Abstract
Evidence for the special success of science can be seen everywhere: in the automobiles we drive, the television we view, the increase in life expectancy, and the fact that man has walked on the moon. We may question the values, or lack thereof, of science, but surely science has been singularly successful in many of the enterprises which it has attempted. It is therefore a little surprising that what constitutes meaningful scientific work is one of the most hotly debated issues of our time. The nature of scientific process and method, the aims or goals of science, the nature and objectivity of scientific knowledge—all are controversial. Still, there is much agreement. This chapter discusses the controversy and attempts to find points of agreement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). The Evolution of Natural Scientists and Their Theories. In: The Nature of Statistical Evidence. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 189. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-40054-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-40054-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-40050-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-40054-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)