access catheters: percutaneous subclavian vein catheterization. In: Alexander H, ed. Vascular Access in the Cancer Patient. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:37–55.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Steinhaus E. Long-term access via internal jugular vein cutdown. In: Alexander H, ed. Vascular Access in the Cancer Patient. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:57–66.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vesely T. Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2003;14(5):527–534.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Torosian M. Difficult vascular access: alternate sites and techniques of insertion. In: Alexander H, ed. Vascular Access for the Cancer Patient. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:67–88.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brown J. Peripherally inserted central catheters: use in home care. J Intraven Nurs 1989;12:144–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Alexander H, Lucas A. Long-term venous access catheters and implantable ports. In: Alexander H, ed. Vascular Access in the Cancer Patient: Devices, Insertion Techniques, Maintenance and Prevention and Management of Complications. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:2–16.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Malviya V, Deppe G, Gove N, Malone JJ. Vascular access in gynecologic cancer using the Groshong right atrial catheter. Gynecol Cancer 1989;33(3):313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Strum S, McDermid J, Korn A, Joseph C. Improved methods for venous access: the Port-A-Cath, a totally implanted catheter system. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:596–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Vesely T. Air embolism during insertion of central venous catheters. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2001;12(11):1291–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Whitman E. Complications associated with the use of central venous access devices. Curr Probl Surg 1996;33:309–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Denys B, Uretsky B, Reddy P. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation 1993;87:1557–1562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Savader S, Haikal L, Karen O, Porter D, Oteham A. Hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths: treatment with a low-dose rtPA infusion. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2000;11:1131–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gray R, Levitin A, Buck D, et al. Percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion for malfunctioning well-positioned tunneled central venous dialysis catheters: a prospective, randomized trial. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2000;11(9):1121–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lumsden A, McDonald M, Isiklar H, et al. Central venous stenosis in the hemodialysis patient: incidence and efficacy of endovascular treatment. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:504–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vesely T, Hovsepian D, Pilgram T. Upper extremity central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients: treatment with Wallstents. Radiology 1997;204:343–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Stevenson KB, Hannah EL, Lowder CA, et al. Epidemiology of hemodialysis vascular access infections from longitudinal infection surveillance data: predicting the impact of NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(3):549–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Marr K, Sexton D, Conlon P, et al. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med 1997;125:275–280.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Early T, Gregory R, Wheeler J, Snyder S, Gayle R. Increased infection rate in double-lumen versus single-lumen Hickman catheters in cancer patients. South Med J 1990;83:34–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Merrer J, Dejonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286(6):700–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bethard G. Management of bacteremia associated with tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:1045–1049.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Darouiche R, Raad I, Heard S, et al. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rupp M, Lisco S, Lipsett P, et al. Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central-catheter-related infections: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(8):570–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    NNIS System. NNIS Report, data summary from January 1992 through October 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mermel L. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:391–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355(26):2725–2732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Haimov M, Baez A, Neff M, et al. Complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Arch Surg 1975;110:708–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Anderson C, Allen B, Sicard G. Physiology and hemodynamics of vascular access. In: Sommer B, Henry M, eds. Vascular Access for Hemodialysis. Los Angeles: WL Gore and Associates and Pluribus Press, 1989:17–31.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Katz S, Kohl R. The treatment of hand ischemia by arterial ligation and upper extremity bypass after angioacess surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:239–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ryan S, Calligaro K, Dougherty M. Management of hemodialysis access infections. Semin Vasc Surg 2004;17(1):40–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Nasser G, Ayus J. Infectious complications of the hemodialysis access. Kidney Int 2001;60:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Brock J, Sussman M, Wamsley M, et al. The influence of human immunodeficiency virus infection and intravenous drug abuse on complications of hemodialysis access surgery. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:904–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Nannery W, Stoldt H, Fares LG Jr, et al. Hemodialysis access operations performed upon patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:387–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    O’Shea S, Lawson J, Reddan D, Murphy M, Ortel T. Hypercoagulable states and antithrombotic strategies in recurrent vascular access site thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2003;38(3):541–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Barth K, Gosnell M, Palestrant A, et al. Hydrodynamic thrombectomy system versus pulse-spray thrombolysis for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: a multicenter prospective randomized comparison. Radiology 2000;217(3):678–684.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Vesely T. Mechanical thrombectomy devices to treat thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Tech Vasc Intervent Radiol 20036(1):35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Vesely T, Siegel J. Use of the peripheral cutting balloon to treat hemodialysis-related stenosis. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2005;16(12):1593–1603.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Etheridge E, Haid S, Maesner M, et al. Salvage operations for malfunctioning polytetrafluoroethylene hemodialysis access grafts. Surgery (St. Louis) 1983;96:464–470.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Bethard G. Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. Kidney Int 1992;42:1390–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Schwab S, Raymond J, Saeed M, Newman G, Dennis P, Bollinger R. Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis. Early detection of venous stenosis. Kidney Int 1989;36:707–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Konner K. Interventional strategies for haemodialysis fistulae and grafts: interventional radiology or surgery? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15:1922–1923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Green L, Lee D, Kucey D. A metaanalysis comparing surgical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for thrombosed dialysis grafts. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:939–945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kolakowski S, Dougherty M, Calligaro K. Salvaging prosthetic dialysis fistulas with stents: forearm versus upper arm grafts. J Vasc Surg 2003;38(4):719–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Stanislav GV, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Malliard J, Johnson S, Feole J. Reliability of implanted central venous access devices in patients with cancer. Arch Surg 1987;122:1280–1283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Schuman E, Standage B, Ragsdale J, Gross G. Reinforced versus nonreinforced polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis access. Am J Surg 1997;173(5):407–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kennedy M, Quinton H, Bubolz T, Wennberg J, Wilson S. An analysis of the patency of vascular access grafts for hemodialysis using the Medicare Part B database. Semin Vasc Surg 1996;9(3):262–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Brooks J, Sigley R, May K, Mack R. Transluminal angioplasty versus surgical repair for stenosis of hemodialysis grafts. Am J Surg 1987;153:530–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Schuman E, Quinn S, Standage B, Cross G. Thombolysis versus thrombectomy for occluded hemodialysis grafts. Am J Surg 1994;167(5):473–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Schwartz C, McBrayer C, Sloan J, Menesis P, Ennis W. Thrombosed dialysis grafts: comparison of treatment with transluminal angioplasty and surgical revision. Radiology 1995;194(2):337–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Uflacker R, Rajagopalan P, Vujic I, Stutley J. Treatment of thrombosed dialysis access grafts: randomized trial of surgical thrombectomy versus mechanical thrombectomy with the Amplatz device. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1996;7(2):185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Vesely T, Idso M, Audrain J, Windus D, Lowell J. Thrombolysis versus surgical thrombectomy for the treatment of dialysis graft thrombosis: pilot study comparing costs. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1996;7(4):507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Marston W, Criado E, Jaques P, Mauro M, Burnham S, Keagy B. Prospective randomized comparison of surgical versus endovascular management of thrombosed dialysis access grafts. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:373–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Dougherty M, Calligaro K, Schindler N, Raviola C, Ntoso A. Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1999;30(6):1016–1023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Vesely T, Williams D, Weiss M, et al. Comparison of the Angiojet rheolytic catheter to surgical thrombectomy for the treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1999;10(9):1195–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Lombardi J, Dougherty M, Veitia N, Somal J, Calligaro K. A comparison of patch angioplasty and stenting for axillary venous stenoses of thrombosed hemodialysis grafts. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;36(3):223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Uflacker R, Rajagopolan P, Selby J, Hannegan C. Thrombosed dialysis access grafts: randomized comparison of the Amplatz thrombectomy device and surgical thromboembolectomy. Eur Radiol 2004;14(11):2009–2014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Randal Bollinger
    • 1
  • Stuart J. Knechtle
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Surgery and ImmunologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Transplantation and SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin Medical SchoolMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations