Abstract
This chapter was inspired by the credibility panel discussion, “Keeping our credibility: Release of News”, held at the conference Communicating Astronomy with the Public 2005 in Munich in June 200558. Part of the content here is based on an exploratory qualitative study of press releases in astronomy (Nielsen et al., 2006) by a study group from Roskilde University (Denmark), under the leadership of Lars Holm Nielsen, who con ducted part of their studies at the ESA/Hubble in the winter of 2005–2006. The other group members were Nanna Torpe Jørgensen, Kim Jantzen and Sanne Bjerg. As part of the study a series of 12 indepth interviews59 with public information officers from large government scientific institutions, as well as journalists and scientists closely involved in the work of public information officers, were conducted in the winter of 2005. Most of the conclusions below have been extracted from this study.
Webcast of the panel discussion and the subsequent wide-ranging and lively discussion is available at http://www.communicatingastronomy.org/cap2005/programme.html.
http://www.spacetelescope.org/projects/credibility/credibility.html
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Credibility in Science Communication. In: The Hands-On Guide For Science Communicators. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49960-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49960-4_21
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26324-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-49960-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)