External Dose Assessment
We now begin two chapters on the measurement or calculation of radiation dose to humans, external and internal dose assessment. Dose assessment is the correct formal name for this process. In day-to-day use, however, most people will refer to this as external and internal dosimetry. This is the classic historical term, in use since at least the Manhattan Project in the 1940s. The term “dosimetry” contains the suffix “metry”, which relates to metrology, which implies the measurement of physical quantities. In the last chapter, we looked at the issue of personnel dose-measuring devices. Much of external dose assessment does have to do with measurements, so the term “dosimetry” is mostly accurate. In this chapter, however, we show that a lot of work done in external dose assessment involves theoretical calculations of dose, generally with later verification using a survey meter or personnel monitoring devices.
KeywordsExposure Rate Skin Dose Plane Source Tritiated Water Monte Carlo Code
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.E. B. Podgorsak, External photon beams: Physical aspects. Chapter 6, http://www.naweb.iaea.org/nahu/dmrp/pdf_files/Chapter6.pdf.
- 2.J. J. Fitzgerald, Applied Radiation Protection and Control (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970) pp. 822, 838.Google Scholar
- 3.International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 89: Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values. (Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 2003).Google Scholar
- 5.W. G. Cross, G. Williams, H. Ing, N. O. Freedman, and J. Mainville, Tables of beta ray dose distributions in water, air and other media (Atomic Energy of Canada, AECL-7617, 1982).Google Scholar
- 6.J. S. Durham, W. D. Reece, and S. E. Merwin, Modelling three-dimensional beta sources for skin dose calculations using VARSKIN Mod 2, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 37 (2),89-94 (1991).Google Scholar
- 9.L. Dillman, Scattered energy spectrum for monoenergetic gamma emitter uniformly distributed in an infinite cloud (ORNL 4584, Health Physics Division Annual Progress Report for Period Ending July 1970, October 1980).Google Scholar
- 14.K. Morgan and J. Turner, Principles of Radiation Protection (Wiley, New York, 1967), p. 285.Google Scholar
- 15.http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/radiation/ hppos/qa426.html.
- 18.F. J. Rutar, S. C. Augustine, D. Colcher, et al., Outpatient treatment with 131I-anti-B1 antibody: radiation exposure to family members, J. Nucl. Med. 42,907-915 (2001).Google Scholar
- 19.R. L. Ford and W. R. Nelson, The EGS code system: Computer programmes for the Monte Carlo simulation of electromagnetic cascade showers. Report No. SLAC-210, Version 3 (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1978).Google Scholar
- 20.J. Briesmeister, MCNP - A general Monte Carlo n-particle transport code, version 4B. Los Alamos National Laboratory, report LA-12625-M (1997).Google Scholar
- 22.International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 74: Con-version Coefficients For Use In Radiological Protection Against External Radia-tion, 74 (Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, 1997).Google Scholar
- 23.Y. Yamaguchi, DEEP code to calculate dose eyuivulents in human phantom for external photon exposure by Monte Carlo method. Report No. JAERI-M 90-235 (Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki- Ken, 1991).Google Scholar
- 25.I. Kurochkin, Institute for High Energy Physics, Serpukhov, private communication to the ICRP (1994).Google Scholar
- 26.R. Kramer, Ermittlung von Konversionsjaktoren zwischen Korperdosen und rel-evanten Struhlungskenngriissen bei externer Riintgen- und Gammabestrahlung, GSF-Bericht S-556. Gesellschaft fiir Strahlen- und Umweltforschung mbH, Munich (1979).Google Scholar
- 27.R. Veit, M. Zankl, N. Petoussi, E. Mannweiler, G. Williams, and G. Drexler, Tomo-graphic anthropomorphic models. Part I: Construction technique and description of models of an S-week-old baby and a 7-year-old child, GFS-Bericht No. 3/89. Gesellschaft fir Strahlen und Umweltforschung mbH, Munich (1989).Google Scholar
- 28.G. G. Warner and A. M. Craig, Jr., ALGAM, a computer program for estimating internal dose for gamma-ruy sources in a human phantom. Report No. ORNL-TM-2250 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1968).Google Scholar
- 29.V. T. Golovachik, V. N. Kustrarjov, E. N. Savitskaya, and A. V. Sannikov, Absorbed dose and dose equivalent depth distributions for protons with energies from 2 to 600 MeV. Rudiut. Prot. Dosim. 28, 189-199 (1989).Google Scholar
- 30.R. A. Hollnagel, Effective dose equivalent and organ doses for neutrons from thermal to 14 MeV. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 30, 149-159 (1990).Google Scholar