Skip to main content

Breast Reconstruction

Implant and Nipple Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • 1510 Accesses

Abstract

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy has been shown to have a positive effect on the psychological well being of women with breast cancer. Nearly 65,000 women in the United States alone had breast reconstruction last year, a 130% increase from just more than a decade ago (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons, www.plasticsurgery.org. Date accessed: 7/30/07.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;49:713–721.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1111–1115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maxwell GP, Falcone PA. Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions using a textured silicone tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1022–1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1119–1123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al Ghazal SK, Sully L, Fallowfleld L, Blarney RW. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:17–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:930–942.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:877–881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singletary SE, Robb GL. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:95–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson GW, Losken A, Moore B, et al. Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:222–228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:467–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vandeweyer E, Deraemaecker R, Nogaret JM, Hertens D. Immediate breast reconstruction with implants and adjuvant chemotherapy: a good option? Acta Chir Belg 2003;103:98–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson CR, Brown IM, Weiller-Mithoff E, George WD, Doughty JC. Immediate breast reconstruction does not lead to a delay in the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:624–627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger B, Rogers K, Messina P, Gayle L. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:465–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. King T, Borgen P. Atlas of procedures in breast cancer surgery. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D. Filler injection enhances the projection of the reconstructed nipple: an original easy technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29(4):287–294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans K, Rasko Y, Lenert J, Olding M. The use of calcium hydroxylapatite for nipple projection after failed nipple-areolar reconstruction: early results. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55(1):25–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farhadi J, Makxveytyte GK, Schaefer D, Pierer G, Scheufler O. Reconstruction of the nipple-areolar complex: an update. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59(1):40–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Disa, J.J., McCarthy, C.M. (2008). Breast Reconstruction. In: Butler, C.E., Fine, N.A. (eds) Principles of Cancer Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49504-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49504-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-49502-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-49504-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics