Advertisement

Surgery pp 2355-2371 | Cite as

Robot-Assisted Surgery: Technology and Current Clinical Status

  • Russell K. Woo
  • David A. Peterson
  • David Le
  • Michael E. Gertner
  • Thomas Krummel

Abstract

Since their commercial introduction in the early 1990s, robotic telemanipulator surgical systems have been increasingly used to facilitate complex minimal access surgical procedures. In the field of general surgery, such systems have been used to perform a wide variety of operations including foregut procedures, colon resections, and bariatric operations. In addition, these systems have seen significant use in several surgical subspecialties including urology, cardiothoracic surgery, and pediatric surgery. With improvements in robotic instrumentation and technology, interest and experience with robotic surgery has grown. This chapter reviews the current experience with robotic surgical systems in general surgery, highlighting the origins, current state, and future directions of robotic surgery.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgical System Heller Myotomy Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Robotic Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Diodato MD Jr, Prosad SM, Klingensmith ME, Damiano RJ Jr. Robotics in surgery. Curr Probl Surg 2004;41(9):752–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dharia SP, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril 2005;84(1):1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 2004;188(4A suppl):2S–15S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allaf M, Patriciu A, Mazilu D, Kavoussi L, Stoianovici D. Overview and fundamentals of urologic robot-integrated systems. Urol Clin N Am 2004;31(4):671–682, vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adler JR Jr, Chang SD, Murphy MJ, Doty J, Geis P, Hancock SL. The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1997;69(1–4):124–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuo JS, Yu C, Petrovich Z, Apuzzo ML. The CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery system: description, installation, and an initial evaluation of use and functionality. Neurosurgery 2003;53(5):1235–1239; discussion 1239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kasalicky MA, Svab J, Fried M, Melechovsky D. AESOP 3000—computer-assisted surgery, personal experience. Rozhl Chir 2002;81(7):346–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arezzo A, Testa T, Ulmer F, Schurr MO, Degregori M, Buess GF. Positioning systems for endoscopic solo surgery. Minerva Chir 2000;55(9):635–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 1998;13(10):2748–2750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okada S, Tanaba Y, Yaegashi S, et al. Initial use of the newly developed voice-controlled robot system for a solitary pulmonary arterio-venous malformation. Kyobu Geka 2002;55(10):871–875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee BR, Chow GK, Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: outcomes equivalent to open surgery. J Endourol 2000;14(10):811–819; discussion 819–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luebbe B, Woo R, Wolf S, Irish M. Robotically assisted minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric population: initial experience, technical considerations, and description of the da Vinci Surgical System. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 2003;7(4):385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2(3):199–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hollands CM, Dixey LN. Applications of robotic surgery in pediatric patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12(1):71–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1998;12(8):1091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, Buchler MW. Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91(11):1390–1397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic gastrointestinal surgery: phase 2—safety and efficacy. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1054–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ruurda JP, Visser PL, Broeders IA. Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comput Aided Surg 2003;8(1):24–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hourmont K, Chung W, Pereira S, Wasielewski A, Davies R, Ballantyne GH. Robotic versus telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: duration of surgery and outcomes. Surg Clin N Am 2003;83(6):1445–1462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nio D, Bemelman WA, Busch OR, Vrouenraets BC, Gouma DJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2004;18(3):379–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, et al. Clinical characteristics of remote Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 40 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12(16):2606–2609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kornprat P, Werkgartner G, Cerwenka H, et al. Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006;391(3):216–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ruurda JP, Draaisma WA, van Hillegersberg R, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a four-year single-center experience. Dig Surg 2005;22(5):313–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, et al. Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2001;15(9):918–923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakadi IE, Melot C, Closset J, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg 2006;30(6):1050–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Scheffer RC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. Nov 2006;93(11):1351–1359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45(12):1689–1694; discussion 1695–1686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Pigazzi A, Wasielewski A. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: lateral to medial or medial to lateral dissection? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16(6):406–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(12):1633–1639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(12):2162–2168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anvari M, Birch DW, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004;14(6):311–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Wolf RK, Michler RE, Ellison EC. Computer-assisted robotic Heller myotomy: initial case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11(4):251–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, et al. Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9(8):1020–1029; discussion 1029–1030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moser F, Horgan S. Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J Surg 2004;188(4A suppl):38S–44S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F. The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg 1999;9(2):206–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Curet MJ. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arch Surg 2005;140(8):779–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005;1(6):549–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51(3):648–657; discussion 657–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin N Am 2004;31(4):701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92(3):205–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 2004;63(5):819–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006;67(2):360–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rocco B, Djavan B. Robotic prostatectomy: facts or fiction? Lancet 2007;369(9563):723–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Autschback R. Computer-enhanced coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117(6):1212–1214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Falk V, Fann JI, Grunenfelder J, Daunt D, Burdon TA. Endoscopic computer-enhanced beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70(6):2029–2033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d’Attellis N, et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118(1):4–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kappert U, Cichon R, Gulielmos V, et al. Robotic-enhanced Dresden technique for minimally invasive bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3(4):319–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17(1):38–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al. Computer-enhanced “robotic” cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121(5):842–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kappert U, Cichon R, Schneider J, et al. Technique of closed chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20(4):765–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kappert U, Schneider J, Cichon R, et al. Development of robotic enhanced endoscopic surgery for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2001;104(12 suppl 1):I102–I107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Aupecle B, et al. Computer assisted open heart surgery. First case operated on with success. C R Acad Sci HI 1998;321(5):437–442.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Elbeery JE, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da Vinci surgical system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120(6):1171–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75(2):438–442; discussion 443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129(6):1395–1404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kypson AP. Recent trends in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Cardiology 2007;107(3):147–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mair H, Jansens JL, Lattouf OM, Reichart B, Dabritz S. Epicardial lead implantation techniques for biventricular pacing via left lateral mini-thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy, and robotic approach. Heart Surg Forum 2003;6(5):412–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Argenziano M, Oz MC, DeRose JJ Jr, et al. Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Heart Surg Forum 2002;5(3):294–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Argenziano M, Oz MC, Kohmoto T, et al. Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Circulation 2003;108(suppl 1):II191–II194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Argenziano M, Williams MR. Robotic atrial septal defect repair and endoscopic treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;15(2):130–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    van Brakel TJ, Bolotin G, Nifong LW, et al. Robot-assisted epicardial ablation of the pulmonary veins: is a completed isolation necessary? Eur Heart J 2005;26(13):1321–1326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dion YM, Gracia CR, Estakhri M, et al. Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: a review of 10 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8(3):165–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Coggia M, Di Centa I, Javerliat I, Alfonsi P, Kitzis M, Goeau-Brissonniere OA. Total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysms repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005;46(4):407–414.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stadler P, Matous P, Vitasek P, Spacek M. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg 2006;44(5):915–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Diks J, Nio D, Jongkind V, Cuesta MA, Rauwerda JA, Wisselink W. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta: the early learning curve. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1760–1763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hollands CM, Dixey LN. Robotic-assisted esophagoesophagostomy. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37(7):983–985; discussion 983–985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hollands CM, Dixey LN, Torma MJ. Technical assessment of porcine enteroenterostomy performed with ZEUS robotic technology. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36(8):1231–1233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lorincz A, Langenburg S, Klein M. Robotics and the pediatric surgeon. Curr Opin Pediatr 2003;15(3):262–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Malhotra SP, Le D, Thelitz S, et al. Robotic-assisted endoscopic thoracic aortic anastomosis in juvenile lambs. Heart Surg Forum 2002;6(1):38–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Aaronson OS, Tulipan NB, Cywes R, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic intrauterine myelomeningocele repair: a feasibility study. Pediatr Neurosurg 2002;36(2):85–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Olsen LH, Deding D, Yeung CK, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted laparoscopic pneumovesical ureter reimplantation a.m. Cohen: initial experience in a pig model. APMIS Suppl 2003;109:23–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Andrews RJ, Mah RW. The NASA Smart Probe Project for realtime multiple microsensor tissue recognition. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2003;80(1–4):114–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 2002;235(4):487–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Marescaux J, Mutter D, Soler L, Vix M, Leroy J. The Virtual University applied to telesurgery: from tele-education to tele-manipulation. Bull Acad Natl Med 1999;183(3):509–521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Marescaux J, Rubino F. Telesurgery, telementoring, virtual surgery, and telerobotics. Curr Urol Rep 2003;4(2):109–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Marescaux J, Soler L, Mutter D, et al. Virtual university applied to telesurgery: from teleeducation to telemanipulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000;70:195–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ruurda JP, Visser PL, Broeders LA. Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comput Aided Surg 2003;8(1):24–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, et al. Evaluation of tele-surgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2001;15(9):918–923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Le Bret E, Papadatos S, Folliguet T, et al. Interruption of patent ductus arteriosus in children: robotically assisted versus video-thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123(5):973–976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gutt CN, Markus B, Kim ZG, Meininger D, Brinkmann L, Heller K. Early experiences of robotic surgery in children. Surg Endosc 2002;16(7):1083–1086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Heller K, Gutt C, Schaeff B, Beyer PA, Markus B. Use of the robot system da Vinci for laparoscopic repair of gastroesophageal reflux in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002;12(4):239–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Luebbe B, Wolf SA, Irish MS. Robotically assisted minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric population: initial experience, technical considerations, and description of the da Vinci? Surgical System. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech. 2003;7(4):385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Mihaljevic T, Cannon JW, del Nido PJ. Robotically assisted division of a vascular ring in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125(5):1163–1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell K. Woo
    • 1
  • David A. Peterson
    • 1
  • David Le
    • 1
  • Michael E. Gertner
    • 2
  • Thomas Krummel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric SurgeryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations