Diagnostic Imaging

  • Vernon M. Chapman
  • Diego Jaramillo


Diagnostic imaging is frequently performed in the evaluation of adolescent sports-related injuries. Imaging often helps determine the nature and severity of injuries and is important for deciding appropriate management. There are several diagnostic imaging techniques available for examining the musculoskeletal system. An understanding of the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of these techniques and their clinical application in adolescent patients is important for optimal imaging evaluation.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Growth Plate Disc Herniation Slip Capital Femoral Epiphysis Intracranial Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fayad LM, Johnson P, Fishman EK. Multidetector CT of musculoskeletal disease in the pediatric patient: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2005;25:603–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risk of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289–296.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendrick RE. Basic physics of MR imaging: an introduction. Radiographics 1994;14: 829–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics 2003;23:341–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Middleton WD, Kurtz AB. Ultrasound: The Requisites. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poussaint TY, Moeller KK. Imaging of pediatric head trauma. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2002;12:271–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noguchi K, Ogawa T, Seto H, et al. Subacute and chronic subarachnoid hemorrhage: diagnosis with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging. Radiology 1997;203:257–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Turner BG, Rhea JT, Thrall JH, Small AB, Novelline RA. Trends in the use of CT and radiography in the evaluation of facial trauma, 1992–2002: Implications for Current Costs. Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:751–754.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keenan HT, Hollingshead MC, Chung CJ, Ziglar MK. Using CT of the cervical spine for early evaluation of pediatric patients with head trauma. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1405–1409.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Afshani E, Kuhn JP. Common causes of low back pain in children. Radiographics 1991;11:269–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR, Taylor GA. CT in children with rupture of the bowel caused by blunt trauma: diagnostic efficacy and comparison with hypoperfusion complex. Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1195–1198.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landin L. Epidemiology of children’s fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 1997;6: 79–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salter R, Harris W. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45:587–622.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jaramillo D, Kammen BF, Shapiro F. Cartilaginous path of physeal fracture-separations: evaluation with MR imaging-an experimental study with histologie correlation in rabbits. Radiology 2000;215:504–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stevens MA, El-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Brandser EA, Chow S. Imaging features of avulsion injuries. Radiographics 1999;19:655–672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oeppen RS, Connolly SA, Bencardino JT, Jaramillo D. Acute injury of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone: a common but unrecognized lesion in the immature knee. Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:111–117.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shih C, Chang C, Penn I, et al. Chronically stressed wrists in adolescent gymnasts: MR imaging appearance. Radiology 1995;195:855–859.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fleming JL, Hollingsworth CL, Squire DL, Bisset GS. Little leaguer’s shoulder. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:352–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jaramillo D, Shapiro F. Musculoskeletal trauma in children. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:521–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laor T, Wall EJ, Louis PV. Physeal widening in the knee due to stress injury in child athletes. Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1260–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Umans H, Liebling MS, Moy L, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a physeal lesion diagnosed by MRI, with radiographic and CT correlation. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:139–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogers L, Poznanski A. Imaging of epiphyseal injuries. Radiology 1994;191: 297–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson HA, Madhok R, Benson JT, et al. Physeal fractures: Part 1. Epidemiology in Olmstead County, Minnesota, 1979–1988. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:423–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peterson HA. Physeal and apophyseal injuries. In: Rockwood J, Wilkins KE, Beaty JH, eds. Fractures in Children. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:103–165.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ecklund K, Jaramillo D. Patterns of premature physeal arrest: MR imaging of 111 children. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:967–972.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Disler DG. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: Assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1117–1124.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Borsa JJ, Peterson HA, Ehman RL. MR imaging of physeal bars. Radiology 1996;199:683–687.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vernon M. Chapman
    • 1
  • Diego Jaramillo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThe Children’s Hospital/Radiology Imaging AssociatesDenverUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations