Skip to main content

Access to the Peritoneal Cavity

  • Chapter
  • 1194 Accesses

Abstract

Inherent in all minimally invasive surgery is acquiring safe, efficient, and cost-effective access to the cavity of interest. Bariatric surgery presents some challenges for achieving peritoneal access because of the patient’s body habitus, limitations of the current equipment, and comorbidities. The goals of access include excellent abdominal exposure, ingress for instruments, egress of specimens, and minimization of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Veress VJ. Eine nadel für gefahrlose Anwendung des Pneumoperitoneums. Gastroenterologia 1961;96:150–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hasson HM, et al. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:763–766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ternamian AM, Deitel M. Endoscopic threaded imaging port (EndoTIP) for laparoscopy: experience with different body weights. Obes Surg 1999;9:44–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hazebroek EJ, et al. Impact of temperature and humidity of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on body temperature and peritoneal morphology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002;12(5):355–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2000;87(3):273–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schaller G, Kuenkel M, Manegold BC. The optical “Veressneedle”-initial puncture with a minioptic. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1995;3(1):55–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz ML, Drew RL, Andersen JN. Induction of pneumoperitoneum in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2003; 13:601–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Munro MG. Laparoscopic access: Complications, technologies, and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14: 365–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobson MT, et al. The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy. JSLS 2002;6(2):169–174.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Merlin TL, et al. Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2003;90:668–679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yerdel MA, et al. Direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;177:247–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tansatit T, et al. Dilating missile trocar for primary port establishment: a cadaver study. J Med Assoc Thai 2002; 85(suppl 1):S320–326.

    Google Scholar 

  13. String A, et al. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2001;15(6):570–573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharp HT, et al. Complications associated with optical access laparoscopic trocars. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:553–555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Molloy D. Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42(3):246–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanney RM, et al. Use of the Hasson cannula producing major vascular injury at laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1999;13: 1238–1240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carbonell AM, et al. Umbilical stalk technique for establishing pneumoperitoneum. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002;12(3):203–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Senapati PSP, et al. “Semi-open” blunt primary access to the abdominal cavity during laparoscopic surgery: A new technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2003;13(5):313–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernik TR, et al. Balloon blunt-tip trocar for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Improvement over the traditional Hasson and Veress needle methods. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001;11(2):73–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG. Incision characteristics associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: a randomized, observer-blinded comparison. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:89–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hurd WW, Wang L, Schemmel MT. A comparison of the relative risk of vessel injury with conical versus pyramidal laparoscopic trocars in a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1731–1733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campo R, Gordts S, Brosens I. Minimally invasive exploration of the female reproductive tract in infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;4(suppl 3):40–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192(4): 478–491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Riedel HH, et al. German pelviscopic statistics for the years 1978–1982. Endoscopy 1986;18:219–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Catarci M, et al. Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: A multicenter study on 12919 cases. Surg Endosc 2001;15:566–569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soderstrom RM. Injuries to major blood vessels during endoscopy. J Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997;4:395–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vilos GA. Litigation of laparoscopic major vessel injuries in Canada. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:503–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Philips PA, Amaral JF. Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192(4):525–536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Podnos YD, et al. Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: A review of 3464 cases. Arch Surg 2003;138:957–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kent III RB. Subcutaneous emphysema and hypercarbia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1991; 126:1154–1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schlösser, C.T., Ikramuddin, S. (2007). Access to the Peritoneal Cavity. In: Schauer, P.R., Schirmer, B.D., Brethauer, S.A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68062-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68062-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-68058-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68062-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics