Advertisement

Services Innovation: Decision Attributes, Innovation Enablers, and Innovation Drivers

  • James M. Tien
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 16)

Abstract

Innovation in the services area — especially in the electronic services (e-services) domain — can be characterized by six decision-oriented attributes: decision-driven, information-based, real-time, continuously-adaptive, customer-centric and computationally-intensive. These attributes constitute the decision informatics paradigm. In turn, decision informatics is supported by information and decision technologies and based on the disciplines of data fusion/analysis, decision modeling and systems engineering. Out of the nine major innovation enablers in the services area (i.e., decision informatics, software algorithms, automation, telecommunication, collaboration, standardization, customization, organization, and globalization), decision informatics is shown to be a necessary enabler. Furthermore, four innovation drivers (i.e., collaboration, customization, integration and adaptation) are identified; all four are directed at empowering the individual — that is, at recognizing that the individual can, respectively, contribute in a collaborative situation, receive customized or personalized attention, access an integrated system or process, and obtain adaptive real-time or just-in-time input. In addition to expanding on current innovations in services and experiences, white spaces are identified for possible future innovations; they include those that can mitigate the unforeseen consequences or abuses of earlier innovations, safeguard our rights to privacy, protect us from the always-on, interconnected world, provide us with an authoritative search engine, and generate a GDP metric that can adequately measure the growing knowledge economy, one driven by intangible ideas and services innovation.

Key words

Services innovation decision informatics software algorithms automation globalization collaboration customization integration adaptation standardization telecommunication organization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayache, N., and Faugeras, O., 1989, “Maintaining Representations of the Environment of Mobile Robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 804–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumol, W. J., Batey-Blackman, S. A., and Wolff, E. N., 1989, Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View, Cambridge, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, D. and Einspruch, N. G., 2006, “Analyzing Corporate Innovation Using The Data Surface Mining Technique,” Proceedings of the 3 rd IEEE Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, June 21–23.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, D., Tien, J. M., and Wallace, W. A., 2001, “Guest Editorial: Technology Management in the Service Industry,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management: Special Cluster, Vol. 148, No. 3, pp. 330–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cairncross, F., 1997, The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution is Changing Our Lives, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, T. L., 2005, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
  7. Chesbrough, H. W., 2003, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Corrado, C, Hulten, C, and Sichel, D., 2005, Intangible Capital and Economic Growth, Baltimore, MD: Federal Reserve Board.Google Scholar
  9. Dychtwald, K., Erickson, T. J., and Morison, R., 2006, Workforce Crisis: How to Beat the Coming Shortage of Skills And Talent, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  10. Embrechts, M., Lee, I. N., and Liao, S.C., 2000, “Data Mining Techniques Applied to Medical Information,” Medical Information, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garvey, T. D., Lowrance, J. D., and Fischler, M. A., 1981, “An Inference Technique for Integrating Knowledge from Disparate Sources,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 319–325.Google Scholar
  12. Gershenfeld, N. A, 2005, FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop — From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication, Boston, MA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C, 2005, Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Graves, R. J., Subbu, R., Sanderson, A. C. and Hocaoghu, C, 1999, “Evolutionary Decision Support for Distributed Virtual Design in Modular Product Manufacturing,” Vol. 10, No. 7, Production Planning and Control, pp. 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunatilaka, A.H., and Baertlein, B. A., 2001, “Feature-Level and Decision-Level Fusion of Noncoincidently Sampled Sensors for Land Mine Detection,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 577–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hallowell, E. M., M.D., 2006, CrazyBusy: Overstretched, Overbooked, and About to Snap! Strategies for Coping in a World Gone ADD, New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H., 1999, Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  18. Moore, G. E., 1965, “Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits”, Electronics, Vol. 38, No. 8, April, pp. 38–41.Google Scholar
  19. National Academy of Engineering, 2000, The Great Achievements Project, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, February.Google Scholar
  20. Nature, 2005, “Internet Encyclopedias Go Head to Head”, Nature, vol. 438, 15 December, pp. 900–901.Google Scholar
  21. National Science Foundation (NSF), 2006, Partnerships for Innovation, Washington, DC: NSF 06-550.Google Scholar
  22. Norwegian Ministry of Industry and Trade (NMIT), 2006, Innovation in Services: Typology, Case Studies and Policy Implications, Oslo, Norway: ECON Report 2006-025, February.Google Scholar
  23. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005, Enhancing the Performance of the Service Sector: Promoting Innovation in Services, Paris, France: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Palmisano, S. J., 2004, Global Innovation Outlook, Armonk, NY: IBM.Google Scholar
  25. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., and Berry, L. L., 1998, “Servqual: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.64, No. 1, pp. 12–40.Google Scholar
  26. Pine II, B. J., and Gilmore, J.H., 1999, The Experience Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  27. Quinn, J. B., Baruch, J. J., and Paquette, P. C., 1987, “Technology in Services,” Scientific American, Vol. 257, No. 6, pp. 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanford, L. S. and Taylor, D., 2005, Let Go To Grow: Escaping the Commodity Trap, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  29. Surowiecki, J., 2005, “Technology and Happiness”, Technology Review, January, pp.72–76.Google Scholar
  30. Tien, J. M., 1986, “On Automated Correctional Data Systems,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 10, No. 3/4, April, pp. 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tien, J. M., 2000, “Individual-Centered Education: An Any One, Any Time, Any Where Approach to Engineering Education,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Special Issue on Systems Engineering Education, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 213–218.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. Tien, J. M., 2003, “Towards A Decision Informatics Paradigm: A Real-Time, Information-Based Approach to Decision Making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Special Issue, Part C, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 102–113.Google Scholar
  33. Tien, J. M., 2005, “Viewing Urban Disruptions from a Decision Informatics Perspective”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, September, pp. 257–288.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Tien, J. M., and Berg, D., 1995, “Systems Engineering in the Growing Service Economy,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 321–326.Google Scholar
  35. Tien, J. M. and Berg, D., 2003, “A Case for Service Systems Engineering”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tien, J. M., and Cahn, M. F., 1981, An Evaluation of the Wilmington Management of Demand Program, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  37. Tien, J. M., Krishnamurthy, A. and Yasar, A., 2004, “Towards Real-Time Customized Management of Supply and Demand Chains”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 3, September, pp. 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. U. S. Congress, 2005, National Innovation Act, Washington, DC: U. S. Congress S2109/HR4654.Google Scholar
  39. von Hippel, E., 2005, Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Tien
    • 1
  1. 1.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations