The Meaning of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients with Shock: Role of Echocardiography

  • A. Vieillard-Baron


The development of noninvasive devices to manage hemodynamics in patients with shock is directly prompted by the results of recent studies in the intensive care unit (ICU), and during the perioperative period, which demonstrated the inability of an invasive approach, based on right heart catheterization, to improve prognosis [1]. Some authors have suggested that these results were largely due to inaccurate use of right heart catheterization, without clear goals or protocol [2], However, previous studies have demonstrated that optimization of cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) with clear endpoints also fails to improve prognosis [3]. So, the lack of efficacy is inherent in the device. In 1985, Eugene Robin suggested that using right heart catheterization in patients with shock led physicians to give fluids plus diuretics whatever the wedge pressure [4]. In 2003, Francois Jardin claimed that we were going to move from the “age of oil lamps” to the “age of elec-tricity” [5]. In fact, we are going to change our practices in the management of shock, from an invasive and quantitative approach of hemodynamics to a non-invasive one, more functional and especially qualitative, mainly thanks to the use of echocardiography. This leads us to think about the meaning of hemodynamic monitoring.


Cardiac Index Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Heart Catheterization Hemodynamic Monitoring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shah M, Hasselblad V, Stevenson L, et al (2005) Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 294:1664–1670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinsky M, Vincent JL (2005) Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit Care Med 33:1119–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boldt J (2002) Clinical review: hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 6:52–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robin E (1985) The cult of the Swan-Ganz catheter. Overuse and abuse of pulmonary flow catheters. Ann Intern Med 103:445–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jardin F (2003) Ventricular interdependance: how does it impact on hemodynamic evaluation in clinical practice ? Intensive Care Med 29:361–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toussignant C, Walsh F, Mazer C (2000) The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 90:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al (2004) Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1734–1739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P (1998) Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 89:1309–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Combes A, Arnoult F, Trouillet JL (2004) Tissue Doppler imaging estimation of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 30:75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A (2006) Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 12:249–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A (2006) Ultrasonographic examination of the venae cavae. Intensive Care Med 32:203–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, et al (2004) Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1740–1746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Prin S, Chergui K, Dubourg O, Jardin F (2003) Hemodynamic instability in sepsis: bedside assessment by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168: 1270–1276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jardin F, Valtier B, Beauchet A, Dubourg O, Bourdarias JP (1994) Invasive monitoring combined with two-dimensional echocardiographic study in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 20:550–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Chergui K, Peyrouset O, Jardin F (2006) Bedside echocardio-graphic evaluation of hemodynamics in sepsis: is a qualitative evaluation sufficient? Intensive Care Med 32:1547–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zapol W, Snider M (1977) Pulmonary hypertension in severe acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 296:476–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Schmitt JM, Augarde R, et al (2001) Acute cor pulmonale in acute respiratory distress syndrome submitted to protective ventilation: incidence, clinical implications, and prognosis. Crit Care Med 29:1551–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dhainaut JF, Pinsky M, Nouria S, Slomka F, Brunet F (1997) Right ventricular function in human sepsis: a thermodilution study. Chest 112:1043–1049PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Groeneveld A, Berendsen R, Schneider A, Pneumatikos I, Stokkel L, Thijs L (2000) Effect of the mechanical ventilatory cycle on thermodilution right ventricular volumes and cardiac output. J Appl Physiol 89:89–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoeper M, Tongers J, Lepeprt A, Baus S, Maier R, Lotz J (2001) Evaluation of right ventricular performance with a right ventricular ejection fraction thermodilution catheter and MRI in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest 120:502–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Prin S, Chergui K, Dubourg O, Jardin F (2002) Echo-Doppler demonstration of acute cor pulmonale at the bedside in the medical intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:1310–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jardin F, Dubourg O, Bourdarias JP (1997) Echocardiographic pattern of acute cor pulmonale. Chest 111:209–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, et al (1995) A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 333:1025–1032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varpula M, Tallgren M, Saukkonen K, Voipio-Pulkki L, Pettila V (2005) Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 31:1066–1071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Estenssoro E, Dubin A, Laffaire E, et al (2002) Incidence, clinical course, and outcome in 217 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 30:2450–2456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Vieillard-Baron
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Intensive Care UnitHôpital Ambroise ParéBoulogneFrance

Personalised recommendations