Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Malabsorption Procedures: The Technique of Biliopancre atic Diversion

  • Chapter
Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery
  • 1173 Accesses

Abstract

Scopinaro’s lifelong commitment to biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has demonstrated its effectiveness as a tool offering sustained weight loss (1). Scopinaro’s initial technique really has not changed much since the 1970s. The procedure offers a two-pronged attack: initial restriction and then maintenance by malabsorption (2). Benefits derived from laparoscopic techniques applied to abdominal procedures relate to elimination of wound complications, namely pain and suffering, and delayed complications from the incision itself. The greatest benefit has come in those procedures where the morbidity was almost entirely related to the wound, particularly cholecystectomy, fundoplication, and splenectomy in the upper abdomen and inguinal hernia and colectomy in the lower abdomen (36).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg 1998;22(9):936–946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scopinaro N, Gianette E, Cavalleri D. Biliopancreatic bypass for obesity: II. Initial experiences in man. Br J Surg 1979;66:618–620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, et al. Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 1998; 228(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW, et al. Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1998; 227(3):335–342.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhodes M, Rudd M, O’Rourke N, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy and lymph node biopsy for hematologic disorders. Ann Surg 1995;222(1):43–46.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bessell Jr, Finch R, Gotley DC, et al. Chronic dysphagia following laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 2000;87(10): 1341–1345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarr MG, Felty CL, Hilmer DM, et al. Technical and practical considerations involved in operations on patients weighing more than 270kg. Arch Surg 1995;130(1): L102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez AZ, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Experience with over 3000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to mortality and leak. Surg Endosc 2003;17(suppl).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Davies RJ. Short-term results of laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥60. Obes Surg 2002;12:643–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs K, White N, Vaimakis S, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass in the “massive superobese.” Obes Surg 2003;13: 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2000;232:515–529.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, et al. Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2002;235:640–647.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg 1998;22(9):936–946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell MT, Pizzitola VJ, Knuttinen MG, et al. Atypical complications of gastric bypass surgery. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:366–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dolan K, Hatzifotis M, Newbury L, et al. A nutritional and weight loss comparison between pancreatico-biliary diversion and duodenal switch. Ann Surg 2004;240(1):51–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paiva D, Bernardes L, Suretti L. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion: technique and initial results. Obes Surg 2002; 12(3):358–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scopinaro N, Marinari GM, Camerini G. Laparoscopic standard biliopancreatic diversion: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg 2002;12(3):362–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fielding, G.A. (2007). Laparoscopic Malabsorption Procedures: The Technique of Biliopancre atic Diversion. In: Schauer, P.R., Schirmer, B.D., Brethauer, S.A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68062-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68062-0_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-68058-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68062-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics