Advertisement

Surgery pp 2317-2324 | Cite as

Biomaterials and the Evolution of Hernia Repair III: Biologically Derived Prosthetic Meshes

  • Raul A. Cortes
  • Edward Miranda
  • Hanmin Lee
  • Michael E. Gertner

Abstract

The concept of using biologically based tissues as constructs is not new. For example, tissue-based heart valves have been used in cardiac surgery for more than three decades with excellent clinical success. Using protein fixation techniques, long-term host recognition of cadaveric or porcine antigens have been successfully repressed.

Keywords

Hernia Repair Ventral Hernia Repair Acellular Dermal Matrix Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Porcine Dermis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mathes SJ, Steinwald PM, Foster RD, Hoffman WY, Anthony JP. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure. Ann Surg 2000;232(4):586–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Disa JJ, Klein MH, Goldberg NH. Advantages of autologous fascia versus synthetic patch abdominal reconstruction in experimental animal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97(4):801–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Disa JJ, Goldberg NH, Carlton JM, Robertson BC, Slezak S. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101(4):979–986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oliver RF, Barker H, Cooke A, Grant RA. Dermal collagen implants. Biomaterials 1982;3(1):38–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Badylak SF, et al. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response. Transplantation 2001;71(11):1631–1640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allman AJ, McPherson TB, Merrill LC, Badylak SF, Metzger DW. The Th2-restricted immune response to xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa does not influence systemic protective immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens. Tissue Eng 2002;8(1):53–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palmer EM, Beilfuss BA, Nagai T, Semnani RT, Badylak SF, van Seventer GA. Human helper T cell activation and differentiation is suppressed by porcine small intestinal submucosa. Tissue Eng 2002;8(5):893–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarke KM, Lantz GC, Salisbury SK, Badylak SF, Hiles MC, Voytik SL. Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res 1996;60(1):107–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prevel CD, Eppley BL, Summerlin DJ, Jackson JR, McCarty M, Badylak SF. Small intestinal submucosa: utilization for repair of rodent abdominal wall defects. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35(4):374–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP, Clarke RB. Use of small intestinal submucosal implants for regeneration of large fascial defects: an experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;46(2):203–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Whitson B. Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. J Surg Res 2001;99(2):282–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edelman DS. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with porcine small intestinal submucosa: a preliminary study. J Surg Laparosc Surg 2002;6(3):203–205.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up. Hernia 2004;8(3):186–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente SG, Lawson DC, Pappas TN. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8(1):109–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NJ, Abcarian H. Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 2005;140(6):549–560; discussion 560–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, Pellegrini CA. The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique. Am J Surg 2003;186(1):4–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Livesey SA, Herndon DN, Hollyoak MA, Atkinson YH, Nag A. Transplanted acellular allograft dermal matrix. Potential as a template for the reconstruction of viable dermis. Transplantation 1995;60(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wainwright D, Madden M, Luterman A, et al. Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996;17(2):124–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2000;20(1):51–59.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Silverman RP, Li EN, Holton LH 3rd, Sawan KT, Goldberg NH. Ventral hernia repair using allogenic acellular dermal matrix in a swine model. Hernia 2004;8(4):336–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaplin JM, Costantino PD, Wolpoe ME, Bederson JB, Griffey ES, Zhang WX. Use of an acellular dermal allograft for dural replacement: an experimental study. Neurosurgery 1999;45(2):320–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA, McCormick S, Cocker R, Parker A. Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2(2):130–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    DeSagun EZ, Botts JL, Srivastava A, Hanumadass M, Walter RJ. Long-term outcome of xenogenic dermal matrix implantation in immunocompetent rats. J Surg Res 2001;96(1):96–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, Byrnes CK, Girotto JA, Goldberg NH, Silverman RP. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50(5):523–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    An G, Walter RJ, Nagy K. Closure of abdominal wall defects using acellular dermal matrix. J Trauma 2004;56(6):1266–1275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silverman RP, Singh NK, Li EN, et al. Restoring abdominal wall integrity in contaminated tissue-deficient wounds using autologous fascia grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113(2):673–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guy JS, Miller R, Morris JA Jr, Diaz J, May A. Early one-stage closure in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome: fascial replacement with human acellular dermis and bipedicle flaps. Am Surg 2003;69(12):1025–1028; discussion 1028–1029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52(2):188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Girard S, Sideman M, Spain DA. A novel approach to the problem of intestinal fistulization arising in patients managed with open peritoneal cavities. Am J Surg 2002;184(2):166–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bucky LP, May JW Jr. Synthetic mesh. Its use in abdominal wall reconstruction after the TRAM. Clin Plast Surg 1994;21(2):273–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaleya RN. Evaluation of implant/host tissue interactions following intraperitoneal implantation of porcine dermal collagen prosthesis in the rat. Hernia 2005;9(3):269–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Macleod TM, Williams G, Sanders R, Green CJ. Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58(4):518–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Macleod TM, Sarathchandra P, Williams G, Sanders R, Green CJ. The diamond CO2 laser as a method of improving the vascularization of a permanent collagen implant. Burns 2004;30(7):704–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sarmah BD, Holl-Allen RT. Porcine dermal collagen repair of incisional herniae. Br J Surg 1984;71(7):524–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, North JH Jr. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg 2006;63(4):255–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JN, Giordano P. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. Br J Plast Surg 2006;59:553–555.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Richards SK, Lear PA, Huskisson L, Saleem MA, Morgan JD. Porcine dermal collagen graft in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2005;9(5):627–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raul A. Cortes
    • 1
  • Edward Miranda
    • 2
  • Hanmin Lee
    • 3
  • Michael E. Gertner
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryCalifornia-Pacific Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Pediatrics, and OB-Gyn and Reproductive ServicesUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations