Advertisement

Diagnosis of Central Hypovolemia in a Spontaneously Breathing Patient

  • N. Airapetian
  • J. Maizel
  • M. Slama

Abstract

Volemia is the total blood volume of the body (plasma and cells) and is normally situated in the range of 65 to 75 ml/kg. Hypovolemia is a very frequent clinical situation in intensive care. Two types of hypovolemia are distinguished: Absolute and relative hypovolemia. Absolute hypovolemia is defined as a reduction in total circulating blood volume [1, 2], which may be related to blood loss (hemorrhage) or plasma loss (gastrointestinal, renal, cutaneous, extravasation into interstitial tissues). Relative hypovolemia is defined as an inadequate distribution of blood volume between the central and peripheral compartments (venodilatation or during positive pressure ventilation).

Keywords

Right Ventricular Stroke Volume Volume Expansion Fluid Responsiveness Pulse Pressure Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Coudray A, Romand JA, Treggiari M, Bendjelid K (2005) Fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: a review of indexes used in intensive care. Crit Care Med 33:2757–2762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121:2000–2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braunwald E, Sonnenblick E, Ross J (1988) Mechanisms of cardiac contraction and relaxation In: Braunwald E (ed) Heart Disease. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 389–425Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Starling E (1918) The Linacre Lecture on the Law of the Heart: given at Cambridge, 1915. Longmans, Green and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schumacker PT, Cain SM (1987) The concept of a critical oxygen delivery. Intensive Care Med 13:223–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terada LS (2002) Oxidative stress and endothelial activation. Crit Care Med 30:S186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levi M, de Jonge E, van der Poll T, ten Cate H (1999) Disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost 82:695–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2001) Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 119:867–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2004) The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 30:1834–1837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL et al (2002) Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H1729–1733PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Augarde R, Prin P, Page B, Beauchet A, Jardin F (2001) Influence of superior vena caval zone condition on cyclic changes in right ventricular outflow during respiratory support. Anesthesiology 95:1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al (2004) Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1734–1739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McConachie I (1991) Fluid balance in ARDS. Anaesthesia 46:511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lam C, Tyml K, Martin C, Sibbald W (1994) Microvascular perfusion is impaired in a rat model of normotensive sepsis. J Clin Invest 94:2077–2083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shimoda M, Oda S, Tsugane R, Sato O (1993) Intracranial complications of hypervolemic therapy in patients with a delayed ischemic deficit attributed to vasospasm. J Neurosurg 78: 423–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oliveira RP, Weingartner R, Ribas EO, Moraes RS, Friedman G (2002) Acute haemodynamic effects of a hypertonic saline/dextran solution in stable patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 28:1574–1581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prough DS, Bidani A (1999) Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis is a predictable consequence of intraoperative infusion of 0.9% saline. Anesthesiology 90:1247–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mapstone J, Roberts I, Evans P (2003) Fluid resuscitation strategies: a systematic review of animal trials. J Trauma 55:571–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hernandez D, de Rojas F, Martinez Escribano C, et al (2002) Fatal dextran-induced allergic anaphylaxis. Allergy 57:862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moreau R, Lebrec D (2003) Acute renal failure in patients with cirrhosis: perspectives in the age of MELD. Hepatology 37:233–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van de Walle JG, Donckerwolcke RA, Greidanus TB, Joles JA, Koomans HA (1996) Renal sodium handling in children with nephrotic relapse: relation to hypovolaemic symptoms. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:2202–2208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bendjelid K, Romand JA (2003) Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29:352–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slama M, Susic D, Varagic J, Frohlich E (2002) Diastolic dysfunction in hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol 17:368–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Michard F, Teboul JL (2000) Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 4:282–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A, et al (1994) A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 78:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al (2005) Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 31:1195–1201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S (1987) Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 67:498–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, et al (2004) Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med 30:1182–1187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P (1998) Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 89:1313–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, Ginies G (2002) Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 121:1245–1252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34:1402–1407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL (2003) Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 124:1900–1908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al (2003) Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 31:1399–1404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al (2004) Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 32:691–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wagner JG, Leatherman JW (1998) Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest 113:1048–1054PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schneider AJ, Teule GJ, Groeneveld AB, Nauta J, Heidendal GA, Thijs LG (1988) Biventricular performance during volume loading in patients with early septic shock, with emphasis on the right ventricle: a combined hemodynamic and radionuclide study. Am Heart J 116: 103–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reuse C, Vincent JL, Pinsky MR (1990) Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest 98:1450–1454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ (1981) The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery 90:61–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL (2006) How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care 10:R102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Magder S, Lagonidis D (1999) Effectiveness of albumin versus normal saline as a test of volume responsiveness in post-cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care 14:164–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Airapetian
    • 1
  • J. Maizel
    • 2
  • M. Slama
    • 3
  1. 1.Intensive Care Unit, Department of NephrologyCHU SudAmiens Cedex 1France
  2. 2.Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of NephrologyCHU SudAmiensFrance
  3. 3.Medical Intensive Care Unit, Service of NephrologyCHU SudAmiensFrance

Personalised recommendations