Skip to main content

Sources of Manufacturing Productivity Growth: U.S. States 1990–1999

  • Chapter
Book cover Aggregation, Efficiency, and Measurement

Abstract

In this paper we employ a panel of state level manufacturing data for the U.S. to estimate productivity growth and its sources during the 1990s. Following (2002), we augment the usual Malmquist decomposition of productivity growth with a capital deepening component. We find that innovation was the primary determinant of manufacturing productivity growth in all states, but that most states ended the decade further from the production possibilities frontier than they started. Capital deepening contributed to labor productivity growth in all but three states, and explains at least half of the labor productivity growth in a dozen states.

In a second stage, we investigate various policy-related variables and their relationship to productivity growth and its components. We find that a growing technology sector was a strong contributor to labor productivity growth, while a growing public sector was largely a drag. Improvements in labor force quality appear to have had little impact on the pace of technical change or the diffusion of technology, but capital deepening was significantly greater in states with a more highly educated population.

We have benefitted from comments and discussion with Donna Ginther, Steve Brown, Thijs ten Raa, Daniel Henderson and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Richard G. and Kevin L. Kliesen. “The 1990s Acceleration in Labor Productivity: Causes and Measurement” The Federal Reserve Bannk of St. Louis Review 88(3) (2006), 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschauer, David Alan. “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics 23 (1989), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisso, D., S. Grosskopf and K. Hayes. “Productivity and Efficiency in the US: Effects of Business Cycles and Public Capital,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 30 (2000), 663–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven P.A., Kathy J. Hayes, and Lori L. Taylor.“State and Local Policy, Factor Markets and Regional Growth,” Review of Regional Studies, 33(1) (2003), 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Gavin. “Why did UK Productivity Growth Slow Down in the 1970s and Speed up in the 1980s?” Economica 70(277) (2003), 121–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert. “The Economic. Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity.” Econometrica 50(6) (1982), 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2(6) (1978), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, David. “Experience and Growth,” Economics Letters 85(1) (2004), 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domazlicky, B. R, and W. L. Weber. “Productivity Growth and Pollution in State Manufacturing” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (2001), 195–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domazlicky, B. R, and W. L. Weber. “Determinants of total factor Productivity, technological Change and Efficiency Differentials Among States, 1977–86” Review of Regional Studies 28(2) (1998), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domazlicky, B. R, and W. L. Weber. “Total Factor Productivity in the Contiguous United States, 1977–86” Journal of Regional Science 37 (1998), 213–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. Fundamentals of Production Theory. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C.A.K Lovell. Production Frontiers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren and P. Roos. “Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach.” Discussion Paper 89-3, Southern Illinois University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries.” American Economic Review, 84(1) (1994), 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Michael J. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3) (1957), 253–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Mila, T., T J. McGuire and R.H. Porter. “The Effect of Public Capital in State-Level Production Functions Reconsidered,” Review of Economics and Statistics (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, Shawna, Kathy Hayes and Lori L. Taylor. “Productivity, Innovation and Diffusion in the United States: Can Policy put the States on the Technology Frontier?,” mimeo, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Daniel J. and Subal C. Kumbhakar. “Public and Private Capital Productivity Puzzle: A Nonparametric Approach,” mimeo, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Daniel J. and R. R. Russell. “Human Capital and Convergence: A Production-Frontier Approach,” International Economic Review 46(4) (2005), 1167–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, Douglas. “Public-Sector Capital and the Productivity Puzzle,” Review of Economics and Statistics 76 (1994), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, Harry H. and Dennis P. Robinson. “Infrastructure Productivity Estimation and Its Underlying Econometric. Specifications: A Sensitivity Analysis,” Papers in Regional Science 76 (1997), 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. “Information Technology and the U.S. Economy,” American Economie Review 91(1) (2001), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, James and Jong-Soo Lim. “Skilled Labor-Augmenting Technical Progress in U.S. Manufacturing,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4) (1998), 1281–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. and R. R. Russell. “Technological change, Technological Catch-Up and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence,” American Economic Review, 92(3) (2002), f527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. “Index Numbers and Indifference Curves.” Trabajos de Estatistica 4 (1953), 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C.J. and A.B. Schwartz. “State Infrastructure and Productive Performance,” American Economic Review 86(5) (1996a), 1095–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C.J. and A.E. Schwartz. “Public Infrastructure, Private Input Demand, and Economic Performance in New England Manufacturing,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14 (1996b), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C.J. and A.E. Schwartz. “Distinguishing External from Internal Scale Effects: The Case of Public Infrastructure,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, October (1994), 249–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munneli, A. H. “Why has Productivity declined? Productivity and Public Investment,” New England Economic Review, Jan–Feb. (1990a), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munneli, A. H. “How does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance?,” New England Economic Review, Sept–Oct. (1990b), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munneli, A H. “How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance?” in Alicia H. Munneli (ed.) Is There a Shortfall in Public Capital Invest ment?, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston: Boston, 1990c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R.W. Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Lori L. and Stephen P.A. Brown. “The Private Sector Impact of State and Local Government: Has More Become Bad?,” Contemporary Economic Policy, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Raa, Thijs and Pierre Mohnen. “Neoclassical Growth Accounting and Frontier Analysis: A Synthesis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis 18(2) (2002), 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. Fixed Reproducible Tangible Wealth in the United States, 1925–94 (US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, William L. and Bruce R. Domazlicky. “Capital Deepening and Manufacturing’s Contribution to Regional Economic Convergence,” mimeo, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelenyuk, Valentin. “Aggregation of Malmquist Productivity Indexes,” European Journal of Operational Research, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K., Taylor, L.L. (2007). Sources of Manufacturing Productivity Growth: U.S. States 1990–1999. In: Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Primont, D. (eds) Aggregation, Efficiency, and Measurement. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-47677-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics