Skip to main content

Were Subjects Chosen Badly? Selection Bias

  • Chapter
  • 3752 Accesses

Abstract

Selection bias concerns systematic error that may arise from the manner in which subjects are selected into one’s study. In his chapter we describe examples of selection bias, provide a quantitative framework for assessing selection bias, show how selection bias can occur in different types of epidemiologic study designs, and discuss how to adjust for or otherwise deal with selection bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References on Selection Bias

  • Berkson J. Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin 1946;2: 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg RS, Daniels SR, Flanders WD, Eley JW, Boring JR. Medical Epidemiology (3rd Ed). Lange Medical Books, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill H, Kleinbaum DG. Bias in Observational Studies. In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, pp 323–329, Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Alternative analytic methods for case-control studies of estrogens and endometrial cancer. N Engl J Med 1978;299(20):1089–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. John Wiley and Sons Publishers, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

References on Condom Effectiveness Studies

  • Warner L, Clay-Warner J, Boles J, Williamson J. Assessing condom use practices. Implications for evaluating method and user effectiveness. Sex Transm Dis 1998;25(6):273–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner DL, Hatcher RA. A meta-analysis of condom effectiveness in reducing sexually transmitted HIV. Soc Sci Med 1994;38(8):1169–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Were Subjects Chosen Badly? Selection Bias. In: A Pocket Guide to Epidemiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45966-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45966-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-45964-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-45966-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics