Sirius pp 29-46 | Cite as

From Myth to Reality

Part of the Springer Praxis Books book series (PRAXIS)


The long intellectual journey from viewing Sirius and the other stars as the heavenly counterparts of myth and superstition, to the realization that the stars are actual material objects governed by physical laws, spanned nearly 25 centuries. One important way station on that journey was the ancient city of Alexandria in Egypt. It was in Alexandria, founded by Alexander the Great in 332 BC during his conquest of Egypt, where many key Greek astronomers either worked or studied over a period of nearly five centuries. The origin of many important discoveries and ideas that shape our thoughts about the stars can be traced to Alexandria and to the Great Library that flourished there. Among the important names associated with Alexandrian astronomy are Aristarchus, Hipparchus, Eratosthenes, and Ptolemy. With the prominent exception of Ptolemy, much of the original work of these ancient astronomers is now lost and we have only secondary sources and commentaries from which to gauge their achievements.


Bright Star Astronomical Unit Star Catalog Precessional Motion Stellar Parallax 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 3

  1. Cook, Alan, 1998, Edmund Halley charting the Heavens and the Seas, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Grant, Edward, 1997, The Medieval Cosmos: Its Structure and Operation, JHA, 28, 147–168.Google Scholar
  3. Halley, Edmund, 1718, Considerations on the Change of the Latitudes of Some of the principal fixt Stars, Phil. Trans, 30, 736–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Halley, Edmund, 1720, Of the Infinity of the Sphere of the Fix’d Stars, Phil. Trans., 31, 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halley, Edmund, 1720, Of the Number, Order and Light of the Fix’d Stars, Phil. Trans., 31, 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herschel, William Friedrich, 1782, On the Parallax of the Fixed Stars, Phil. Trans., 72, 492–501.Google Scholar
  7. Herschel, William Friedrich, 1803, Account of the Changes that have happened during the last Twenty-Five Years, in the relative Situation of Double-Stars with an Investigation of the Cause to which they are owing, Phil. Trans., 93, 339–382 and 94, 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirshfeld, Alan M., 2001, The Race to Measure the Cosmos, W. M. Freeman & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hoskin, Michael, 1985, Stukeley’s Cosmology and Newtonian Origins of Obler’s Paradox, JHA, 16, 77–112.Google Scholar
  10. Kepler, Johannes, 1604, Optics: Paralipomena to Wileo & Optical Part of Astronomy, 2000, translated by William H. Donahue, Green Lion Press.Google Scholar
  11. Newton, Isaac, 1728, A Treatise of the System of the World, translated by Bernard I. Cohen, 1969, Dawsons of Pall Mall, London.Google Scholar
  12. White, Andrew Dickson, 1898, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, D. Appleton & Company, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK 2007

Personalised recommendations